stev9 シ — CS2 Stats

76561197964660926[U:1:4395198]✓ No bans

2,164Tracked matches41%Win rate2023Tracked since

1,002Hours in CS

CSDB Rating6.0 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating22,610Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#6971 of 26158 tracked

FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,146), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 8 median	Level 9 median	vs Level 9
Headshot rate	63.4%	47.2%	49.0%	above
Shot accuracy	5.6%	12.3%	13.1%	7.5% short
Kill/death ratio	1.34	1.07	1.08	above
Match win rate	51.1%	46.3%	46.9%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89

Positioning51

Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47–49–4Last 10047%Win rateLWTWLLLLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.9

Aggression7.1

Utility4.0

Positioning5.1

Opening Duels2.9

Clutch6.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 578ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9

Positioning5.1

Utility4.0

Mechanics7.3

Opening Duels3.0

Win Impact2.1

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time569ms−18ms

first ⅓ avg 588ms → last ⅓ avg 569ms

Headshot accuracy28.3%−0.9%

first ⅓ avg 29.2% → last ⅓ avg 28.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.27Best rating — poseidon 9–3

13–2Biggest win — dust2

5Longest win streak

5–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

4Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 64% over 11mirageWeakest map · 20% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	27	16–11	59%	0.01
inferno	C	26	9–17	35%	0.01
ancient	B	16	8–8	50%	-0.00
nuke	A	11	7–4	64%	0.05
cache	C	8	3–5	38%	-0.00
mirage	D	5	1–4	20%	0.02
anubis	—	4	1–3	25%	0.02
overpass	—	2	1–1	50%	0.08
poseidon	—	1	1–0	100%	0.27

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

58,540Lifetime kills

1.34K/D · Top 25% of Level 8 players

2,787Matches

51.1%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 8 players

63.4%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 8 players

5.6%Shot accuracy

8,639MVPs

1,002Hours (in match)

1,936Bombs planted

547Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4717,079

M4A4 / M4A1-S14,414

P2000 / USP-S5,323

AWP5,111

Glock-183,728

Desert Eagle3,726

Galil AR2,109

MP71,119

MAC-10965

FAMAS927

Lifetime map wins

8,420inferno

5,206dust2

2,726nuke

1,308vertigo

428train

235office

107italy

49dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

86Matches

60%Win rate

1.47Avg K/D

93.2ADR

59%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

54%1v1 clutch win

13%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	22	41%	0.98	17.2
Dust2	20	70%	1.30	17.4
Anubis	11	64%	1.56	21.1
Nuke	11	73%	2.04	17.2
Ancient	9	67%	1.46	19.2
Inferno	9	44%	2.22	21.9
Cache	1	100%	1.45	16.0
Train	1	100%	1.78	16.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.0%Headshot accuracy

37.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.2%Spray accuracy

82.8%Counter-strafing

8.1°Preaim

578msReaction time

28.9%T opening success

54.2%CT opening success

0.56Enemies flashed / flash

3.9%Flash assists

5.37HE damage / grenade

3.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 3.4295 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.9033% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	9–13	0.05	26%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.00	38%	25 Aug →
mirage	15–15	0.04	23%	19 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.07	25%	14 Aug →
inferno	6–13	0.13	35%	14 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.02	31%	12 Aug →
cache	5–13	0.03	38%	12 Aug →
inferno	3–9	-0.08	38%	11 Aug →
inferno	8–8	0.01	24%	11 Aug →
ancient	6–13	0.04	22%	10 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.03	32%	10 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.10	23%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.01	19%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.04	24%	7 Aug →
inferno	6–9	-0.04	30%	6 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.05	20%	24 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.03	40%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–5	-0.03	25%	24 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.01	17%	23 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.02	19%	23 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.02	29%	23 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.02	31%	22 Jul →
ancient	4–13	0.02	24%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.07	35%	21 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.04	31%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.03	36%	20 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.07	38%	20 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.06	22%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.08	19%	19 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.03	26%	19 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.08	26%	19 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.03	28%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.03	39%	18 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.03	22%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.01	18%	18 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.06	32%	18 Jul →
nuke	9–5	0.17	40%	18 Jul →
anubis	15–15	0.06	34%	17 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.05	17%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.09	28%	17 Jul →
ancient	16–13	-0.02	29%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.12	22%	16 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.03	29%	16 Jul →
overpass	7–9	0.12	20%	16 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.05	18%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.00	26%	14 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.00	26%	14 Jul →
inferno	15–15	0.03	39%	13 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.04	17%	13 Jul →
ancient	2–13	-0.07	40%	12 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.05	26%	12 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.02	39%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–5	-0.07	38%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.13	16%	12 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.06	34%	12 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	30%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.08	24%	11 Jul →
overpass	9–4	0.05	32%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.02	28%	11 Jul →
nuke	9–7	0.05	27%	11 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.01	24%	10 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	14%	10 Jul →
ancient	1–13	-0.02	29%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.05	36%	10 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.08	30%	10 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.01	16%	10 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.08	26%	9 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.08	33%	9 Jul →
inferno	13–4	-0.01	26%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–6	-0.01	29%	8 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.05	24%	8 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.08	21%	7 Jul →
inferno	3–13	-0.02	24%	7 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.06	32%	6 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.05	9%	6 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.06	30%	6 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.01	36%	6 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.02	27%	5 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.04	38%	5 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.09	63%	5 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.05	35%	4 Jul →
inferno	3–13	0.02	23%	4 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.04	28%	4 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.03	32%	3 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.00	29%	3 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.12	33%	3 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	16%	3 Jul →
nuke	5–9	0.00	26%	3 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.05	31%	2 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	23%	2 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	11%	2 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.02	34%	1 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.01	24%	1 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.03	25%	1 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.03	17%	30 Jun →
dust2	7–13	0.02	39%	30 Jun →
inferno	8–13	-0.04	38%	26 Jun →
poseidon	9–3	0.27	58%	26 Jun →
inferno	5–9	0.00	38%	26 Jun →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	14%	22 Jun →