Mxqurrr — CS2 Stats

76561199795775082[U:1:1835509354]

1,627Tracked matches47%Win rate2025Tracked since
1,055Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.6 Developing
Premier CS Rating17,411Purple band · top ~18.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4587 of 7915 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,050 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

17,411Peak Premier on CSDB
1,050Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,050
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 1 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 17,411
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 2,589 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMxqurrrFACEITLevel 7 · 1,050 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER17,411 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,050csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning44
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48484Last 10048%Win rateLWLWLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.4
Aggression3.4
Utility6.3
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 42% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 623ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning4.4
Utility6.3
Mechanics4.2
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time627ms−29ms
first ⅓ avg 656ms → last ⅓ avg 627ms
Headshot accuracy17.7%+2.0%
first ⅓ avg 15.7% → last ⅓ avg 17.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — cache 13–8
130Biggest win — dust2
7Longest win streak
412In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 65% over 20anubisWeakest map · 11% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B24121250%0.02
mirageS2013765%-0.01
ancientC146843%-0.00
nukeB115645%0.00
infernoA116555%0.03
cacheC104640%0.03
anubisD91811%-0.01
vertigo110100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (11% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

37,644Lifetime kills
1.07K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
1,999Matches
46.3%Match win rate
48.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
0.0%Shot accuracy
4,018MVPs
1,055Hours (in match)
3,230Bombs planted
668Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4719,671
AWP1,563
MAC-101,088
MP9860
Knife384

Lifetime map wins

4,674dust2
2,741inferno
1,939nuke
291train
139vertigo
2ar_shoots
1ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

506Matches
49%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
74.7ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage14851%1.2916.3
Dust211252%1.2515.5
Inferno6245%1.1516.2
Ancient5555%1.0814.7
Nuke4540%1.0414.5
Cache3158%1.2216.4
Anubis2931%1.0513.0
Overpass1669%1.2619.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy
34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.8%Spray accuracy
68.7%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
623msReaction time
24.2%T opening success
42.4%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
10.32HE damage / grenade
26.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.2174% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

11% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient17–19-0.067%25 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0013%24 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0530%23 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0126%22 Aug
nuke5–130.0219%22 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0523%22 Aug
dust24–13-0.0214%22 Aug
inferno13–16-0.0216%22 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0023%21 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0517%21 Aug
dust212–16-0.0414%21 Aug
mirage13–70.0014%21 Aug
dust213–90.1029%21 Aug
mirage13–100.0712%20 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0116%20 Aug
cache6–130.0213%20 Aug
mirage16–130.0525%20 Aug
ancient13–90.0514%19 Aug
mirage13–100.0715%19 Aug
mirage6–13-0.095%19 Aug
dust213–70.006%18 Aug
dust213–8-0.0018%17 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0710%15 Aug
dust213–11-0.0113%15 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0336%14 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0111%14 Aug
mirage13–110.0129%13 Aug
inferno13–2-0.0313%13 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0212%13 Aug
inferno13–70.0721%13 Aug
inferno10–130.0321%13 Aug
dust213–20.1137%12 Aug
dust210–130.0319%12 Aug
anubis11–130.0717%12 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0511%12 Aug
inferno9–130.0534%11 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0216%11 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0321%11 Aug
dust26–13-0.0220%11 Aug
dust216–130.0123%10 Aug
dust213–90.0516%10 Aug
vertigo13–30.0912%9 Aug
nuke14–16-0.0425%9 Aug
ancient13–70.0616%9 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0232%9 Aug
cache13–3-0.0129%9 Aug
dust213–20.0836%8 Aug
mirage16–120.0421%8 Aug
cache13–80.1715%8 Aug
inferno13–60.1019%8 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0617%7 Aug
dust27–13-0.0110%6 Aug
nuke13–50.1439%6 Aug
dust211–130.0021%5 Aug
inferno9–130.0918%5 Aug
dust29–130.0022%5 Aug
dust213–30.1527%5 Aug
dust213–00.0216%5 Aug
anubis15–150.0116%5 Aug
ancient15–150.0211%4 Aug
nuke7–130.0018%4 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0622%4 Aug
ancient13–100.0120%4 Aug
nuke4–130.0218%3 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0419%3 Aug
mirage13–60.0619%3 Aug
cache7–130.0319%2 Aug
anubis7–13-0.006%2 Aug
ancient13–60.0011%2 Aug
dust213–6-0.0118%2 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0110%1 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0515%1 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0118%1 Aug
dust26–13-0.0716%1 Aug
dust213–90.0725%31 Jul
dust215–150.0126%31 Jul
dust24–130.0226%31 Jul
cache3–13-0.0510%31 Jul
mirage13–70.0217%31 Jul
ancient11–130.0114%31 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0215%31 Jul
cache13–90.0011%30 Jul
ancient13–80.0510%30 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0116%30 Jul
nuke11–130.0022%29 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0614%29 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0420%28 Jul
dust21–13-0.0025%28 Jul
cache11–130.0712%28 Jul
cache13–60.0116%26 Jul
inferno13–20.0815%26 Jul
cache11–130.0220%26 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0412%25 Jul
nuke13–100.029%25 Jul
dust29–13-0.0127%25 Jul
cache15–150.0111%25 Jul
mirage11–130.0117%25 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0610%25 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0215%25 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0013%24 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →