Joe Burger

Joe Burger — CS2 Stats

FR76561199807208095[U:1:1846942367]Steam profile ↗

1,594Tracked matches41%Win rate2024Tracked since
635Hours in CS
CSDB Rating3.7 LearningPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating11,012Blue band · top ~49.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#20964 of 29405 tracked
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,240), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate43.3%41.7%44.1%meets
Shot accuracy0.0%8.8%11.4%11.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.850.971.030.18 short
Match win rate45.9%43.8%45.2%meets

This profile matches the typical Purple band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJoe BurgerPREMIER11,012 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning34
Utility9

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48466Last 10048%Win rateTLWWLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.1
Aggression2.5
Utility0.9
Positioning3.4
Opening Duels0.3
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 69% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 686ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning3.4
Utility0.9
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact2.1

Composite 3.7/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time670ms−9ms
first ⅓ avg 679ms → last ⅓ avg 670ms
Headshot accuracy15.2%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 16.0% → last ⅓ avg 15.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — ancient 13–4
130Biggest win — ancient
4Longest win streak
65In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 64% over 11infernoWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A25151060%-0.01
mirageB1991047%-0.01
nukeB136746%-0.05
anubisA117464%0.00
infernoD102820%-0.01
ancientA74357%0.00
cacheB63350%-0.02
overpass42250%0.00
debris1010%-0.06
eldorado1010%-0.12
poseidon1010%-0.10
train1010%0.00
vertigo1010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

23,592Lifetime kills
0.85K/D
1,815Matches
45.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Blue band
43.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Blue band
0.0%Shot accuracy
3,480MVPs
635Hours (in match)
2,059Bombs planted
278Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,145inferno
3,104nuke
1,839dust2
700train
61vertigo
10ar_shoots
3italy
3ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

3Matches
33%Win rate
0.91Avg K/D
68.0ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1100%1.3013.0
Nuke10%0.5910.0
Overpass10%0.8517.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.0%Headshot accuracy
37.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.2%Spray accuracy
77.8%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
686msReaction time
21.0%T opening success
41.3%CT opening success
0.14Enemies flashed / flash
1.7%Flash assists
6.48HE damage / grenade
0.54Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.1351 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.9732% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno8–8-0.049%1 Aug
dust28–13-0.0827%1 Aug
cache13–9-0.007%1 Aug
dust213–11-0.0115%1 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0716%28 Jul
ancient11–13-0.029%28 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0118%23 Jul
cache4–13-0.0422%23 Jul
dust213–100.0318%23 Jul
inferno8–13-0.014%23 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0711%22 Jul
dust26–13-0.0618%20 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0510%20 Jul
dust211–13-0.0230%18 Jul
dust213–10-0.0322%18 Jul
dust213–8-0.0528%18 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0314%18 Jul
mirage13–80.0512%17 Jul
dust26–130.0411%17 Jul
nuke8–13-0.107%17 Jul
cache2–13-0.105%17 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0321%17 Jul
dust29–13-0.0216%17 Jul
debris2–9-0.0610%17 Jul
eldorado4–9-0.1213%17 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0511%17 Jul
mirage13–70.0522%17 Jul
anubis13–40.0114%16 Jul
dust28–13-0.0519%16 Jul
cache0–13-0.020%16 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0422%16 Jul
dust213–8-0.0621%16 Jul
nuke13–80.0121%16 Jul
mirage9–130.0217%15 Jul
cache13–11-0.0212%15 Jul
dust213–9-0.0417%15 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0414%13 Jul
dust28–00.1232%13 Jul
inferno5–130.0414%12 Jul
dust213–8-0.0218%12 Jul
ancient13–4-0.0218%12 Jul
cache13–110.0712%9 Jul
anubis13–40.1112%8 Jul
anubis12–120.0214%7 Jul
poseidon3–9-0.1013%7 Jul
inferno9–60.0711%7 Jul
inferno2–13-0.0524%6 Jul
overpass13–110.0716%6 Jul
mirage13–100.0115%6 Jul
dust24–13-0.048%6 Jul
dust213–6-0.0116%5 Jul
inferno7–130.0714%5 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0211%5 Jul
dust213–60.0119%5 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0711%4 Jul
mirage3–13-0.069%3 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0318%3 Jul
train9–130.0023%3 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0524%3 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0113%3 Jul
dust213–80.0125%3 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0310%3 Jul
vertigo6–90.0211%3 Jul
inferno4–9-0.0616%3 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0721%2 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0216%2 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0415%2 Jul
overpass13–80.0016%1 Jul
dust29–130.0311%1 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0113%1 Jul
overpass12–120.0322%29 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0011%29 Jun
anubis13–60.0820%29 Jun
ancient13–40.1317%29 Jun
mirage13–70.0810%27 Jun
nuke2–8-0.0710%27 Jun
dust213–2-0.0719%27 Jun
inferno13–9-0.045%27 Jun
mirage6–130.0029%27 Jun
anubis13–80.0223%27 Jun
dust213–5-0.0317%26 Jun
nuke6–9-0.1213%25 Jun
nuke9–4-0.054%24 Jun
nuke8–8-0.1115%24 Jun
nuke13–60.0127%23 Jun
nuke13–100.0317%22 Jun
dust211–130.0010%22 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0213%21 Jun
overpass11–13-0.0918%6 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0315%29 May
dust24–13-0.0423%29 May
mirage15–15-0.0116%29 May
mirage6–130.0016%29 May
inferno3–13-0.0924%29 May
ancient13–00.0516%29 May
dust213–9-0.0315%28 May
dust213–80.0524%28 May
mirage13–1-0.014%28 May
mirage13–16-0.0318%28 May
anubis13–10-0.0819%26 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →