Napstr — CS2 Stats

76561199791814822[U:1:1831549094]

684Tracked matches46%Win rate2025Tracked since
804Hours in CS10Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.8 LearningClutch Specialist
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim44
Positioning33
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51427Last 10051%Win rateLLWWLWTLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion well above par.

Aim4.4
Aggression2.0
Utility5.1
Positioning3.3
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch10.0

Strong CT-side openerReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 73% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 35% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 685ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.4
Positioning3.3
Utility5.1
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels0.6
Win Impact3.8

Composite 3.8/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time686ms+7ms
first ⅓ avg 679ms → last ⅓ avg 686ms
Headshot accuracy16.8%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 15.0% → last ⅓ avg 16.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — dust2 13–5
132Biggest win — train
9Longest win streak
L2Current streak
83In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A26151158%-0.03
mirageB25121348%-0.02
ancientB158753%-0.00
cacheB147750%-0.02
anubisC52340%-0.01
infernoS54180%-0.02
train41325%-0.00
overpass31233%-0.01
nuke31233%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

9,034Lifetime kills
0.65K/D
853Matches
42.2%Match win rate
38.0%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
1,070MVPs
310Hours (in match)
948Bombs planted
163Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,190dust2
470train
414inferno
378nuke
114vertigo
12office
3ar_shoots
2ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

6Matches
50%Win rate
0.54Avg K/D
49.0ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

75%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2100%0.407.5
Ancient10%0.7814.0
Dust210%0.466.0
Overpass10%0.365.0
Anubis1100%0.8814.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy
29.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.8%Spray accuracy
82.2%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
685msReaction time
19.6%T opening success
35.0%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
7.1%Flash assists
9.52HE damage / grenade
9.25Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.64% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache2–13-0.046%27 Aug
dust210–13-0.0622%27 Aug
dust213–10-0.0825%27 Aug
cache9–00.0123%26 Aug
dust29–130.0026%25 Aug
mirage10–10.0743%25 Aug
anubis15–15-0.076%21 Aug
dust25–13-0.0417%19 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0512%19 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0422%18 Aug
dust213–40.0332%18 Aug
dust24–13-0.129%17 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0414%17 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0521%17 Aug
mirage12–12-0.1019%19 Jul
dust25–13-0.0519%10 Jul
mirage13–30.0117%9 Jul
dust213–90.039%9 Jul
anubis1–13-0.0715%28 Jun
dust213–6-0.0021%27 Jun
cache4–130.0117%27 Jun
inferno9–7-0.089%27 Jun
cache13–6-0.0027%27 Jun
ancient2–13-0.0323%20 Jun
mirage13–8-0.006%20 Jun
overpass4–13-0.0312%20 Jun
train7–130.0321%20 Jun
dust213–8-0.068%20 Jun
dust27–13-0.0730%20 Jun
anubis8–13-0.032%19 Jun
mirage13–6-0.049%19 Jun
cache7–13-0.025%19 Jun
dust23–13-0.1210%19 Jun
dust213–11-0.0113%19 Jun
dust216–120.0514%19 Jun
overpass13–60.058%19 Jun
mirage13–70.0420%19 Jun
cache13–70.0311%19 Jun
train13–2-0.0110%19 Jun
ancient13–6-0.027%19 Jun
anubis13–30.077%19 Jun
dust213–50.1317%18 Jun
cache7–13-0.096%18 Jun
nuke13–20.0412%18 Jun
dust24–13-0.0819%18 Jun
mirage13–110.0321%18 Jun
mirage13–90.0616%18 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0113%17 Jun
overpass6–13-0.0610%17 Jun
train6–13-0.0416%17 Jun
train12–120.0214%17 Jun
ancient13–20.0922%17 Jun
dust213–80.028%17 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0213%16 Jun
cache12–12-0.0216%16 Jun
mirage5–13-0.1014%16 Jun
cache11–13-0.0329%15 Jun
mirage6–13-0.090%15 Jun
mirage10–130.0116%14 Jun
mirage13–7-0.010%14 Jun
ancient5–00.0519%13 Jun
ancient11–130.028%13 Jun
dust213–8-0.0519%13 Jun
cache13–11-0.0312%13 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0512%11 Jun
dust213–11-0.0518%11 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0322%11 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0915%11 Jun
cache13–7-0.0120%11 Jun
nuke5–13-0.134%10 Jun
dust213–7-0.0518%10 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0413%10 Jun
dust25–13-0.086%10 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0623%10 Jun
mirage9–130.0811%10 Jun
dust25–13-0.0817%10 Jun
ancient13–60.1112%10 Jun
anubis13–60.0716%9 Jun
ancient13–90.0520%9 Jun
inferno13–90.0712%9 Jun
ancient16–140.0114%9 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0210%9 Jun
mirage5–13-0.096%9 Jun
mirage8–130.0125%9 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0625%9 Jun
inferno13–7-0.0111%8 Jun
nuke13–16-0.0317%8 Jun
mirage15–15-0.0715%8 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0311%7 Jun
ancient4–13-0.0613%7 Jun
cache13–6-0.0115%7 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0111%7 Jun
dust213–60.0224%6 Jun
cache12–12-0.0515%6 Jun
ancient13–7-0.049%6 Jun
dust213–100.0222%6 Jun
mirage12–12-0.0310%6 Jun
cache13–3-0.0714%6 Jun
dust213–60.0010%6 Jun
dust20–13-0.1229%6 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →