....JAME$.... — CS2 Stats
US76561199834434760[U:1:1874169032]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=918), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 5 median | Level 6 median | vs Level 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 42.8% | 44.2% | 44.9% | 2.1% short |
| Shot accuracy | 0.0% | 11.2% | 11.8% | 11.8% short |
| Kill/death ratio | 1.08 | 1.04 | 1.04 | above |
| Match win rate | 45.2% | 45.3% | 45.3% | meets |
This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Player DNA
Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.
Limited utility dependence
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match
Plays most like ropz 87% playstyle similarity
Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.
Where you differ: lower aim profile.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
Reaction time. 606ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 45 | 53% | 1.09 | 16.6 |
| Dust2 | 31 | 48% | 0.93 | 14.9 |
| Inferno | 21 | 43% | 1.02 | 14.2 |
| Ancient | 19 | 42% | 0.87 | 14.4 |
| Anubis | 9 | 67% | 1.20 | 15.6 |
| Overpass | 5 | 60% | 0.95 | 14.6 |
| Nuke | 5 | 40% | 0.77 | 13.0 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Grenades & UtilityGrenade Lineups →
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4653 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 39.9225% — below the 40% mark we flag