Twizz — CS2 Stats

76561198190364847[U:1:230099119]

197Tracked matches71%Win rate2020Tracked since
850Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating16,517Purple band · top ~22.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#18094 of 31744 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=928), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate40.3%42.5%44.2%3.9% short
Shot accuracy20.2%10.9%11.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.270.991.04above
Match win rate26.8%44.2%45.3%18.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTwizzFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER16,517 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning55
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51445Last 10051%Win rateWLWWWTWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.06 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion well above par.

Aim7.5
Aggression5.6
Utility4.4
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch9.4

Strong CT-side openerReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 591ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning5.5
Utility4.4
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time598ms−43ms
first ⅓ avg 641ms → last ⅓ avg 598ms
Headshot accuracy17.3%+4.5%
first ⅓ avg 12.8% → last ⅓ avg 17.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — inferno 13–3
132Biggest win — overpass
4Longest win streak
1210In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 62% over 13mirageWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A30171357%0.02
ancientB158753%0.02
anubisB157847%0.00
infernoA138562%0.05
nukeC125742%0.01
mirageC114736%0.01
overpass31233%-0.01
grail110100%0.17

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

62,246Lifetime kills
1.27K/D · Top 10% of Level 4 players
2,373Matches
26.8%Match win rate
40.3%Headshot %
20.2%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 4 players
3,738MVPs
850Hours (in match)
1,404Bombs planted
543Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,892dust2
1,779inferno
390nuke
351vertigo
158cbble
83train
45office
21stmarc

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

39Matches
49%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
63.5ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

67%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust220%0.7010.0
Mirage1100%0.587.0
Inferno10%0.508.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
36.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.1%Spray accuracy
86.3%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
591msReaction time
25.9%T opening success
48.3%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
3.2%Flash assists
9.16HE damage / grenade
5.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.9134% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–80.0821%14 Jun
dust210–13-0.0010%6 Jun
inferno13–60.0728%6 Jun
ancient13–60.0622%6 Jun
nuke16–120.0415%6 Jun
anubis15–150.0211%6 Jun
inferno13–60.0823%5 Jun
inferno13–50.1620%5 Jun
dust213–80.1325%4 Jun
anubis13–6-0.0216%4 Jun
ancient14–160.0119%3 Jun
ancient13–50.0422%3 Jun
anubis13–10-0.0312%3 Jun
dust25–13-0.0614%31 May
overpass15–15-0.026%31 May
inferno13–40.0911%31 May
dust213–110.0324%29 May
dust29–13-0.0133%29 May
overpass13–2-0.0113%29 May
anubis10–13-0.0423%29 May
dust213–11-0.0020%29 May
ancient11–13-0.0210%28 May
inferno7–13-0.0610%28 May
ancient16–13-0.0412%16 May
dust213–80.028%16 May
anubis13–110.0317%16 May
dust213–90.0117%15 May
inferno14–16-0.0116%15 May
anubis13–110.0419%15 May
mirage13–11-0.016%15 May
nuke7–13-0.0816%15 May
dust28–13-0.0230%15 May
anubis15–150.0219%14 May
dust21–13-0.0612%12 May
inferno6–130.0419%12 May
dust213–50.1413%12 May
mirage9–130.0616%12 May
ancient13–110.0314%6 May
nuke7–13-0.0218%1 May
dust213–80.0220%30 Apr
dust213–110.0419%15 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0213%13 Apr
inferno8–130.0019%13 Apr
ancient3–130.0117%12 Apr
ancient9–130.039%10 Apr
mirage7–13-0.039%10 Apr
dust213–60.046%9 Apr
dust211–130.039%9 Apr
dust213–110.0814%7 Apr
inferno13–30.1719%4 Apr
nuke5–130.0127%4 Apr
overpass15–15-0.0110%27 Sept
inferno13–80.0312%3 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0417%3 Jul
ancient11–130.0913%29 Jun
nuke13–80.0214%29 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0633%29 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0215%29 Jun
nuke2–130.016%28 Jun
dust28–13-0.0410%28 Jun
nuke13–70.0513%28 Jun
ancient16–13-0.016%26 Jun
dust213–30.0311%26 Jun
anubis13–110.0412%25 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0212%24 Jun
dust211–130.0410%24 Jun
dust216–130.0310%24 Jun
dust213–80.0616%24 Jun
mirage13–110.0614%24 Jun
ancient13–110.0513%24 Jun
dust27–13-0.079%23 Jun
dust211–13-0.0411%20 May
mirage14–160.0720%17 May
dust213–5-0.039%16 May
mirage6–130.008%16 May
mirage9–13-0.0719%14 May
dust28–130.0226%14 May
anubis13–40.0511%14 May
anubis16–140.056%14 May
nuke15–15-0.0113%14 May
anubis5–130.0212%13 May
anubis7–13-0.069%13 May
ancient13–30.038%13 May
ancient14–16-0.0313%13 May
dust210–13-0.018%12 May
ancient13–10-0.0116%12 May
nuke13–80.0511%12 May
dust213–100.0615%12 May
grail13–30.1718%11 May
mirage7–130.038%11 May
inferno6–13-0.0525%11 May
nuke3–60.086%9 May
ancient9–130.039%7 May
nuke4–13-0.0717%7 May
dust213–90.019%7 May
mirage13–30.0723%6 May
inferno13–40.0311%6 May
dust28–130.017%6 May
nuke13–100.0513%4 May
inferno13–60.0213%3 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →