yin — CS2 Stats

76561199629663571[U:1:1669397843]✓ No bans

70Tracked matches73%Win rate2025Tracked since
39Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating17,983Purple band · top ~16.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#11813 of 22235 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,789), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate60.3%44.1%47.2%above
Shot accuracy0.0%11.4%12.7%12.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.831.031.090.26 short
Match win rate34.3%45.2%46.6%12.3% short

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGyinPREMIER17,983 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91
Positioning35
Utility22

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT50191Last 7071%Win rateWLWLWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim9.1
Aggression3.8
Utility2.2
Positioning3.5
Opening Duels0.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 56 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 604ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1
Positioning3.5
Utility2.2
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels0.1
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time578ms+54ms
first ⅓ avg 524ms → last ⅓ avg 578ms
Headshot accuracy29.6%+5.4%
first ⅓ avg 24.2% → last ⅓ avg 29.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 70 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — dust2 13–5
130Biggest win — dust2
9Longest win streak
60In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 83% over 18infernoWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S2519676%0.00
mirageS1815383%0.02
nukeA95456%-0.03
ancientS64267%0.02
overpassS54180%0.01
infernoC52340%0.01
anubis1010%-0.01
train110100%0.04

Across the last 70 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

3,138Lifetime kills
0.83K/D
175Matches
34.3%Match win rate
60.3%Headshot % · Top 10% of Purple band
0.0%Shot accuracy
146MVPs
39Hours (in match)
72Bombs planted
32Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

261dust2
92nuke
51inferno
19office
13train
12italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.2%Headshot accuracy
38.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.2%Spray accuracy
85.7%Counter-strafing
7.0°Preaim
604msReaction time
31.1%T opening success
22.0%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
12.39HE damage / grenade
10.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.0625% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–50.1023%2 Apr
nuke5–13-0.057%25 Mar
mirage13–7-0.084%22 Mar
dust26–130.0313%22 Mar
mirage13–30.0419%21 Mar
ancient13–70.0813%20 Mar
anubis0–9-0.0150%20 Mar
mirage13–30.0932%1 Sept
dust213–0-0.0340%10 Aug
overpass13–0-0.0060%10 Aug
dust25–13-0.1036%10 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0514%10 Aug
dust20–7-0.0425%10 Aug
mirage13–10.1227%10 Aug
dust22–7-0.090%28 Jul
dust213–1-0.0128%28 Jul
ancient13–00.0433%28 Jul
dust213–10.0045%28 Jul
mirage2–00.01100%28 Jul
dust213–4-0.0414%27 Jul
dust213–0-0.0131%27 Jul
dust213–1-0.0527%27 Jul
train13–20.0439%27 Jul
dust213–8-0.0130%27 Jul
dust24–13-0.04100%26 Jul
dust213–20.0220%26 Jul
nuke13–1-0.0024%26 Jul
dust213–3-0.080%26 Jul
dust25–1-0.0418%26 Jul
mirage13–40.0119%26 Jul
mirage1–6-0.07100%26 Jul
ancient1–13-0.0733%26 Jul
inferno3–00.080%24 Jul
overpass13–2-0.0411%23 Jul
inferno1–13-0.0322%23 Jul
nuke3–1-0.06100%23 Jul
dust24–130.0241%22 Jul
dust22–00.110%22 Jul
mirage13–30.0636%22 Jul
overpass13–70.0719%22 Jul
mirage13–00.0129%22 Jul
nuke2–00.000%22 Jul
ancient2–13-0.1020%22 Jul
dust211–0-0.0650%22 Jul
dust213–50.2219%21 Jul
nuke13–50.0547%21 Jul
mirage1–13-0.09100%20 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0220%20 Jul
inferno15–15-0.084%20 Jul
nuke5–13-0.070%20 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0250%20 Jul
nuke1–4-0.050%20 Jul
dust213–10-0.0223%20 Jul
overpass10–00.0317%20 Jul
dust213–10-0.0319%19 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0353%19 Jul
ancient13–30.1733%19 Jul
dust213–110.0328%19 Jul
mirage13–40.1129%19 Jul
ancient13–110.007%19 Jul
mirage13–00.0823%19 Jul
inferno1–13-0.0039%19 Jul
mirage13–50.1426%19 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0713%19 Jul
mirage13–80.0426%19 Jul
overpass4–120.0219%16 Jul
dust213–90.0326%14 Jul
inferno13–20.0739%14 Jul
mirage11–2-0.0437%13 Jul
dust213–20.1525%13 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Aim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →