David Martinez — CS2 Stats

76561199635049614[U:1:1674783886]

488Tracked matches60%Win rate2024Tracked since
1,166Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,892), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate46.0%48.5%51.9%5.9% short
Shot accuracy1.4%13.3%13.7%12.3% short
Kill/death ratio1.341.071.08above
Match win rate51.4%47.0%48.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDavid MartinezFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning59
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY63361Last 10063%Win rateLLWLWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.8
Aggression5.5
Utility5.0
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning5.9
Utility5.0
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time551ms+17ms
first ⅓ avg 535ms → last ⅓ avg 551ms
Headshot accuracy16.7%+1.2%
first ⅓ avg 15.5% → last ⅓ avg 16.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — dust2 6–13
131Biggest win — inferno
8Longest win streak
L2Current streak
99In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 74% over 23nukeWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2719870%0.02
dust2S2317674%0.04
ancientS128467%0.02
anubisA117464%0.01
infernoB105550%0.03
cacheB84450%0.01
nukeC83538%0.01
overpass1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

38,567Lifetime kills
1.34K/D · Top 25% of Level 9 players
1,780Matches
51.4%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 9 players
46.0%Headshot %
1.4%Shot accuracy
5,126MVPs
1,166Hours (in match)
1,587Bombs planted
708Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,642dust2
1,763inferno
1,580nuke
1,076vertigo
440train
72office
22italy
17ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

253Matches
55%Win rate
1.20Avg K/D
88.0ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6261%1.1817.8
Dust23868%1.3918.0
Ancient3462%1.0817.8
Inferno3441%1.1517.4
Nuke2938%1.1219.3
Anubis2654%1.2717.4
Vertigo1560%1.3017.7
Cache1040%1.1213.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
36.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.2%Spray accuracy
80.6%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
544msReaction time
34.3%T opening success
51.2%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
8.48HE damage / grenade
5.88Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4721 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.3253% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage9–130.0612%30 Jul
dust210–130.0524%30 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0111%29 Jul
cache11–13-0.0116%29 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0719%29 Jul
mirage13–7-0.066%24 Jul
dust213–50.0415%24 Jul
cache9–13-0.039%18 Jul
ancient10–130.0114%18 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0423%18 Jul
mirage16–130.0018%18 Jul
dust213–80.0111%18 Jul
dust213–100.0314%17 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0122%17 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0315%17 Jul
inferno13–20.1031%15 Jul
inferno13–16-0.0221%15 Jul
mirage8–13-0.038%14 Jul
mirage16–140.0118%14 Jul
dust213–100.0616%13 Jul
mirage13–40.0127%13 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0114%13 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0317%13 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0114%12 Jul
dust213–100.0615%11 Jul
dust213–70.1121%11 Jul
dust213–90.0913%11 Jul
anubis8–130.0211%11 Jul
mirage13–110.0218%11 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0324%10 Jul
mirage10–130.0217%10 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0323%10 Jul
cache8–13-0.0314%10 Jul
inferno13–10.0811%10 Jul
cache13–50.1322%9 Jul
mirage12–120.1114%9 Jul
anubis13–90.0015%8 Jul
nuke13–16-0.0612%8 Jul
dust213–3-0.0713%8 Jul
dust213–100.0264%8 Jul
ancient16–12-0.029%8 Jul
nuke14–16-0.0114%8 Jul
ancient13–100.0510%8 Jul
dust23–130.0120%8 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0219%8 Jul
ancient13–60.096%8 Jul
anubis13–60.0316%7 Jul
dust213–50.0122%7 Jul
mirage22–180.0113%7 Jul
dust25–13-0.018%7 Jul
dust26–130.1424%7 Jul
nuke7–13-0.038%7 Jul
inferno13–110.0213%6 Jul
mirage13–60.0519%6 Jul
anubis10–130.0114%6 Jul
dust213–50.0922%6 Jul
cache13–10.0712%6 Jul
mirage22–20-0.0615%6 Jul
anubis13–90.066%5 Jul
ancient13–50.0614%5 Jul
dust213–50.0623%5 Jul
anubis13–110.1217%5 Jul
inferno13–70.014%4 Jul
inferno11–130.0222%4 Jul
ancient13–16-0.039%4 Jul
overpass6–130.0128%4 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0113%4 Jul
mirage13–40.1130%4 Jul
anubis13–80.0412%4 Jul
ancient11–130.048%4 Jul
dust213–60.0719%4 Jul
mirage10–130.0612%2 Jul
mirage4–130.0722%2 Jul
nuke13–10.0728%2 Jul
dust213–6-0.0114%2 Jul
nuke17–190.068%2 Jul
ancient13–80.0511%2 Jul
ancient19–160.0312%29 Jun
mirage13–90.0211%28 Jun
ancient13–110.056%28 Jun
dust213–50.0816%28 Jun
mirage17–190.1313%24 Jun
mirage13–40.0115%23 Jun
mirage9–13-0.079%23 Jun
inferno11–130.0620%23 Jun
dust213–40.0910%23 Jun
inferno13–20.1122%21 Jun
dust28–130.0313%21 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0519%21 Jun
cache13–2-0.0017%21 Jun
nuke13–70.0312%19 Jun
mirage13–110.0118%19 Jun
cache2–12-0.0422%19 Jun
dust213–90.0920%17 Jun
dust24–13-0.0010%17 Jun
mirage19–150.0313%17 Jun
mirage13–50.1324%17 Jun
nuke16–130.0522%17 Jun
cache13–80.037%17 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0317%17 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →