Thorsen

Thorsen — CS2 Stats

DK76561198065062887[U:1:104797159]Steam profile ↗

1,419Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.8 Developing
Premier CS Rating22,294Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#11580 of 44137 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGThorsenPREMIER22,294 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim50
Positioning54
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45505Last 10045%Win rateWLWLWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.0
Aggression6.3
Utility4.8
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 588ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.0
Positioning5.4
Utility4.8
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time590ms+4ms
first ⅓ avg 586ms → last ⅓ avg 590ms
Headshot accuracy18.2%−4.7%
first ⅓ avg 23.0% → last ⅓ avg 18.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — mirage 13–3
130Biggest win — nuke
3Longest win streak
911In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 60% over 20anubisWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB28141450%-0.01
nukeA2012860%0.00
cacheB1910953%-0.02
infernoD124833%-0.02
dust2D113827%-0.03
anubisD5050%-0.06
overpass220100%-0.02
vertigo1010%-0.02
fachwerk1010%-0.00
debris1010%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,170Matches
51%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
69.6ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno3661%0.9715.1
Nuke3070%0.9314.4
Mirage2959%1.1216.4
Ancient1533%0.6610.9
Overpass1242%0.9916.4
Dust21145%1.1615.0
Anubis1030%0.8114.0
Vertigo650%0.7613.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.8%Headshot accuracy
29.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.9%Spray accuracy
74.0%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
588msReaction time
25.6%T opening success
50.2%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
11.81HE damage / grenade
7.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4852 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.5969% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–4-0.0610%28 Aug
cache11–13-0.0433%28 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0117%28 Aug
cache10–130.0011%28 Aug
nuke13–40.0321%28 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0322%23 Aug
mirage13–110.0217%23 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0425%20 Aug
cache2–13-0.0621%20 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0713%20 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0710%20 Aug
cache1–13-0.0116%18 Aug
mirage15–150.0013%16 Aug
mirage3–130.0121%16 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0919%11 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0328%11 Aug
cache11–130.0530%7 Aug
inferno22–19-0.0517%7 Aug
cache13–60.0412%7 Aug
nuke13–60.0631%7 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0013%7 Aug
vertigo10–13-0.0215%6 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0017%6 Aug
cache13–11-0.0716%2 Aug
cache13–90.0115%2 Aug
mirage13–9-0.009%2 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0611%30 Jul
cache13–7-0.0514%30 Jul
nuke8–130.0221%28 Jul
mirage13–100.0318%28 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0523%28 Jul
cache6–13-0.1029%28 Jul
dust211–13-0.0514%27 Jul
dust213–9-0.0510%27 Jul
nuke13–00.0925%27 Jul
inferno9–130.0326%27 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0610%26 Jul
nuke14–16-0.0416%26 Jul
cache13–5-0.0024%26 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0511%24 Jul
mirage13–110.0320%24 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0213%24 Jul
nuke16–14-0.0016%24 Jul
cache15–15-0.049%22 Jul
dust25–13-0.098%22 Jul
nuke16–13-0.0131%21 Jul
mirage13–110.029%21 Jul
cache13–100.0110%21 Jul
dust210–130.0026%21 Jul
fachwerk12–12-0.0024%19 Jul
mirage13–30.1629%19 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0513%19 Jul
mirage13–90.0110%19 Jul
mirage7–130.0124%19 Jul
inferno9–130.0117%18 Jul
cache13–70.0314%18 Jul
dust213–60.0618%18 Jul
mirage14–160.0126%18 Jul
cache13–11-0.0310%17 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0214%17 Jul
mirage16–12-0.073%16 Jul
anubis4–13-0.126%16 Jul
dust28–13-0.0518%13 Jul
cache13–10-0.0517%13 Jul
inferno13–16-0.0417%10 Jul
cache6–13-0.0412%10 Jul
mirage13–2-0.0417%10 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0018%10 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0318%10 Jul
debris3–90.0029%9 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0538%6 Jul
dust23–13-0.0116%5 Jul
cache5–13-0.0119%5 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0024%5 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0219%4 Jul
overpass13–10-0.0323%4 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0227%4 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0318%4 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0115%4 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0641%4 Jul
nuke13–30.0424%4 Jul
overpass13–4-0.0218%26 Jun
nuke12–16-0.0437%26 Jun
inferno2–13-0.0322%26 Jun
dust211–13-0.0327%26 Jun
mirage16–140.0126%16 Jun
dust27–13-0.0215%16 Jun
mirage14–16-0.0616%14 Jun
nuke13–50.0828%14 Jun
cache13–8-0.0423%14 Jun
inferno15–15-0.0121%13 Jun
inferno13–40.0126%13 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0031%8 Jun
mirage10–130.0130%8 Jun
inferno13–6-0.0221%8 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0221%6 Jun
nuke13–60.1017%6 Jun
inferno13–30.0120%20 May
dust22–13-0.0513%17 May
mirage9–13-0.0220%17 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →