ANTIAIM? heavenly — CS2 Stats
76561199746540373[U:1:1786274645]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Red band among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,824), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Red band median |
|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 41.7% | 50.0% |
| Shot accuracy | 0.0% | 13.5% |
| Kill/death ratio | 1.28 | 1.13 |
| Match win rate | 64.7% | 48.4% |
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Entry Fragger — High opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.
Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match
Plays most like s1mple 92% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.
Where you differ: lower utility contribution.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Aim. Aim score of 97 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.
T openings. 66% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.
Areas to improve
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 8.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 93 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 nuke | B | 34 | 16–18 | 47% | -0.01 |
 mirage | A | 27 | 15–12 | 56% | 0.06 |
 vertigo | S | 12 | 10–2 | 83% | 0.10 |
| office | S | 8 | 6–2 | 75% | 0.08 |
 dust2 | — | 3 | 2–1 | 67% | 0.04 |
| agency | — | 3 | 1–2 | 33% | -0.01 |
 inferno | — | 2 | 1–1 | 50% | 0.03 |
 ancient | — | 2 | 1–1 | 50% | -0.00 |
 overpass | — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | 0.08 |
 cache | — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | -0.06 |
Across the last 93 tracked matches.
Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (47% over 34). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
47% win rate across 34 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| nuke | 9–2 | 0.06 | 32% | 29 Aug → | |
| vertigo | 9–0 | 0.06 | 40% | 29 Aug → | |
| overpass | 9–7 | 0.08 | 15% | 29 Aug → | |
| vertigo | 9–5 | 0.04 | 28% | 29 Aug → | |
| office | 13–2 | 0.13 | 35% | 29 Aug → | |
| office | 13–0 | 0.26 | 33% | 28 Aug → | |
| nuke | 8–8 | 0.09 | 29% | 28 Aug → | |
| nuke | 6–9 | 0.15 | 20% | 28 Aug → | |
| nuke | 9–4 | 0.23 | 21% | 28 Aug → | |
| mirage | 0–8 | 0.00 | 25% | 28 Aug → | |
| mirage | 4–13 | -0.00 | 56% | 28 Aug → | |
| mirage | 5–13 | 0.12 | 37% | 27 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–11 | 0.17 | 21% | 27 Aug → | |
| office | 10–13 | 0.07 | 29% | 27 Aug → | |
| mirage | 6–0 | 0.05 | 13% | 26 Aug → | |
| office | 13–7 | 0.10 | 40% | 26 Aug → | |
| office | 13–7 | 0.11 | 43% | 26 Aug → | |
| office | 3–13 | -0.11 | 50% | 25 Aug → | |
| office | 13–10 | -0.06 | 8% | 25 Aug → | |
| office | 13–9 | 0.17 | 37% | 24 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–4 | 0.02 | 38% | 24 Aug → | |
| vertigo | 8–8 | -0.03 | 43% | 24 Aug → | |
| nuke | 8–8 | -0.04 | 17% | 24 Aug → | |
| nuke | 7–9 | -0.03 | 19% | 23 Aug → | |
| nuke | 9–3 | 0.06 | 29% | 23 Aug → | |
| inferno | 4–9 | -0.15 | 38% | 23 Aug → | |
| nuke | 9–4 | 0.12 | 33% | 23 Aug → | |
| nuke | 8–8 | -0.04 | 33% | 23 Aug → | |
| vertigo | 9–2 | 0.09 | 50% | 23 Aug → | |
| vertigo | 9–1 | 0.31 | 35% | 23 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–11 | 0.04 | 38% | 23 Aug → | |
| mirage | 3–13 | 0.06 | 59% | 22 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–1 | 0.00 | 28% | 22 Aug → | |
| mirage | 5–2 | -0.00 | 22% | 22 Aug → | |
| nuke | 6–9 | 0.00 | 0% | 20 Aug → | |
| nuke | 9–5 | 0.10 | 25% | 19 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–3 | 0.14 | 27% | 19 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–6 | -0.02 | 35% | 19 Aug → | |
| ancient | 7–13 | -0.08 | 17% | 19 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–9 | 0.08 | 18% | 19 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–11 | 0.04 | 26% | 14 Aug → | |
| mirage | 15–15 | 0.15 | 28% | 14 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–5 | -0.07 | 32% | 14 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 7–13 | -0.07 | 28% | 14 Aug → | |
| ancient | 13–4 | 0.08 | 16% | 14 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–9 | 0.09 | 34% | 14 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–6 | 0.08 | 24% | 13 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–6 | -0.01 | 67% | 13 Aug → | |
| mirage | 3–10 | 0.00 | 18% | 12 Aug → | |
| inferno | 13–1 | 0.22 | 43% | 11 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–11 | -0.02 | 14% | 9 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–11 | 0.11 | 16% | 8 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–10 | 0.05 | 28% | 8 Aug → | |
| cache | 13–7 | -0.06 | 12% | 8 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–10 | 0.11 | 22% | 7 Aug → | |
| mirage | 8–13 | 0.09 | 19% | 6 Aug → | |
| mirage | 11–13 | 0.01 | 26% | 6 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–6 | 0.01 | 44% | 6 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–11 | 0.02 | 27% | 4 Aug → | |
| nuke | 7–9 | -0.05 | 19% | 3 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–10 | -0.06 | 23% | 3 Aug → | |
| vertigo | 9–1 | 0.12 | 36% | 2 Aug → | |
| mirage | 12–12 | 0.27 | 19% | 2 Aug → | |
| nuke | 4–9 | -0.10 | 17% | 1 Aug → | |
| nuke | 9–3 | 0.02 | 20% | 1 Aug → | |
| vertigo | 7–9 | -0.08 | 17% | 1 Aug → | |
| nuke | 5–9 | -0.19 | 7% | 1 Aug → | |
| vertigo | 9–1 | 0.13 | 15% | 31 Jul → | |
| nuke | 2–9 | -0.26 | 33% | 31 Jul → | |
| nuke | 6–9 | -0.12 | 6% | 30 Jul → | |
| nuke | 0–9 | -0.28 | 100% | 30 Jul → | |
| nuke | 0–9 | -0.20 | 100% | 30 Jul → | |
| nuke | 9–1 | 0.24 | 17% | 30 Jul → | |
| nuke | 9–2 | 0.16 | 10% | 30 Jul → | |
| nuke | 9–6 | 0.06 | 11% | 30 Jul → | |
| nuke | 0–9 | -0.19 | 43% | 29 Jul → | |
| nuke | 9–5 | 0.10 | 26% | 28 Jul → | |
| mirage | 12–12 | 0.23 | 18% | 26 Jul → | |
| mirage | 8–13 | 0.12 | 22% | 26 Jul → | |
| vertigo | 9–3 | 0.19 | 27% | 11 Feb → | |
| vertigo | 9–4 | 0.15 | 38% | 21 Jan → | |
| nuke | 6–9 | -0.04 | 26% | 21 Jan → | |
| nuke | 3–9 | -0.09 | 11% | 9 Jan → | |
| vertigo | 9–3 | 0.06 | 15% | 5 Jan → | |
| vertigo | 9–2 | 0.17 | 26% | 5 Jan → | |
| nuke | 8–8 | -0.09 | 9% | 4 Jan → | |
| mirage | 3–13 | -0.04 | 23% | 20 Dec → | |
| nuke | 9–3 | -0.05 | 26% | 19 Aug → | |
| nuke | 5–9 | -0.12 | 22% | 19 Aug → | |
| agency | 3–13 | -0.08 | 36% | 12 May → | |
| agency | 13–5 | 0.02 | 32% | 11 May → | |
| mirage | 13–5 | 0.13 | 24% | 10 May → | |
| agency | 6–13 | 0.05 | 32% | 9 May → |
Match data via Leetify.
