nero

nero — CS2 Stats

76561198005764003[U:1:45498275]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,400Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,669Hours in CS9Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating16,264Purple band · top ~23.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5293 of 8552 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGneroFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER16,264 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning53
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44515Last 10044%Win rateWWLWLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.5
Aggression6.4
Utility4.7
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels2.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning5.3
Utility4.7
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact0.6

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time543ms−47ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 543ms
Headshot accuracy26.5%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 24.6% → last ⅓ avg 26.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — anubis 13–4
133Biggest win — cache
4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
95In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 55% over 11infernoWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B29141548%-0.02
cacheC25101540%-0.02
mirageC167944%-0.02
nukeA116555%-0.03
infernoC83538%-0.03
train31233%0.01
ancient3030%0.01
anubis220100%0.11
overpass21150%-0.03
agency1010%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

81,637Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
4,337Matches
44.6%Match win rate
45.9%Headshot %
13.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
9,718MVPs
2,309Hours (in match)
4,329Bombs planted
884Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4720,579
AWP16,105
SSG 082,591
P2501,840
Knife1,289
AUG1,208

Lifetime map wins

7,239dust2
4,137nuke
3,670inferno
3,442train
1,656vertigo
397cbble
307office
178dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

167Matches
53%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.0%Headshot accuracy
30.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
26.6%Spray accuracy
75.8%Counter-strafing
7.3°Preaim
537msReaction time
19.3%T opening success
57.9%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
8.3%Flash assists
11.33HE damage / grenade
7.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.3253% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–80.0336%27 Aug
cache13–30.0829%27 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0320%27 Aug
dust213–6-0.0722%27 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0121%27 Aug
dust28–13-0.0622%27 Aug
mirage8–130.0229%26 Aug
train13–110.0348%26 Aug
dust24–13-0.0438%26 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0629%25 Aug
cache10–13-0.078%25 Aug
dust210–130.0521%25 Aug
dust29–13-0.0326%23 Aug
dust213–9-0.0121%22 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0015%20 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0225%11 Aug
cache7–13-0.0025%11 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0340%8 Aug
dust213–3-0.0460%8 Aug
cache2–13-0.0331%8 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0320%7 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0530%7 Aug
dust213–6-0.028%6 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0342%6 Aug
cache7–13-0.0332%5 Aug
cache13–9-0.0225%5 Aug
ancient3–110.0427%4 Aug
dust210–13-0.0121%4 Aug
cache5–13-0.0639%3 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0612%2 Aug
dust28–13-0.0715%2 Aug
anubis13–40.1929%2 Aug
cache3–13-0.0913%31 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0428%31 Jul
dust210–13-0.0519%31 Jul
cache9–13-0.0619%31 Jul
inferno13–40.0026%31 Jul
cache13–11-0.0136%31 Jul
nuke2–13-0.1225%31 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0721%24 Jul
cache8–130.0028%24 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0725%24 Jul
dust21–13-0.0910%23 Jul
cache16–14-0.0634%23 Jul
mirage13–80.0321%22 Jul
dust213–80.0233%22 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0413%22 Jul
dust27–13-0.0515%22 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0722%14 Jul
cache3–13-0.0620%24 Jun
cache13–8-0.0320%24 Jun
dust26–13-0.0117%18 Jun
dust213–9-0.0113%18 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0131%21 May
cache10–130.0319%19 May
cache7–00.0850%19 May
cache4–13-0.1413%17 May
cache13–6-0.0428%17 May
cache13–11-0.0033%17 May
cache11–13-0.0430%8 May
cache13–80.0131%3 May
cache13–70.0128%2 May
cache7–13-0.0817%2 May
cache11–13-0.018%2 May
cache12–120.0920%29 Apr
overpass13–100.0024%12 Mar
dust27–13-0.0314%12 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0127%27 Feb
train12–120.0122%27 Feb
mirage12–12-0.0217%26 Feb
dust213–9-0.0121%24 Feb
nuke6–13-0.067%24 Feb
mirage4–13-0.0611%23 Feb
mirage13–40.0638%22 Feb
dust213–50.0219%22 Feb
dust213–60.0421%22 Feb
nuke15–15-0.0336%22 Feb
ancient8–13-0.0117%20 Feb
dust28–130.0139%20 Feb
dust23–13-0.0925%20 Feb
inferno16–14-0.0214%18 Feb
nuke13–110.0328%18 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0324%17 Feb
nuke13–40.0420%9 Feb
dust213–70.0533%20 Jan
dust213–11-0.0227%14 Jan
dust211–13-0.0313%18 Dec
train11–13-0.0340%12 Dec
mirage12–12-0.0225%1 Nov
overpass7–13-0.0629%27 Oct
nuke13–9-0.0126%15 Oct
inferno10–13-0.0219%12 Oct
dust213–3-0.0019%12 Oct
mirage13–7-0.0421%12 Oct
dust211–130.0225%11 Oct
mirage13–4-0.0832%9 Sept
nuke13–60.0126%9 Sept
agency9–130.0430%9 Sept
dust213–100.0429%9 Sept
dust213–80.0632%7 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →