Outboardbiscuit — CS2 Stats

76561197961264703[U:1:998975]

2,079Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since

2,887Hours in CS27Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating7.0 StrongHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating22,421Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#5749 of 19507 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,045 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median
Headshot rate	40.3%	52.8%
Shot accuracy	10.3%	13.7%
Kill/death ratio	1.30	1.08
Match win rate	51.7%	49.2%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90

Positioning52

Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58–37–5Last 10058%Win rateLLWLWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim9.0

Aggression5.7

Utility6.5

Positioning5.2

Opening Duels1.7

Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0

Positioning5.2

Utility6.5

Mechanics6.9

Opening Duels2.1

Win Impact9.4

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.04

Reaction time536ms−54ms

first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 536ms

Headshot accuracy27.2%+7.3%

first ⅓ avg 19.9% → last ⅓ avg 27.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — ancient 13–3

13–1Biggest win — cache

8Longest win streak

L2Current streak

6–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

17Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 68% over 25anubisWeakest map · 40% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	S	25	17–8	68%	0.04
ancient	A	22	14–8	64%	0.04
cache	A	18	11–7	61%	0.06
mirage	B	11	5–6	45%	0.02
inferno	C	9	4–5	44%	0.03
dust2	A	9	5–4	56%	0.01
anubis	C	5	2–3	40%	0.04
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

83,760Lifetime kills

1.30K/D · Top 25% of Level 10 players

4,046Matches

51.7%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 10 players

40.3%Headshot %

10.3%Shot accuracy

11,067MVPs

1,694Hours (in match)

5,762Bombs planted

1,494Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4724,288

M4A4 / M4A1-S14,889

Desert Eagle5,615

AWP5,351

P2000 / USP-S4,723

Glock-183,680

MP92,138

SSG 081,910

Negev1,871

MAC-101,716

Lifetime map wins

5,221nuke

4,093dust2

3,972inferno

3,383vertigo

1,064train

296office

253cbble

68lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

233Matches

62%Win rate

1.37Avg K/D

90.5ADR

48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win

28%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	40	55%	1.24	14.7
Ancient	37	65%	1.35	19.1
Nuke	32	66%	1.45	18.5
Anubis	28	75%	1.48	17.2
Inferno	22	64%	1.84	17.6
Cache	18	56%	1.23	17.3
Overpass	10	50%	1.22	15.9
Train	9	56%	1.45	16.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.9%Headshot accuracy

35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.3%Spray accuracy

81.0%Counter-strafing

7.8°Preaim

521msReaction time

26.6%T opening success

46.8%CT opening success

0.54Enemies flashed / flash

6.2%Flash assists

9.00HE damage / grenade

12.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 26.6152% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	0–7	-0.05	36%	25 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.08	24%	25 Aug →
ancient	19–16	0.05	25%	20 Aug →
ancient	12–16	-0.04	20%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.09	20%	20 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.06	29%	20 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.00	32%	20 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.04	25%	20 Aug →
dust2	5–0	-0.04	29%	20 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.06	36%	20 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.03	28%	20 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.02	33%	19 Aug →
nuke	12–16	0.04	24%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.03	23%	19 Aug →
cache	3–13	0.12	23%	18 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.00	44%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–5	-0.01	45%	18 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.06	25%	18 Aug →
cache	13–1	0.04	50%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.01	23%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.06	21%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.08	23%	15 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.02	17%	15 Aug →
vertigo	8–13	-0.03	33%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.19	39%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–2	0.12	11%	12 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.06	27%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.06	21%	11 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.02	20%	11 Aug →
cache	14–16	0.02	25%	11 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.02	27%	11 Aug →
inferno	16–12	0.05	27%	11 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.05	13%	10 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.08	25%	10 Aug →
ancient	13–5	-0.02	19%	10 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.11	29%	10 Aug →
ancient	15–15	-0.03	25%	10 Aug →
anubis	13–16	0.00	19%	10 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.07	47%	10 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.04	20%	10 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.08	20%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.14	22%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.05	7%	9 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.04	21%	8 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.07	27%	2 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.09	34%	2 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.08	24%	2 Aug →
nuke	15–15	0.01	22%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.12	10%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.06	8%	2 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.02	19%	29 Jul →
inferno	3–13	0.02	17%	29 Jul →
nuke	12–16	0.11	24%	28 Jul →
mirage	16–14	0.04	28%	27 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.01	10%	27 Jul →
dust2	2–13	0.04	20%	27 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.00	19%	27 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.05	5%	27 Jul →
dust2	15–15	0.01	9%	27 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.14	19%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.06	17%	26 Jul →
inferno	16–14	0.03	20%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–9	-0.01	15%	24 Jul →
mirage	12–16	0.03	16%	24 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.08	20%	24 Jul →
ancient	13–3	0.07	18%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–2	0.07	14%	24 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.02	18%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.05	19%	16 Jul →
ancient	15–15	0.02	15%	16 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.04	14%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.01	4%	14 Jul →
nuke	1–13	-0.07	0%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.01	24%	14 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.04	20%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.01	19%	13 Jul →
dust2	16–12	0.03	14%	12 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.15	14%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.09	8%	12 Jul →
nuke	3–13	0.02	21%	12 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.04	17%	12 Jul →
dust2	3–13	0.01	33%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–3	0.05	26%	11 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.02	21%	11 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.04	12%	11 Jul →
mirage	12–16	0.01	26%	11 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.06	10%	10 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.06	34%	10 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.01	14%	10 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.03	20%	10 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.00	30%	10 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.05	33%	10 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.08	19%	10 Jul →
ancient	13–3	0.10	14%	10 Jul →
ancient	4–12	-0.06	29%	10 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.03	25%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.10	36%	10 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.06	30%	10 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.03	20%	10 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.06	18%	10 Jul →