Croviks — CS2 Stats

76561199744621346[U:1:1784355618]

436Tracked matches47%Win rate2024Tracked since
201Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating12,016Blue band · top ~44.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#23282 of 33498 tracked
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver Elite Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=607), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate41.9%42.1%42.5%meets
Shot accuracy0.0%12.1%10.9%10.9% short
Kill/death ratio1.010.990.99meets
Match win rate44.9%43.9%44.2%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCroviksFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER12,016 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning53
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53461Last 10053%Win rateLWWWWWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.0
Aggression7.3
Utility4.4
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 626ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.3
Utility4.4
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time627ms+79ms
first ⅓ avg 548ms → last ⅓ avg 627ms
Headshot accuracy20.1%−6.3%
first ⅓ avg 26.4% → last ⅓ avg 20.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — inferno 13–5
130Biggest win — inferno
5Longest win streak
99In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 65% over 26nukeWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB29141548%0.00
dust2S2617965%0.00
infernoA22121055%-0.01
ancientA74357%-0.01
nukeD62433%-0.00
cacheC52340%0.04
anubis41325%-0.02
vertigo110100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

9,633Lifetime kills
1.01K/D · Top 50% of Level 3 players
566Matches
44.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 3 players
41.9%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
1,335MVPs
201Hours (in match)
506Bombs planted
84Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,424dust2
1,136inferno
341nuke
117vertigo
20train
17office
2ar_shoots
2ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

352Matches
47%Win rate
0.88Avg K/D
70.5ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust28548%0.8814.1
Mirage7838%0.8413.5
Inferno6746%0.8813.4
Anubis3145%0.7912.1
Nuke2938%0.9514.5
Ancient2955%0.8113.0
Cache2665%0.9615.3
Train333%0.8311.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy
37.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.6%Spray accuracy
80.1%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
626msReaction time
38.3%T opening success
46.8%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
4.0%Flash assists
6.46HE damage / grenade
12.46Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.2832% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno1–13-0.058%7 Aug
nuke13–100.0021%6 Aug
vertigo13–60.0215%5 Aug
mirage13–100.0516%5 Aug
anubis13–80.0018%5 Aug
mirage13–100.0614%4 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0018%1 Aug
dust212–16-0.0216%1 Aug
inferno13–2-0.0050%28 Jul
cache5–130.1226%27 Jul
inferno13–00.038%27 Jul
cache11–130.1329%27 Jul
dust213–50.0340%27 Jul
inferno13–100.0233%27 Jul
mirage16–130.0721%27 Jul
dust211–13-0.0110%26 Jul
ancient13–1-0.0715%26 Jul
mirage10–130.0233%26 Jul
inferno9–1-0.0913%26 Jul
dust28–13-0.100%25 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0314%23 Jul
ancient6–130.0938%23 Jul
mirage12–160.0529%23 Jul
dust213–7-0.0313%23 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0519%22 Jul
dust213–70.0110%22 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0024%21 Jul
mirage5–130.0431%21 Jul
inferno14–16-0.0221%20 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0518%20 Jul
dust211–130.028%20 Jul
dust23–13-0.0713%20 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0419%19 Jul
inferno5–13-0.1219%19 Jul
ancient13–10.027%18 Jul
nuke5–13-0.048%18 Jul
dust213–10-0.048%16 Jul
cache8–1-0.0527%15 Jul
cache13–60.0218%15 Jul
inferno13–80.0115%14 Jul
dust24–13-0.0516%14 Jul
inferno7–13-0.029%13 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0917%12 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0111%12 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0316%11 Jul
dust213–110.0814%11 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0120%10 Jul
mirage13–110.009%10 Jul
dust213–20.0136%9 Jul
mirage13–70.0415%9 Jul
dust22–13-0.108%9 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0121%8 Jul
nuke6–130.0432%8 Jul
dust219–170.0529%7 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0225%7 Jul
cache9–130.0013%7 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0411%6 Jul
dust26–13-0.0216%5 Jul
mirage13–110.0224%5 Jul
inferno13–6-0.1012%5 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0618%2 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0318%2 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0817%29 Jun
mirage13–50.0518%29 Jun
anubis7–13-0.007%29 Jun
dust213–10-0.066%28 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0222%27 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0910%26 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0310%24 Jun
nuke7–130.0133%23 Jun
dust213–110.0421%23 Jun
dust213–40.0238%23 Jun
dust213–50.1035%23 Jun
dust212–30.0340%23 Jun
mirage13–160.0233%22 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0510%22 Jun
mirage13–4-0.0146%21 Jun
inferno13–50.1521%19 Jun
dust213–20.1235%19 Jun
mirage2–130.0131%19 Jun
inferno13–16-0.0114%16 Jun
inferno13–5-0.0015%16 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0333%24 Feb
dust213–11-0.0338%22 Feb
mirage13–10.0657%20 Feb
dust213–10.1432%20 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0124%20 Feb
inferno11–130.0032%20 Feb
ancient13–40.0721%20 Feb
dust213–40.0224%16 Feb
inferno12–120.1227%16 Feb
mirage13–90.0619%16 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0618%9 Feb
inferno7–13-0.0311%9 Feb
inferno8–130.0346%25 Jan
dust28–13-0.088%24 Jan
mirage13–7-0.0023%20 Jan
dust213–9-0.0526%18 Jan
inferno8–3-0.0622%18 Jan
ancient6–13-0.0919%17 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →