Huligani.OTMOROZOK

Huligani.OTMOROZOK — CS2 Stats

NL76561199558038179[U:1:1597772451]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

175Tracked matches55%Win rate2023Tracked since
213Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.7 Developing
Premier CS Rating17,261Purple band · top ~19.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#23990 of 45952 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=5,002), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate38.5%44.2%47.1%8.5% short
Shot accuracy0.0%11.6%12.8%12.8% short
Kill/death ratio0.771.031.080.31 short
Match win rate41.1%45.2%46.6%5.5% short

This profile sits below the typical Pink band player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHuligani.OTMOROZOKPREMIER17,261 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim50
Positioning41
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53443Last 10053%Win rateWWWLLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.0
Aggression2.6
Utility4.6
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 72% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 39% on CT to 18% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 621ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.0
Positioning4.1
Utility4.6
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact6.7

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time621ms−50ms
first ⅓ avg 672ms → last ⅓ avg 621ms
Headshot accuracy11.7%−1.1%
first ⅓ avg 12.7% → last ⅓ avg 11.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — anubis 13–4
131Biggest win — ancient
6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
159In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 100% over 5mirageWeakest map · 38% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B28131546%-0.00
mirageC2181338%-0.03
ancientA1911858%-0.01
anubisA116555%-0.00
cacheA85363%-0.04
nukeS64267%-0.01
infernoS550100%0.00
train1010%-0.07
overpass110100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

8,483Lifetime kills
0.77K/D
613Matches
41.1%Match win rate
38.5%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
787MVPs
213Hours (in match)
633Bombs planted
94Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,519dust2
262nuke
164inferno
132train
53office
45vertigo
4ar_shoots
2ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

10.8%Headshot accuracy
31.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.1%Spray accuracy
78.5%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
621msReaction time
18.2%T opening success
39.5%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
5.92HE damage / grenade
11.49Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 10.8123% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 18.2381% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–11-0.0214%30 Aug
cache13–100.0311%28 Aug
mirage13–80.017%28 Aug
ancient7–13-0.057%21 Aug
dust22–60.0415%19 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0616%16 Aug
train8–13-0.075%15 Aug
inferno13–110.0211%7 Aug
inferno13–100.0212%7 Aug
cache13–11-0.0710%6 Aug
dust216–13-0.0510%31 Jul
dust29–13-0.0310%30 Jul
dust213–7-0.006%29 Jul
mirage5–13-0.103%23 Jul
ancient13–10.0230%16 Jul
mirage12–120.0115%16 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0316%10 Jul
inferno13–11-0.029%8 Jul
ancient11–13-0.046%8 Jul
cache13–110.0112%1 Jul
inferno13–80.0310%24 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0113%17 Jun
dust29–13-0.0113%17 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0814%17 Jun
dust213–110.0014%17 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0013%11 Jun
dust213–10-0.025%11 Jun
dust29–13-0.0111%3 Jun
dust213–70.049%3 Jun
anubis11–13-0.007%27 May
mirage13–11-0.0120%23 May
dust213–7-0.0020%20 May
anubis13–40.1513%20 May
ancient5–13-0.0210%20 May
overpass13–60.0621%13 May
cache9–13-0.077%4 May
cache13–10-0.0413%30 Apr
cache9–13-0.1017%29 Apr
cache13–6-0.0221%29 Apr
cache10–13-0.0210%29 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0116%27 Apr
dust26–13-0.0114%27 Apr
dust213–30.0520%22 Apr
anubis13–8-0.0316%7 Apr
dust213–50.019%3 Apr
anubis13–70.0619%1 Apr
dust27–130.0213%31 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0317%31 Mar
dust213–6-0.0216%27 Mar
nuke13–11-0.017%25 Mar
dust29–13-0.0619%25 Mar
dust215–150.0310%19 Mar
dust211–13-0.0215%18 Mar
anubis9–1-0.0117%18 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0416%17 Mar
anubis13–7-0.028%17 Mar
anubis7–13-0.0412%10 Mar
mirage13–4-0.0311%8 Mar
ancient13–1-0.068%4 Mar
ancient13–5-0.0118%4 Mar
anubis13–70.0312%3 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0618%2 Mar
dust210–130.028%2 Mar
anubis8–13-0.0615%28 Feb
dust213–5-0.0216%28 Feb
dust213–30.0212%27 Feb
nuke8–13-0.0016%27 Feb
dust22–13-0.019%27 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0313%26 Feb
ancient16–130.0113%26 Feb
dust213–30.0312%26 Feb
anubis7–13-0.088%25 Feb
ancient13–11-0.089%23 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0323%19 Feb
nuke16–140.0119%19 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0411%18 Feb
ancient13–60.017%13 Feb
nuke16–140.0216%12 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0115%11 Feb
ancient13–80.0015%6 Feb
ancient1–13-0.0610%5 Feb
mirage13–100.018%4 Feb
dust213–80.0712%4 Feb
ancient13–110.0210%4 Feb
ancient13–90.0212%2 Feb
inferno13–10-0.035%30 Jan
ancient16–14-0.038%29 Jan
mirage14–16-0.049%28 Jan
dust25–130.018%28 Jan
dust215–15-0.1019%28 Jan
ancient11–13-0.0311%27 Jan
mirage5–13-0.0338%26 Jan
dust210–13-0.0210%25 Jan
mirage13–50.0414%25 Jan
dust211–13-0.029%24 Jan
ancient7–130.0213%24 Jan
mirage4–13-0.0310%23 Jan
ancient13–50.0412%21 Jan
mirage13–11-0.0622%15 Jan
anubis4–13-0.0213%10 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →