ROaCH

ROaCH — CS2 Stats

76561199390221401[U:1:1429955673]Steam profile ↗

1,390Tracked matches48%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,462Hours in CS60Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.4 Developing
Premier CS Rating21,171Pink band · top ~7.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4148 of 10623 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,077 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGROaCHFACEITLevel 6 · 1,077 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER21,171 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim53
Positioning48
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47512Last 10047%Win rateLWWWLLLLLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.3
Aggression4.9
Utility5.7
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 656ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 62% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.3
Positioning4.8
Utility5.7
Mechanics2.7
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact4.4

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time652ms−33ms
first ⅓ avg 685ms → last ⅓ avg 652ms
Headshot accuracy23.1%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 22.7% → last ⅓ avg 23.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — inferno 12–12
132Biggest win — mirage
4Longest win streak
37In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 12infernoWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2291341%-0.02
mirageB1991047%-0.01
ancientC1771041%-0.03
infernoC135838%0.02
anubisS128467%-0.02
cacheS96367%-0.00
nukeB63350%-0.01
office1010%0.00
vertigo1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

31,872Lifetime kills
0.81K/D
1,937Matches
45.8%Match win rate
46.5%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
3,556MVPs
2,384Hours (in match)
2,308Bombs planted
413Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,973dust2
3,083nuke
2,204inferno
279train
96vertigo
31office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

685Matches
49%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
75.4ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage17146%0.9815.8
Dust214448%0.9314.2
Inferno8850%1.0316.0
Ancient7958%1.1116.4
Nuke7544%1.0817.2
Anubis7548%1.0816.2
Overpass2654%0.9313.5
Cache1867%1.0915.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.6%Headshot accuracy
34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.7%Spray accuracy
62.2%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
656msReaction time
30.7%T opening success
36.0%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
8.7%Flash assists
7.92HE damage / grenade
7.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.6986% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust29–13-0.0410%28 Aug
cache13–30.0429%27 Aug
inferno13–70.0925%27 Aug
dust213–70.0820%27 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0228%26 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0433%25 Aug
dust29–13-0.069%24 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0311%23 Aug
ancient7–130.0315%23 Aug
inferno12–120.1627%20 Aug
inferno13–100.0324%20 Aug
inferno13–90.0026%20 Aug
ancient8–13-0.1220%20 Aug
inferno8–130.0223%20 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0422%19 Aug
office5–130.0041%19 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0622%19 Aug
ancient13–8-0.035%19 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0326%19 Aug
ancient8–130.0125%18 Aug
ancient4–13-0.1124%18 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0116%18 Aug
dust213–6-0.0419%16 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0040%16 Aug
anubis13–50.0130%16 Aug
cache0–13-0.0933%16 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0311%15 Aug
anubis13–70.0014%15 Aug
anubis9–6-0.0446%15 Aug
mirage13–20.0222%15 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0327%15 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0126%15 Aug
dust213–4-0.0012%14 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0517%13 Aug
mirage13–80.0413%13 Aug
dust23–13-0.0020%12 Aug
anubis13–3-0.039%12 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0719%12 Aug
cache13–80.0822%12 Aug
anubis13–100.0111%12 Aug
ancient13–90.0031%11 Aug
mirage11–130.0128%11 Aug
mirage16–12-0.0610%11 Aug
anubis13–160.0420%11 Aug
dust22–13-0.0712%11 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0313%11 Aug
dust27–130.0311%10 Aug
mirage11–130.0115%10 Aug
dust213–10-0.0214%10 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0612%10 Aug
nuke13–90.0120%9 Aug
dust29–130.0016%9 Aug
dust213–90.0526%9 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0516%8 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0217%8 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0331%7 Aug
cache13–70.1019%7 Aug
vertigo10–13-0.0313%7 Aug
ancient16–13-0.0314%6 Aug
dust28–13-0.058%6 Aug
dust213–80.0113%6 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0210%5 Aug
cache8–13-0.0213%5 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0526%4 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0313%4 Aug
dust213–9-0.025%4 Aug
mirage13–50.0323%4 Aug
cache13–7-0.0715%4 Aug
inferno9–130.0122%3 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0515%3 Aug
inferno17–190.0016%3 Aug
anubis16–13-0.0021%2 Aug
dust24–13-0.0330%2 Aug
dust213–5-0.0018%2 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0050%1 Aug
nuke15–150.0217%1 Aug
cache13–80.0322%1 Aug
ancient13–100.0126%31 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0136%31 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0821%31 Jul
inferno13–40.1030%29 Jul
cache13–11-0.0116%29 Jul
ancient16–13-0.0217%29 Jul
dust26–13-0.0819%29 Jul
dust26–13-0.0424%29 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0423%29 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0218%28 Jul
ancient10–130.0119%28 Jul
dust23–130.0118%27 Jul
dust29–13-0.0314%26 Jul
mirage13–20.0223%24 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0323%24 Jul
dust213–11-0.0640%23 Jul
dust211–130.0216%23 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0027%22 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0621%21 Jul
inferno13–80.0128%21 Jul
cache9–13-0.086%21 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0222%20 Jul
mirage13–100.0138%20 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →