ego — CS2 Stats
BR76561199501490288[U:1:1541224560]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,022), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 7 median | Level 8 median | vs Level 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 62.2% | 46.2% | 47.2% | above |
| Shot accuracy | 0.4% | 12.5% | 12.3% | 11.9% short |
| Kill/death ratio | 1.36 | 1.06 | 1.07 | above |
| Match win rate | 45.8% | 45.9% | 46.3% | meets |
This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.
Strong CT-side opener
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match
Plays most like donk 91% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.
Where you differ: lower aim profile.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Reaction time. 559ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 49 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 dust2 | B | 13 | 7–6 | 54% | 0.03 |
 mirage | D | 12 | 4–8 | 33% | 0.01 |
 anubis | S | 6 | 5–1 | 83% | 0.06 |
 inferno | B | 6 | 3–3 | 50% | 0.01 |
 nuke | C | 5 | 2–3 | 40% | -0.02 |
 ancient | — | 3 | 2–1 | 67% | 0.02 |
 overpass | — | 2 | 1–1 | 50% | 0.10 |
 train | — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | -0.01 |
 vertigo | — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | -0.09 |
Across the last 49 tracked matches.
Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dust2 | 213 | 51% | 1.19 | 17.2 |
| Mirage | 177 | 43% | 1.16 | 17.3 |
| Anubis | 130 | 61% | 1.30 | 18.6 |
| Ancient | 54 | 48% | 1.21 | 18.5 |
| Nuke | 34 | 44% | 1.13 | 17.6 |
| Inferno | 30 | 37% | 1.09 | 18.0 |
| Overpass | 12 | 25% | 1.05 | 18.2 |
| Cache | 7 | 14% | 0.83 | 15.1 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 36.1491% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dust2 | 13–6 | 0.04 | 23% | 15 Aug → | |
| ancient | 13–6 | 0.02 | 19% | 13 Aug → | |
| anubis | 13–10 | -0.03 | 19% | 7 Aug → | |
| mirage | 10–13 | -0.03 | 26% | 2 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–8 | 0.02 | 14% | 31 Jul → | |
| inferno | 16–13 | -0.01 | 22% | 24 Jul → | |
| anubis | 13–5 | 0.05 | 16% | 17 Jul → | |
| mirage | 10–13 | 0.03 | 21% | 14 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–3 | 0.02 | 23% | 9 Jul → | |
| overpass | 9–1 | 0.27 | 31% | 8 Jul → | |
| inferno | 3–9 | -0.09 | 17% | 8 Jul → | |
| nuke | 1–9 | -0.16 | 0% | 8 Jul → | |
| ancient | 16–19 | 0.02 | 32% | 3 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 1–9 | -0.00 | 50% | 1 Jul → | |
| nuke | 8–13 | 0.10 | 20% | 29 Jun → | |
| dust2 | 13–10 | 0.04 | 16% | 26 Jun → | |
| mirage | 13–9 | -0.01 | 21% | 26 Jun → | |
| mirage | 10–13 | 0.10 | 17% | 22 Jun → | |
| overpass | 7–13 | -0.07 | 13% | 21 Jun → | |
| anubis | 13–4 | 0.04 | 26% | 21 Jun → | |
| anubis | 13–10 | 0.13 | 23% | 20 Jun → | |
| dust2 | 8–13 | -0.05 | 25% | 7 Jun → | |
| dust2 | 6–13 | -0.08 | 17% | 7 Jun → | |
| nuke | 12–16 | -0.04 | 17% | 2 Jun → | |
| mirage | 8–13 | -0.04 | 8% | 25 May → | |
| inferno | 7–13 | 0.02 | 16% | 20 May → | |
| dust2 | 4–13 | -0.02 | 13% | 19 May → | |
| ancient | 13–9 | 0.01 | 8% | 19 May → | |
| dust2 | 13–2 | 0.04 | 18% | 17 May → | |
| dust2 | 13–3 | 0.13 | 33% | 17 May → | |
| inferno | 4–13 | -0.06 | 23% | 16 May → | |
| dust2 | 17–19 | 0.01 | 24% | 13 May → | |
| mirage | 10–13 | 0.03 | 18% | 12 May → | |
| mirage | 13–10 | 0.01 | 9% | 26 Apr → | |
| dust2 | 13–3 | 0.09 | 20% | 23 Apr → | |
| mirage | 3–13 | -0.01 | 17% | 18 Apr → | |
| inferno | 5–0 | 0.10 | 75% | 15 Apr → | |
| dust2 | 13–11 | -0.03 | 37% | 3 Jan → | |
| inferno | 13–10 | 0.10 | 33% | 7 Nov → | |
| dust2 | 13–3 | 0.18 | 19% | 5 Nov → | |
| nuke | 13–11 | -0.00 | 31% | 31 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–11 | -0.00 | 31% | 31 Aug → | |
| train | 15–15 | -0.01 | 25% | 11 Jul → | |
| mirage | 10–13 | 0.03 | 31% | 18 May → | |
| anubis | 16–13 | 0.10 | 13% | 14 May → | |
| anubis | 11–13 | 0.09 | 26% | 10 May → | |
| dust2 | 6–13 | -0.02 | 16% | 8 May → | |
| mirage | 2–13 | -0.04 | 30% | 7 Jun → | |
| vertigo | 7–9 | -0.09 | 23% | 21 May → |
Match data via Leetify.