runq

runq — CS2 Stats

FI76561197963597854[U:1:3332126]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,124Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,609Hours in CS7Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating19,107Purple band · top ~12.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#9461 of 19410 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,179 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGrunqFACEITLevel 5 · 1,179 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER19,107 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning40
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44506Last 10044%Win rateWWWLLTTLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6
Aggression5.3
Utility5.9
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning4.0
Utility5.9
Mechanics4.2
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact7.4

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time554ms−64ms
first ⅓ avg 618ms → last ⅓ avg 554ms
Headshot accuracy20.0%−4.4%
first ⅓ avg 24.4% → last ⅓ avg 20.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — poseidon 9–1
132Biggest win — train
4Longest win streak
W3Current streak
68In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 67% over 12poseidonWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC1971237%-0.01
infernoA159660%-0.02
mirageS128467%-0.00
nukeC114736%-0.04
poseidonD93633%-0.02
anubisD93633%-0.03
cacheB63350%0.01
dust2D62433%-0.01
overpassC52340%-0.02
sanctum42250%0.00
train110100%0.04
alpine1010%-0.06
warden1010%0.00
stronghold1010%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

59,551Lifetime kills
0.94K/D
3,472Matches
41.4%Match win rate
41.3%Headshot %
11.1%Shot accuracy
6,190MVPs
1,447Hours (in match)
4,231Bombs planted
801Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

6,492inferno
2,961nuke
2,565dust2
2,127train
609vertigo
170cbble
74office
48dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

442Matches
51%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
77.0ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5444%0.9013.1
Ancient5056%0.9814.6
Inferno4351%1.2214.3
Nuke3962%1.1614.4
Anubis2752%1.0114.8
Train1644%1.1416.4
Dust21136%1.1313.9
Overpass667%1.1716.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy
33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.4%Spray accuracy
69.1%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
549msReaction time
22.9%T opening success
43.5%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
3.1%Flash assists
10.04HE damage / grenade
15.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4988 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.8931% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–7-0.068%26 Aug
cache13–40.0143%24 Aug
ancient13–90.0217%24 Aug
dust28–13-0.0525%24 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0213%19 Aug
dust212–12-0.0113%19 Aug
inferno8–8-0.1214%19 Aug
poseidon2–9-0.2033%19 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0112%17 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0733%17 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0933%17 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0320%13 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0438%13 Aug
cache13–9-0.0131%10 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0412%10 Aug
nuke13–80.0117%10 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0210%7 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0715%7 Aug
inferno13–90.030%7 Aug
ancient13–50.0612%7 Aug
cache10–13-0.088%7 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0220%7 Aug
mirage13–110.0119%7 Aug
overpass13–6-0.0515%7 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0630%7 Aug
train13–20.0418%7 Aug
inferno6–13-0.088%6 Aug
ancient12–12-0.0211%6 Aug
ancient13–110.0240%27 Apr
inferno13–80.0113%27 Apr
cache10–130.009%26 Apr
inferno13–90.0367%26 Apr
cache10–130.023%26 Apr
cache13–50.1416%26 Apr
anubis13–100.0115%26 Apr
nuke9–130.0433%26 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0314%25 Apr
inferno13–70.0122%25 Apr
nuke13–110.0130%25 Apr
ancient13–11-0.047%25 Apr
ancient13–110.0013%24 Apr
sanctum6–9-0.060%24 Apr
poseidon9–10.1622%24 Apr
ancient16–130.0217%12 Apr
mirage5–130.0217%7 Apr
nuke2–13-0.0717%7 Apr
anubis12–160.0321%7 Apr
overpass6–13-0.0119%7 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0115%6 Apr
mirage13–50.0327%6 Apr
ancient13–7-0.0040%3 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0329%1 Apr
dust29–13-0.0418%1 Apr
anubis4–13-0.0913%1 Apr
inferno13–70.0726%1 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0220%1 Apr
overpass2–13-0.0116%28 Mar
ancient7–13-0.0615%28 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0120%15 Mar
nuke7–13-0.0920%15 Mar
alpine6–13-0.0611%13 Mar
warden7–130.0018%13 Mar
stronghold10–130.0424%13 Mar
ancient9–13-0.0420%13 Mar
mirage16–13-0.0219%13 Mar
anubis11–13-0.0715%11 Mar
mirage10–10.0029%11 Mar
inferno13–4-0.0133%11 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0315%11 Mar
dust216–12-0.0027%10 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0760%10 Mar
overpass10–13-0.0421%10 Mar
inferno13–9-0.0313%10 Mar
dust213–70.0926%10 Mar
sanctum5–9-0.0517%10 Mar
poseidon5–9-0.048%10 Mar
ancient10–13-0.0215%9 Mar
nuke13–10-0.0314%9 Mar
poseidon9–10.1314%9 Mar
overpass13–10-0.0127%8 Mar
ancient6–130.0220%8 Mar
nuke10–13-0.0821%8 Mar
dust211–13-0.056%8 Mar
mirage13–70.0114%8 Mar
nuke8–13-0.0233%8 Mar
anubis13–10-0.0315%8 Mar
mirage11–130.0110%5 Mar
mirage13–50.0144%5 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0019%5 Mar
poseidon3–9-0.0833%5 Mar
sanctum9–20.1639%5 Mar
poseidon8–8-0.1129%5 Mar
inferno8–80.1246%5 Mar
inferno13–16-0.0714%4 Mar
anubis13–110.0422%1 Mar
sanctum9–6-0.0330%1 Mar
poseidon8–8-0.0312%1 Mar
poseidon7–9-0.0233%1 Mar
poseidon9–50.0160%1 Mar
inferno13–7-0.0214%28 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →