! m0xxie

! m0xxie — CS2 Stats

76561199444181604[U:1:1483915876]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

170Tracked matches50%Win rate2026Tracked since
251Hours in CS12Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.7 LearningHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating14,625Blue band · top ~30.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#25047 of 39964 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,468), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate42.8%41.4%44.2%1.4% short
Shot accuracy0.5%9.0%11.6%11.1% short
Kill/death ratio0.840.971.030.19 short
Match win rate49.9%43.7%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Purple band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG! m0xxiePREMIER14,625 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning43
Utility10

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56368Last 10056%Win rateWWLTLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.2
Aggression5.3
Utility1.0
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels1.1

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 593ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 61% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning4.3
Utility1.0
Mechanics2.4
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact5.0

Composite 3.7/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time605ms−79ms
first ⅓ avg 683ms → last ⅓ avg 605ms
Headshot accuracy14.8%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 15.2% → last ⅓ avg 14.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — mirage 13–1
131Biggest win — office
7Longest win streak
W2Current streak
53In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 86% over 7ancientWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC30131743%-0.02
anubisA138562%-0.02
cacheS108280%-0.02
trainB84450%-0.00
vertigoA85363%-0.03
dust2S76186%-0.00
infernoC73443%-0.01
ancientD62433%-0.03
nukeB63350%-0.01
overpass330100%0.06
office21150%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

6,384Lifetime kills
0.84K/D
437Matches
49.9%Match win rate · Top 10% of Blue band
42.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Blue band
0.5%Shot accuracy
1,107MVPs
130Hours (in match)
264Bombs planted
54Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

557inferno
260dust2
174nuke
129vertigo
96train
94office
2ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.8%Headshot accuracy
37.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
46.2%Spray accuracy
60.6%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
593msReaction time
27.1%T opening success
42.1%CT opening success
0.13Enemies flashed / flash
2.0%Flash assists
2.88HE damage / grenade
1.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.8345% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.1278 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.0734% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–110.009%26 Aug
cache13–40.0017%26 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0540%24 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0622%23 Aug
mirage2–13-0.079%23 Aug
cache8–13-0.0418%19 Aug
ancient13–9-0.037%19 Aug
mirage13–100.0112%18 Aug
nuke13–4-0.0413%18 Aug
mirage8–130.0311%16 Aug
train7–13-0.0311%12 Aug
train12–120.038%12 Aug
mirage7–13-0.060%12 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0917%11 Aug
anubis13–100.0010%31 Jul
mirage9–13-0.049%30 Jul
dust213–20.0212%30 Jul
nuke1–80.0517%30 Jul
vertigo13–6-0.068%29 Jul
vertigo9–2-0.018%29 Jul
inferno13–40.0517%29 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0517%26 Jul
anubis9–13-0.029%26 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0614%24 Jul
cache13–9-0.0413%15 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0210%15 Jul
anubis13–4-0.076%9 Jul
office11–13-0.0039%8 Jul
ancient8–130.019%24 Jun
train13–10-0.0224%19 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0919%19 Jun
train3–13-0.0610%19 Jun
ancient13–40.0444%14 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0620%12 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0010%12 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0515%6 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0324%4 Jun
vertigo8–13-0.0210%4 Jun
vertigo4–0-0.0817%4 Jun
vertigo13–40.099%4 Jun
inferno6–9-0.1412%29 May
anubis13–40.0211%29 May
anubis13–70.0215%28 May
dust213–9-0.0320%22 May
cache8–13-0.0415%22 May
cache13–8-0.0117%22 May
cache13–40.0310%15 May
cache13–10-0.0114%8 May
cache12–3-0.0018%8 May
cache13–7-0.056%8 May
mirage0–9-0.110%30 Apr
mirage12–12-0.0214%30 Apr
train13–3-0.009%24 Apr
inferno7–90.0113%24 Apr
train12–12-0.0310%24 Apr
inferno9–50.0714%24 Apr
mirage13–80.0317%17 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0314%17 Apr
mirage3–13-0.0213%9 Apr
vertigo6–13-0.0017%8 Apr
vertigo13–3-0.036%8 Apr
vertigo4–13-0.1021%8 Apr
overpass16–130.0519%5 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0322%3 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0319%2 Apr
anubis13–6-0.0625%2 Apr
dust213–3-0.037%1 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0525%1 Apr
anubis13–100.0011%1 Apr
anubis13–2-0.0129%29 Mar
mirage13–5-0.0128%28 Mar
dust213–11-0.0312%27 Mar
mirage12–12-0.0714%27 Mar
mirage13–80.0410%22 Mar
nuke16–140.0212%21 Mar
ancient9–13-0.057%21 Mar
office13–10.0310%20 Mar
mirage12–12-0.0210%14 Mar
nuke5–13-0.0522%14 Mar
inferno9–20.062%13 Mar
mirage13–70.0919%13 Mar
overpass13–50.1011%11 Mar
overpass13–40.0123%11 Mar
mirage13–10.1415%11 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0015%8 Mar
mirage13–50.0124%6 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0322%6 Mar
dust25–13-0.057%28 Feb
train13–40.0311%27 Feb
train5–00.0760%27 Feb
mirage12–12-0.0417%22 Feb
anubis12–12-0.0510%21 Feb
dust213–30.087%21 Feb
inferno8–13-0.0820%21 Feb
anubis13–5-0.017%21 Feb
mirage0–13-0.074%21 Feb
dust213–20.037%21 Feb
inferno7–13-0.0710%20 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0518%20 Feb
ancient3–13-0.080%20 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →