Alfredo 2 — CS2 Stats

76561199563124171[U:1:1602858443]

1,380Tracked matches37%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,115Hours in CS8Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingAggressive Rifler
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning60
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44488Last 10044%Win rateLLWLLLTWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.0
Aggression9.4
Utility4.9
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch6.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 605ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning6.0
Utility4.9
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact0.7

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time601ms+17ms
first ⅓ avg 584ms → last ⅓ avg 601ms
Headshot accuracy31.9%+8.3%
first ⅓ avg 23.5% → last ⅓ avg 31.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — dust2 12–12
130Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
45In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 67% over 6anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB28131546%0.02
dust2D1551033%0.04
infernoC94544%0.03
trainA95456%0.04
officeC73443%-0.01
mirageS64267%0.05
poseidonB63350%0.03
anubisD51420%0.03
nuke43175%0.08
boulder41325%0.04
vertigo2020%0.03
ancient2020%-0.02
shelter110100%-0.02
fachwerk1010%-0.02
overpass110100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

37,433Lifetime kills
1.16K/D · Top 25% of tracked players
1,476Matches
48.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of tracked players
66.0%Headshot % · Top 5% of tracked players
0.2%Shot accuracy
3,885MVPs
1,219Hours (in match)
1,448Bombs planted
570Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4719,873
AWP3,186
P90308
Knife290

Lifetime map wins

3,160dust2
1,232inferno
1,013nuke
627office
596vertigo
524train
157italy
3ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

36Matches
58%Win rate
1.30Avg K/D
84.0ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21118%0.9914.6
Ancient650%1.2815.5
Anubis6100%1.2416.3
Mirage4100%1.3619.0
Inferno4100%1.5822.3
Nuke30%1.1026.7
Cache1100%1.2222.0
Train1100%4.509.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

31.6%Headshot accuracy
34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.7%Spray accuracy
79.0%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
605msReaction time
35.7%T opening success
58.2%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
7.1%Flash assists
10.63HE damage / grenade
6.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.6739% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust29–13-0.0129%26 Aug
inferno6–130.0426%25 Aug
nuke13–60.1130%25 Aug
inferno3–130.0036%25 Aug
inferno5–130.0329%24 Aug
mirage11–130.0628%23 Aug
mirage12–120.0632%17 Aug
inferno13–100.0327%17 Aug
boulder13–60.0821%17 Aug
train13–90.1052%16 Aug
dust210–130.0452%16 Aug
poseidon6–90.0645%16 Aug
dust212–120.0334%13 Aug
inferno7–130.0529%13 Aug
train13–10.0731%12 Aug
vertigo5–130.0154%12 Aug
train7–13-0.0324%12 Aug
train0–8-0.0455%12 Aug
nuke13–40.1322%10 Aug
dust211–130.1240%10 Aug
dust213–60.1019%10 Aug
dust29–50.1229%10 Aug
anubis10–130.0125%26 Jul
anubis8–130.0150%23 Jul
dust212–120.1630%20 Jul
boulder5–13-0.0029%14 Jul
boulder4–130.0717%13 Jul
shelter13–10-0.0215%13 Jul
boulder4–13-0.0127%12 Jul
fachwerk10–13-0.0232%12 Jul
dust213–00.1226%9 Jul
dust24–13-0.0321%9 Jul
office13–70.0033%8 Jul
office12–120.1042%8 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0225%7 Jul
mirage13–50.0428%7 Jul
train13–80.1143%7 Jul
cache13–10-0.0125%6 Jul
mirage13–70.0418%5 Jul
overpass13–100.0932%4 Jul
cache8–13-0.0227%1 Jul
mirage13–90.0319%30 Jun
dust24–13-0.0633%30 Jun
poseidon9–60.0619%30 Jun
inferno12–120.0134%29 Jun
inferno13–90.0327%29 Jun
mirage13–60.0620%29 Jun
cache6–13-0.0525%29 Jun
poseidon8–8-0.0229%29 Jun
poseidon6–90.0229%29 Jun
dust29–13-0.0215%27 Jun
inferno13–20.0829%25 Jun
cache11–13-0.0017%25 Jun
cache5–130.0521%24 Jun
cache13–50.0428%22 Jun
cache12–120.0418%18 Jun
train1–13-0.1017%18 Jun
train2–00.1429%18 Jun
train13–70.1025%18 Jun
train10–130.0129%17 Jun
dust213–90.0732%16 Jun
nuke13–90.0926%15 Jun
poseidon9–4-0.0118%13 Jun
cache13–90.1240%11 Jun
cache13–10.0750%10 Jun
vertigo6–130.0520%8 Jun
inferno13–70.0229%8 Jun
cache11–130.0123%1 Jun
cache8–130.0327%1 Jun
anubis5–130.0028%31 May
anubis13–30.1021%29 May
anubis6–130.0313%29 May
cache13–7-0.0117%26 May
cache13–70.0013%25 May
cache13–70.0329%25 May
cache13–50.0217%24 May
ancient6–13-0.0132%24 May
dust28–130.0019%24 May
cache0–8-0.0513%24 May
cache13–50.1138%24 May
cache3–10.1221%21 May
cache12–12-0.0636%20 May
cache13–110.0727%19 May
poseidon9–70.0525%18 May
office13–10-0.0824%18 May
office4–13-0.0218%18 May
office11–130.0322%14 May
office5–13-0.1129%13 May
ancient8–13-0.0325%13 May
office13–6-0.0241%13 May
cache10–130.0235%13 May
cache8–130.0211%12 May
cache13–100.0612%12 May
dust25–13-0.0630%12 May
dust213–60.0316%12 May
cache1–130.0119%12 May
cache9–13-0.0220%12 May
cache13–5-0.0321%11 May
cache7–130.0425%11 May
cache9–13-0.0731%11 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →