(TZ) Drunkenmonkey — CS2 Stats

76561197973793226[U:1:13527498]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,902Tracked matches41%Win rate2021Tracked since

999Hours in CS

CSDB Rating4.0 Developing

Premier CS Rating6,216Light Blue band · top ~73% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#11479 of 15151 tracked

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim46

Positioning50

Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD41–53–6Last 10041%Win rateLLLWLLWTLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.6

Aggression8.7

Utility6.0

Positioning5.0

Opening Duels3.5

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 685ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.6

Positioning5.0

Utility6.0

Mechanics4.1

Opening Duels3.5

Win Impact1.9

Composite 4.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time693ms+12ms

first ⅓ avg 681ms → last ⅓ avg 693ms

Headshot accuracy21.1%+1.6%

first ⅓ avg 19.6% → last ⅓ avg 21.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — mirage 16–14

13–2Biggest win — cache

5Longest win streak

L3Current streak

9–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 80% over 5dust2Weakest map · 32% over 22

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	D	32	11–21	34%	-0.01
dust2	D	22	7–15	32%	-0.01
cache	C	12	5–7	42%	-0.02
nuke	A	11	6–5	55%	-0.01
ancient	A	11	6–5	55%	-0.00
anubis	S	5	4–1	80%	-0.02
inferno	—	4	2–2	50%	0.00
overpass	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (32% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

36,400Lifetime kills

0.85K/D

2,857Matches

39.4%Match win rate

42.2%Headshot %

10.0%Shot accuracy

3,575MVPs

999Hours (in match)

2,583Bombs planted

508Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-477,755

M4A4 / M4A1-S5,009

SSG 083,398

AWP2,730

P2000 / USP-S2,647

Desert Eagle2,513

MAC-102,333

Glock-181,831

MAG-7721

XM1014675

Lifetime map wins

4,408dust2

2,994inferno

1,797nuke

1,056vertigo

303train

190office

127italy

80assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.5%Headshot accuracy

30.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

34.1%Spray accuracy

68.3%Counter-strafing

10.6°Preaim

685msReaction time

49.0%T opening success

39.4%CT opening success

0.70Enemies flashed / flash

5.1%Flash assists

8.48HE damage / grenade

8.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.
CT opening duels 39.3958% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

32% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	6–13	-0.04	26%	27 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.05	17%	23 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.03	24%	22 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.03	24%	22 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	21%	22 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.05	22%	20 Aug →
cache	13–2	-0.05	17%	19 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.02	20%	19 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	32%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.00	11%	17 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.02	33%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.01	19%	16 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.02	12%	14 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.01	9%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	33%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.03	26%	11 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.05	21%	10 Aug →
mirage	16–14	0.10	30%	10 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	17%	9 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	23%	9 Aug →
nuke	12–16	-0.01	24%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.05	30%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.01	14%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.05	18%	7 Aug →
mirage	15–15	-0.05	20%	7 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.00	30%	6 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.08	8%	2 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.06	17%	1 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	31%	30 Jul →
cache	16–13	0.03	14%	30 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.05	12%	29 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.02	26%	29 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.03	18%	29 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.03	26%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.03	31%	28 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.03	20%	28 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.01	17%	28 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.08	25%	27 Jul →
ancient	4–13	0.00	15%	27 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.06	12%	27 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.07	11%	26 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.05	32%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.03	23%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.01	31%	25 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.02	13%	25 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.02	25%	24 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.02	23%	24 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.02	29%	23 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.06	15%	23 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.06	41%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.02	30%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.05	32%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.04	8%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.04	34%	20 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.01	14%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.00	17%	19 Jul →
ancient	0–13	-0.04	5%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–4	-0.02	12%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.03	17%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–16	0.02	33%	17 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.00	34%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–5	-0.03	35%	16 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.03	22%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.04	38%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–3	-0.04	10%	13 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.04	23%	13 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.03	24%	12 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.05	19%	12 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.05	25%	12 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.03	10%	12 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.04	15%	9 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.05	19%	9 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.00	26%	9 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.01	24%	8 Jun →
overpass	5–13	-0.05	33%	8 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	12%	8 Jun →
nuke	13–7	-0.10	9%	5 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	20%	3 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	21%	2 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.06	14%	2 Jun →
nuke	13–11	-0.01	30%	1 Jun →
inferno	15–15	0.03	20%	1 Jun →
overpass	11–13	-0.03	17%	1 Jun →
mirage	14–16	-0.02	25%	1 Jun →
mirage	12–16	-0.03	22%	1 Jun →
anubis	13–8	0.03	18%	31 May →
dust2	13–11	-0.04	30%	31 May →
mirage	2–13	-0.05	17%	31 May →
mirage	5–13	-0.09	32%	29 May →
nuke	15–15	-0.01	21%	29 May →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	24%	29 May →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	7%	29 May →
mirage	6–13	-0.06	0%	26 May →
mirage	10–13	-0.00	15%	24 May →
dust2	6–13	-0.09	19%	24 May →
mirage	13–7	0.05	26%	24 May →
dust2	10–13	0.02	36%	22 May →
overpass	3–13	-0.13	14%	22 May →
dust2	16–14	0.01	15%	22 May →
anubis	13–10	-0.02	10%	22 May →