vanish — CS2 Stats
76561199440866972[U:1:1480601244]
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,240), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Blue band median | Purple band median | vs Purple band |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 50.0% | 41.7% | 44.1% | above |
| Shot accuracy | 4.5% | 8.8% | 11.4% | 6.9% short |
| Kill/death ratio | 0.75 | 0.97 | 1.03 | 0.28 short |
| Match win rate | 44.0% | 43.8% | 45.2% | 1.2% short |
This profile matches the typical Purple band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Player DNA
Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.
Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match
Plays most like NiKo 71% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.
Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 35% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Reaction time. 558ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 3.8/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nuke | 41 | 54% | 0.95 | 13.6 |
| Mirage | 31 | 55% | 0.76 | 12.5 |
| Ancient | 31 | 55% | 0.75 | 11.2 |
| Cache | 14 | 43% | 0.73 | 11.4 |
| Anubis | 9 | 56% | 0.83 | 11.9 |
| Inferno | 8 | 38% | 0.71 | 9.4 |
| Overpass | 7 | 57% | 0.84 | 11.9 |
| Dust2 | 3 | 33% | 0.76 | 11.7 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Grenades & UtilityGrenade Lineups →
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.1674 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 18.6988% — below the 40% mark we flag