FLCN_Diddy — CS2 Stats
76561199879444551[U:1:1919178823]
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,109), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 9 median | Level 10 median | vs Level 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 41.1% | 49.0% | 52.0% | 11.0% short |
| Shot accuracy | 0.0% | 13.1% | 13.7% | 13.7% short |
| Kill/death ratio | 0.85 | 1.08 | 1.08 | 0.23 short |
| Match win rate | 38.8% | 46.9% | 48.8% | 10.0% short |
This profile sits below the typical Level 10 player on every metric we can compare.
Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.
Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match
Plays most like jL 94% playstyle similarity
Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.
Counter-strafing. 92% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.
Flashes. 0.77 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.
Areas to improve
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Reaction time. 564ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 7.6/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 63 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 mirage | S | 16 | 11–5 | 69% | 0.08 |
 dust2 | A | 13 | 8–5 | 62% | 0.08 |
 ancient | S | 11 | 8–3 | 73% | 0.07 |
 inferno | A | 8 | 5–3 | 63% | 0.09 |
 nuke | S | 8 | 7–1 | 88% | 0.03 |
 anubis | S | 5 | 4–1 | 80% | 0.09 |
 cache | — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | 0.12 |
| office | — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | 0.05 |
Across the last 63 tracked matches.
Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (62% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dust2 | 23 | 65% | 1.99 | 24.1 |
| Mirage | 18 | 56% | 2.02 | 26.0 |
| Ancient | 17 | 65% | 1.69 | 23.2 |
| Inferno | 14 | 86% | 2.10 | 26.6 |
| Nuke | 8 | 75% | 1.58 | 22.0 |
| Anubis | 3 | 33% | 1.69 | 18.7 |
| Overpass | 3 | 67% | 3.08 | 29.7 |
| Cache | 1 | 100% | 2.27 | 25.0 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 32.4699% — below the 40% mark we flag
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| inferno | 13–5 | 0.19 | 25% | 25 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 13–3 | 0.03 | 22% | 25 Jul → | |
| inferno | 8–13 | 0.03 | 17% | 25 Jul → | |
| anubis | 13–5 | 0.07 | 21% | 25 Jul → | |
| inferno | 10–13 | 0.11 | 21% | 25 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–4 | 0.05 | 11% | 4 Jul → | |
| anubis | 13–4 | 0.12 | 25% | 3 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 16–14 | 0.07 | 29% | 3 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–1 | 0.21 | 19% | 2 Jul → | |
| anubis | 9–13 | 0.01 | 14% | 2 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 13–7 | -0.00 | 24% | 2 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 13–8 | 0.05 | 22% | 2 Jul → | |
| ancient | 9–13 | 0.01 | 32% | 2 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–9 | 0.03 | 21% | 30 Jun → | |
| nuke | 10–8 | -0.07 | 19% | 30 Jun → | |
| ancient | 13–7 | 0.07 | 23% | 29 Jun → | |
| dust2 | 11–3 | 0.18 | 15% | 29 Jun → | |
| ancient | 13–8 | -0.02 | 8% | 28 Jun → | |
| ancient | 13–5 | 0.08 | 42% | 25 Jun → | |
| mirage | 7–13 | 0.05 | 41% | 24 Jun → | |
| dust2 | 13–3 | 0.14 | 15% | 24 Jun → | |
| nuke | 19–17 | 0.07 | 21% | 23 Jun → | |
| inferno | 13–3 | 0.20 | 32% | 23 Jun → | |
| dust2 | 9–13 | 0.03 | 23% | 23 Jun → | |
| ancient | 13–8 | 0.09 | 35% | 22 Jun → | |
| ancient | 13–5 | 0.08 | 13% | 21 Jun → | |
| dust2 | 13–7 | 0.07 | 18% | 20 Jun → | |
| ancient | 10–13 | 0.10 | 25% | 20 Jun → | |
| ancient | 16–14 | 0.09 | 19% | 19 Jun → | |
| dust2 | 9–13 | 0.10 | 20% | 17 Jun → | |
| ancient | 11–13 | 0.01 | 16% | 17 Jun → | |
| ancient | 16–12 | 0.11 | 28% | 17 Jun → | |
| mirage | 13–3 | 0.15 | 24% | 17 Jun → | |
| nuke | 8–1 | 0.12 | 20% | 17 Jun → | |
| nuke | 13–6 | 0.04 | 16% | 16 Jun → | |
| dust2 | 13–11 | 0.08 | 27% | 16 Jun → | |
| mirage | 13–7 | 0.15 | 21% | 14 Jun → | |
| ancient | 13–5 | 0.18 | 30% | 13 Jun → | |
| nuke | 4–13 | -0.06 | 29% | 13 Jun → | |
| inferno | 13–7 | 0.07 | 24% | 13 Jun → | |
| mirage | 9–13 | 0.06 | 35% | 13 Jun → | |
| mirage | 13–8 | 0.02 | 31% | 12 Jun → | |
| inferno | 13–10 | 0.04 | 25% | 12 Jun → | |
| mirage | 13–4 | 0.17 | 24% | 8 Jun → | |
| nuke | 13–5 | -0.02 | 31% | 8 Jun → | |
| dust2 | 9–13 | 0.12 | 28% | 7 Jun → | |
| cache | 13–4 | 0.12 | 29% | 7 Jun → | |
| office | 7–13 | 0.05 | 26% | 1 Jun → | |
| mirage | 13–10 | 0.19 | 35% | 1 Jun → | |
| anubis | 13–5 | 0.07 | 38% | 31 May → | |
| inferno | 13–2 | 0.10 | 35% | 31 May → | |
| mirage | 13–1 | 0.06 | 31% | 31 May → | |
| dust2 | 12–16 | 0.01 | 27% | 31 May → | |
| mirage | 15–15 | 0.06 | 41% | 31 May → | |
| nuke | 13–8 | 0.00 | 38% | 31 May → | |
| mirage | 7–0 | 0.06 | 26% | 31 May → | |
| anubis | 13–3 | 0.16 | 31% | 31 May → | |
| mirage | 10–13 | 0.02 | 23% | 30 May → | |
| mirage | 9–13 | -0.02 | 26% | 30 May → | |
| nuke | 13–3 | 0.13 | 19% | 30 May → | |
| dust2 | 12–12 | 0.12 | 48% | 28 May → | |
| mirage | 13–9 | 0.06 | 26% | 27 May → | |
| inferno | 8–13 | -0.01 | 31% | 27 May → |
Match data via Leetify.