Special Agent Frank Lundy — CS2 Stats

76561198000549382[U:1:40283654]

1,053Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,519Hours in CS13Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 Solid
Premier CS Rating19,783Purple band · top ~9.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2426 of 5352 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=201), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate34.2%48.1%13.9% short
Shot accuracy8.4%12.9%4.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.931.080.15 short
Match win rate37.2%46.5%9.3% short

This profile sits below the typical Pink band player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSpecial Agent Frank LundyPREMIER19,783 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim57
Positioning55
Utility75

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56377Last 10056%Win rateLLWWWLTWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.7
Aggression6.7
Utility7.5
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels2.9

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 558ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.7
Positioning5.5
Utility7.5
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact7.9

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time561ms−10ms
first ⅓ avg 572ms → last ⅓ avg 561ms
Headshot accuracy7.8%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 9.6% → last ⅓ avg 7.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — dust2 13–8
130Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
133In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 78% over 9anubisWeakest map · 45% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A26161062%-0.00
ancientB189950%-0.00
cacheB158753%0.00
anubisB115645%0.01
nukeA106460%-0.02
infernoB105550%-0.01
mirageS97278%0.01
overpass1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

38,613Lifetime kills
0.93K/D
2,350Matches
37.2%Match win rate
34.2%Headshot %
8.4%Shot accuracy
3,362MVPs
1,141Hours (in match)
2,618Bombs planted
648Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4711,588
P901,543
MP91,302
P2501,061
AWP840

Lifetime map wins

5,883dust2
2,687nuke
2,658inferno
308train
180vertigo
71office
41italy
41lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

7.8%Headshot accuracy
33.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.4%Spray accuracy
77.1%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
558msReaction time
32.5%T opening success
50.8%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
11.57HE damage / grenade
13.92Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 7.7828% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.4614% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis9–13-0.014%26 Aug
nuke8–13-0.084%26 Aug
dust213–100.048%26 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0014%25 Aug
dust213–110.0318%25 Aug
ancient5–13-0.028%25 Aug
inferno15–15-0.004%24 Aug
cache13–7-0.038%23 Aug
nuke13–11-0.064%23 Aug
inferno13–60.004%23 Aug
cache16–13-0.0614%19 Aug
nuke9–130.0210%19 Aug
inferno7–13-0.095%18 Aug
anubis13–110.017%17 Aug
ancient13–7-0.030%17 Aug
anubis13–110.020%16 Aug
dust213–100.029%16 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0216%14 Aug
anubis9–13-0.066%14 Aug
dust213–3-0.059%12 Aug
cache13–30.004%12 Aug
dust210–13-0.1114%11 Aug
inferno8–13-0.015%11 Aug
nuke6–13-0.048%11 Aug
anubis11–13-0.034%27 Jul
cache13–40.0318%27 Jul
dust25–13-0.0210%24 Jul
ancient6–130.0411%23 Jul
ancient13–11-0.027%21 Jul
ancient13–110.021%20 Jul
anubis8–130.0912%16 Jul
cache13–60.077%16 Jul
ancient12–12-0.014%14 Jul
dust210–130.0015%14 Jul
nuke13–100.1010%13 Jul
inferno7–13-0.011%13 Jul
dust213–80.0310%11 Jul
anubis9–130.013%9 Jul
nuke16–12-0.028%9 Jul
ancient12–120.098%9 Jul
dust26–13-0.029%8 Jul
ancient9–130.023%8 Jul
cache7–13-0.032%8 Jul
anubis12–12-0.014%8 Jul
ancient9–13-0.039%3 Jul
dust26–13-0.0016%3 Jul
dust25–130.0215%1 Jul
cache9–130.0411%1 Jul
dust28–130.019%8 Jun
nuke13–70.0112%8 Jun
ancient1–13-0.1313%5 Jun
cache6–130.0110%5 Jun
dust213–11-0.017%4 Jun
ancient13–60.0311%4 Jun
mirage13–4-0.034%4 Jun
dust213–80.0114%12 May
cache13–3-0.0119%11 May
nuke4–13-0.052%11 May
dust213–30.079%10 May
nuke13–1-0.0518%10 May
cache12–12-0.0211%10 May
cache12–12-0.0210%9 May
dust24–13-0.039%9 May
ancient13–30.020%9 May
dust213–5-0.0114%9 May
cache8–130.0310%7 May
dust213–80.1515%7 May
cache5–13-0.0118%4 May
cache13–50.038%29 Apr
cache13–6-0.026%29 Apr
dust213–100.019%28 Apr
mirage13–80.018%28 Apr
ancient13–60.0511%28 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0611%25 Apr
ancient16–14-0.022%25 Apr
mirage13–8-0.027%24 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0518%24 Apr
mirage13–70.076%22 Apr
anubis13–80.0610%22 Apr
ancient7–130.025%22 Apr
overpass11–13-0.015%20 Apr
mirage13–2-0.039%20 Apr
dust213–9-0.0212%14 Apr
ancient13–9-0.018%14 Apr
mirage13–10.1114%12 Apr
dust211–13-0.0518%11 Apr
inferno13–110.038%11 Apr
dust27–13-0.0711%10 Apr
ancient13–8-0.0714%10 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0111%8 Apr
dust213–9-0.0511%8 Apr
nuke13–11-0.005%3 Apr
inferno13–110.005%3 Apr
dust213–90.0012%3 Apr
mirage12–12-0.019%3 Apr
anubis13–11-0.004%2 Apr
dust213–00.009%2 Apr
mirage13–50.0310%2 Apr
anubis13–50.048%30 Mar
dust213–9-0.0312%30 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →