TJEKKISK RAKET — CS2 Stats

76561198000180976[U:1:39915248]Steam profile ↗

1,968Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since

5,638Hours in CS

CSDB Rating6.2 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating18,752Purple band · top ~13.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#21445 of 47103 tracked

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=5,002), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Purple band median	Pink band median	vs Pink band
Headshot rate	45.5%	44.2%	47.1%	1.6% short
Shot accuracy	18.5%	11.6%	12.8%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.04	1.03	1.08	0.04 short
Match win rate	47.3%	45.2%	46.6%	meets

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83

Positioning51

Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–46Last 10054%Win rateLLLLWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.3

Aggression5.9

Utility5.0

Positioning5.1

Opening Duels2.0

Clutch4.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 594ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3

Positioning5.1

Utility5.0

Mechanics7.0

Opening Duels2.1

Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time604ms−11ms

first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 604ms

Headshot accuracy23.3%+4.3%

first ⅓ avg 19.0% → last ⅓ avg 23.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — dust2 13–5

13–0Biggest win — nuke

6Longest win streak

L4Current streak

9–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 83% over 12anubisWeakest map · 36% over 14

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	24	12–12	50%	0.01
dust2	S	18	12–6	67%	0.02
anubis	C	14	5–9	36%	0.01
nuke	B	14	7–7	50%	0.02
ancient	C	12	5–7	42%	-0.01
cache	S	12	10–2	83%	0.03
inferno	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.03
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	0.05
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

244,387Lifetime kills

1.04K/D · Top 50% of Purple band

9,440Matches

47.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Purple band

45.5%Headshot % · Top 50% of Purple band

18.5%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Purple band

29,511MVPs

5,638Hours (in match)

10,827Bombs planted

3,193Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4784,222

AWP52,545

M4A4 / M4A1-S29,392

Desert Eagle21,759

P2000 / USP-S13,920

Glock-186,613

P2505,145

Knife4,636

SSG 082,701

MAC-102,544

Lifetime map wins

17,306dust2

16,752inferno

10,069nuke

5,337train

2,412vertigo

1,714cbble

149aztec

121office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,140Matches

51%Win rate

1.19Avg K/D

79.9ADR

41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win

17%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	138	55%	1.14	17.5
Dust2	91	52%	1.03	16.2
Ancient	83	42%	0.98	15.4
Nuke	69	49%	1.15	16.7
Anubis	67	40%	1.12	17.1
Inferno	55	60%	1.10	16.1
Overpass	14	50%	0.96	16.4
Cache	8	75%	1.19	14.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.7%Headshot accuracy

36.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.8%Spray accuracy

81.4%Counter-strafing

8.0°Preaim

594msReaction time

29.2%T opening success

47.1%CT opening success

0.55Enemies flashed / flash

2.7%Flash assists

10.52HE damage / grenade

8.30Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 29.2415% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	3–13	-0.05	30%	17 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.00	20%	17 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.11	22%	17 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.04	15%	16 Aug →
dust2	16–14	-0.05	19%	16 Aug →
ancient	4–13	0.02	18%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.03	32%	15 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.04	15%	11 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.01	21%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.03	26%	11 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.01	38%	11 Aug →
nuke	16–14	-0.04	18%	10 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.07	18%	10 Aug →
inferno	22–19	0.02	31%	7 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.06	31%	7 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.00	15%	7 Aug →
vertigo	10–13	0.05	23%	6 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.01	24%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.05	19%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.10	22%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.08	29%	4 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.01	16%	2 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.13	28%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.05	21%	2 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.03	19%	30 Jul →
cache	13–7	-0.07	14%	30 Jul →
nuke	8–13	0.02	17%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.01	16%	28 Jul →
anubis	5–13	0.05	24%	28 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.00	43%	28 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.06	22%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	48%	27 Jul →
nuke	13–0	0.02	16%	27 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.05	21%	27 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	31%	26 Jul →
nuke	14–16	-0.02	27%	26 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.07	24%	26 Jul →
nuke	8–13	0.02	9%	6 Jul →
overpass	13–4	0.04	12%	6 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.02	32%	6 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.02	19%	6 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	20%	10 Jun →
nuke	13–3	0.15	30%	8 Jun →
cache	13–6	0.11	25%	8 Jun →
mirage	13–1	0.12	39%	8 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.12	42%	8 Jun →
dust2	5–0	-0.01	13%	8 Jun →
ancient	5–13	-0.02	28%	7 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.16	44%	3 Jun →
cache	8–13	-0.07	21%	23 May →
inferno	12–16	-0.06	20%	23 May →
ancient	13–9	0.01	21%	23 May →
cache	13–5	0.09	25%	19 May →
anubis	13–11	0.06	25%	19 May →
cache	13–7	0.06	33%	10 May →
anubis	9–13	0.01	13%	10 May →
cache	16–14	-0.04	10%	10 May →
mirage	3–13	-0.08	23%	10 May →
ancient	11–13	-0.08	17%	8 May →
mirage	8–13	0.01	22%	24 Apr →
dust2	12–16	0.06	24%	24 Apr →
dust2	10–13	0.01	19%	24 Apr →
ancient	7–13	0.03	21%	19 Apr →
dust2	13–16	-0.05	31%	17 Mar →
mirage	13–11	0.02	15%	16 Mar →
ancient	9–13	-0.06	23%	16 Mar →
inferno	13–10	-0.02	5%	14 Mar →
ancient	13–6	-0.09	15%	14 Mar →
anubis	13–11	-0.06	12%	14 Mar →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	11%	14 Mar →
mirage	19–17	-0.00	16%	12 Mar →
anubis	13–4	-0.03	25%	6 Mar →
dust2	13–6	0.08	29%	6 Mar →
dust2	9–13	-0.07	11%	6 Mar →
ancient	11–13	-0.02	14%	2 Mar →
mirage	13–6	0.02	9%	2 Mar →
nuke	13–11	0.03	22%	2 Mar →
anubis	14–16	0.03	15%	1 Mar →
mirage	14–16	0.04	20%	1 Mar →
ancient	13–3	0.06	19%	26 Feb →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	13%	15 Feb →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	10%	15 Feb →
anubis	7–13	-0.02	23%	15 Feb →
dust2	13–10	0.04	24%	15 Feb →
anubis	11–13	0.01	19%	13 Feb →
nuke	7–13	-0.01	27%	13 Feb →
mirage	13–16	-0.01	21%	13 Feb →
nuke	9–13	0.04	19%	10 Feb →
anubis	13–9	0.04	14%	10 Feb →
mirage	13–8	0.00	19%	9 Feb →
mirage	16–12	0.01	26%	9 Feb →
nuke	13–6	0.02	16%	9 Feb →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	34%	7 Feb →
ancient	13–7	-0.02	11%	7 Feb →
anubis	10–13	-0.01	20%	7 Feb →
mirage	13–5	-0.00	16%	7 Feb →
nuke	11–13	0.04	27%	7 Feb →
anubis	13–3	0.08	10%	6 Feb →
mirage	13–10	0.01	29%	6 Feb →
ancient	13–8	0.00	28%	6 Feb →