zaol — CS2 Stats
76561199498716321[U:1:1538450593]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,966), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 8 median | Level 9 median | vs Level 9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 58.9% | 47.0% | 48.5% | above |
| Shot accuracy | 0.6% | 12.7% | 13.3% | 12.7% short |
| Kill/death ratio | 1.19 | 1.07 | 1.07 | above |
| Match win rate | 53.7% | 46.4% | 47.0% | above |
This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.
Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match
Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.
Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 42% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Reaction time. 635ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 mirage | S | 21 | 14–7 | 67% | 0.02 |
 ancient | A | 18 | 10–8 | 56% | 0.01 |
 inferno | B | 15 | 8–7 | 53% | 0.01 |
 nuke | D | 13 | 4–9 | 31% | 0.00 |
 anubis | D | 10 | 3–7 | 30% | 0.00 |
 dust2 | C | 9 | 4–5 | 44% | -0.00 |
 overpass | A | 5 | 3–2 | 60% | -0.03 |
 train | — | 4 | 3–1 | 75% | 0.03 |
| office | — | 3 | 0–3 | 0% | 0.00 |
 cache | — | 2 | 0–2 | 0% | 0.02 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 161 | 50% | 1.18 | 16.9 |
| Ancient | 94 | 53% | 1.20 | 17.6 |
| Nuke | 39 | 56% | 1.31 | 18.1 |
| Overpass | 29 | 62% | 1.21 | 16.3 |
| Anubis | 29 | 55% | 1.29 | 18.9 |
| Inferno | 29 | 31% | 1.07 | 16.6 |
| Dust2 | 27 | 48% | 1.05 | 15.5 |
| Cache | 6 | 33% | 0.99 | 15.3 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 25.1266% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ancient | 16–14 | 0.05 | 31% | 27 Jul → | |
| anubis | 7–13 | 0.04 | 30% | 17 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–3 | -0.08 | 14% | 17 Jul → | |
| office | 9–13 | -0.04 | 31% | 10 Jul → | |
| nuke | 8–8 | -0.01 | 18% | 10 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 16–14 | 0.01 | 19% | 8 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–3 | 0.08 | 20% | 2 Jul → | |
| cache | 5–13 | 0.04 | 17% | 2 Jul → | |
| anubis | 7–13 | -0.05 | 14% | 1 Jul → | |
| ancient | 13–11 | 0.08 | 19% | 1 Jul → | |
| ancient | 13–11 | 0.03 | 13% | 29 Jun → | |
| ancient | 9–13 | -0.02 | 10% | 29 Jun → | |
| mirage | 13–5 | 0.01 | 18% | 29 Jun → | |
| inferno | 11–13 | 0.00 | 22% | 28 Jun → | |
| dust2 | 7–13 | 0.04 | 28% | 24 Jun → | |
| ancient | 8–13 | -0.06 | 18% | 22 Jun → | |
| anubis | 9–13 | -0.03 | 18% | 7 Jun → | |
| cache | 3–13 | 0.01 | 46% | 4 Jun → | |
| mirage | 13–10 | 0.01 | 22% | 22 May → | |
| ancient | 10–13 | -0.08 | 29% | 20 May → | |
| dust2 | 13–11 | 0.04 | 40% | 13 May → | |
| ancient | 19–17 | -0.00 | 36% | 13 May → | |
| mirage | 8–13 | 0.08 | 27% | 7 May → | |
| nuke | 8–13 | 0.02 | 36% | 5 May → | |
| anubis | 14–16 | -0.00 | 25% | 27 Apr → | |
| train | 13–4 | 0.13 | 37% | 22 Apr → | |
| train | 7–13 | -0.01 | 29% | 22 Apr → | |
| ancient | 8–13 | -0.04 | 10% | 16 Apr → | |
| nuke | 13–6 | 0.11 | 29% | 9 Apr → | |
| nuke | 13–7 | -0.02 | 21% | 8 Apr → | |
| anubis | 13–8 | -0.02 | 18% | 7 Apr → | |
| dust2 | 9–13 | -0.09 | 20% | 7 Apr → | |
| inferno | 5–13 | -0.06 | 14% | 6 Apr → | |
| nuke | 13–11 | -0.02 | 24% | 6 Apr → | |
| overpass | 9–7 | 0.05 | 16% | 5 Apr → | |
| train | 13–6 | 0.02 | 21% | 2 Apr → | |
| anubis | 7–13 | -0.05 | 19% | 2 Apr → | |
| anubis | 13–4 | 0.12 | 28% | 2 Apr → | |
| dust2 | 10–13 | -0.02 | 21% | 1 Apr → | |
| overpass | 13–7 | -0.03 | 30% | 1 Apr → | |
| office | 10–13 | 0.02 | 50% | 12 Mar → | |
| inferno | 9–3 | 0.06 | 28% | 12 Mar → | |
| inferno | 13–6 | 0.06 | 19% | 12 Mar → | |
| ancient | 7–13 | 0.01 | 22% | 8 Mar → | |
| inferno | 16–14 | 0.04 | 16% | 7 Mar → | |
| mirage | 13–4 | 0.06 | 25% | 3 Mar → | |
| overpass | 7–13 | -0.04 | 21% | 3 Mar → | |
| inferno | 13–10 | 0.02 | 33% | 26 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–8 | -0.02 | 34% | 25 Feb → | |
| inferno | 11–13 | 0.09 | 30% | 23 Feb → | |
| mirage | 6–13 | 0.07 | 33% | 20 Feb → | |
| inferno | 13–9 | -0.04 | 22% | 20 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 4–13 | -0.06 | 31% | 20 Feb → | |
| anubis | 10–13 | 0.01 | 32% | 20 Feb → | |
| ancient | 15–15 | 0.01 | 24% | 14 Feb → | |
| mirage | 0–13 | -0.06 | 24% | 11 Feb → | |
| nuke | 15–15 | 0.03 | 17% | 10 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–4 | -0.05 | 23% | 10 Feb → | |
| anubis | 13–7 | 0.01 | 27% | 10 Feb → | |
| ancient | 13–9 | 0.01 | 27% | 10 Feb → | |
| nuke | 9–13 | -0.02 | 19% | 8 Feb → | |
| ancient | 8–13 | -0.00 | 23% | 8 Feb → | |
| overpass | 13–10 | 0.00 | 14% | 8 Feb → | |
| overpass | 0–13 | -0.12 | 24% | 8 Feb → | |
| inferno | 13–3 | 0.01 | 19% | 8 Feb → | |
| inferno | 13–7 | 0.02 | 27% | 8 Feb → | |
| nuke | 4–13 | -0.06 | 11% | 8 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–1 | 0.01 | 17% | 8 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–9 | 0.07 | 34% | 6 Feb → | |
| ancient | 16–12 | -0.03 | 20% | 6 Feb → | |
| office | 7–13 | 0.03 | 52% | 6 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 13–7 | 0.05 | 38% | 6 Feb → | |
| train | 13–10 | -0.00 | 36% | 6 Feb → | |
| anubis | 10–13 | 0.02 | 28% | 6 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 11–13 | 0.02 | 23% | 5 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–9 | 0.09 | 22% | 5 Feb → | |
| mirage | 7–13 | -0.04 | 14% | 5 Feb → | |
| mirage | 5–0 | 0.09 | 19% | 5 Feb → | |
| nuke | 13–7 | 0.03 | 14% | 5 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 13–11 | -0.00 | 21% | 5 Feb → | |
| ancient | 13–8 | -0.01 | 25% | 5 Feb → | |
| inferno | 5–13 | -0.03 | 20% | 5 Feb → | |
| mirage | 11–13 | -0.04 | 33% | 5 Feb → | |
| nuke | 9–13 | -0.05 | 36% | 5 Feb → | |
| inferno | 8–8 | -0.03 | 25% | 5 Feb → | |
| ancient | 13–9 | 0.05 | 20% | 1 Feb → | |
| mirage | 6–13 | 0.02 | 31% | 1 Feb → | |
| inferno | 13–11 | -0.01 | 17% | 31 Jan → | |
| nuke | 6–13 | -0.01 | 20% | 31 Jan → | |
| ancient | 14–16 | 0.05 | 17% | 31 Jan → | |
| mirage | 8–13 | 0.09 | 25% | 31 Jan → | |
| nuke | 8–13 | -0.00 | 39% | 31 Jan → | |
| mirage | 13–5 | 0.02 | 50% | 31 Jan → | |
| ancient | 13–4 | 0.07 | 12% | 31 Jan → | |
| inferno | 8–13 | 0.00 | 35% | 27 Jan → | |
| ancient | 13–5 | 0.05 | 31% | 27 Jan → | |
| mirage | 13–6 | -0.01 | 18% | 27 Jan → | |
| mirage | 13–5 | 0.01 | 25% | 27 Jan → | |
| inferno | 9–13 | -0.03 | 18% | 26 Jan → | |
| nuke | 5–13 | 0.04 | 32% | 26 Jan → |
Match data via Leetify.
