Heino — CS2 Stats

76561199376588521[U:1:1416322793]

282Tracked matches54%Win rate2023Tracked since
230Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating18,461Purple band · top ~14.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#24473 of 52433 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,966), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate43.9%47.0%48.5%4.7% short
Shot accuracy2.6%12.7%13.3%10.6% short
Kill/death ratio1.281.071.07above
Match win rate52.2%46.4%47.0%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHeinoFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER18,461 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning46
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53434Last 10053%Win rateWWLWWLWLTT

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.2
Aggression4.3
Utility4.7
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.4
Clutch4.2

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 662ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning4.6
Utility4.7
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time674ms+24ms
first ⅓ avg 650ms → last ⅓ avg 674ms
Headshot accuracy15.4%−3.7%
first ⅓ avg 19.0% → last ⅓ avg 15.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — mirage 13–1
131Biggest win — cache
7Longest win streak
W2Current streak
87In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 75% over 8infernoWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B25131252%0.01
mirageC1981142%0.00
cacheB137654%0.02
infernoC135838%-0.00
nukeA106460%-0.00
ancientA95456%0.01
anubisS86275%0.04
overpass220100%0.08
warden110100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

11,314Lifetime kills
1.28K/D · Top 25% of Level 8 players
592Matches
52.2%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 8 players
43.9%Headshot %
2.6%Shot accuracy
1,567MVPs
230Hours (in match)
711Bombs planted
197Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,578dust2
868inferno
556nuke
90vertigo
53train
1office
1ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

189Matches
52%Win rate
1.36Avg K/D
89.8ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6447%1.3618.7
Dust25056%1.4018.6
Inferno3656%1.3417.9
Ancient1331%1.0417.0
Nuke1164%1.5817.9
Anubis862%1.3620.4
Overpass683%1.3219.2
Train10%1.4529.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.3%Headshot accuracy
42.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.3%Spray accuracy
87.0%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
662msReaction time
22.4%T opening success
48.9%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
3.1%Flash assists
5.41HE damage / grenade
3.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.9068 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.3584% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–100.0712%10 May
cache13–9-0.0117%9 May
cache8–13-0.0717%5 May
cache13–80.0315%5 May
ancient13–6-0.0814%3 May
cache4–13-0.0622%2 May
cache13–100.079%2 May
cache8–130.0120%2 May
cache12–12-0.0221%1 May
cache12–120.0326%1 May
cache13–10.057%1 May
cache13–20.0210%29 Apr
cache13–20.1118%29 Apr
cache11–13-0.0121%29 Apr
dust25–13-0.0323%28 Apr
dust25–13-0.0113%28 Apr
dust213–110.0513%26 Apr
mirage13–5-0.0712%23 Apr
anubis8–130.0617%21 Apr
mirage13–10.138%21 Apr
ancient13–30.0411%20 Apr
mirage1–13-0.0310%20 Apr
dust213–40.0217%20 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0216%20 Apr
mirage13–40.0511%20 Apr
ancient10–130.0413%19 Apr
nuke13–160.0117%19 Apr
dust21–13-0.0622%19 Apr
mirage10–130.0711%19 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0111%18 Apr
dust26–130.0024%18 Apr
nuke10–130.0414%18 Apr
dust213–50.0116%16 Apr
inferno13–30.0413%16 Apr
nuke13–6-0.0113%14 Apr
dust213–9-0.0412%14 Apr
mirage13–110.0424%13 Apr
dust213–80.0923%12 Apr
overpass13–30.0422%12 Apr
mirage14–16-0.0114%10 Apr
ancient7–13-0.038%10 Apr
anubis13–50.048%6 Apr
inferno3–13-0.0513%6 Apr
overpass13–110.1212%5 Apr
mirage13–60.0413%5 Apr
mirage3–13-0.045%3 Apr
dust29–130.0319%27 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0415%26 Mar
mirage13–10-0.004%26 Mar
dust216–14-0.0418%3 Mar
dust29–13-0.0114%3 Mar
dust214–16-0.037%1 Mar
ancient4–13-0.0218%22 Feb
inferno3–13-0.0417%16 Feb
warden13–50.0211%15 Feb
inferno12–120.0118%15 Feb
mirage9–130.0124%14 Feb
dust213–9-0.0528%14 Feb
anubis13–5-0.0226%13 Feb
dust26–13-0.0817%13 Feb
inferno13–90.0026%22 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0411%17 Aug
dust28–130.0112%27 Jul
mirage9–130.0215%20 Jul
nuke11–0-0.0216%16 Jul
anubis13–80.008%15 Jul
anubis2–130.0934%13 Jul
ancient0–20.0550%13 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0210%13 Jul
dust21–13-0.0724%13 Jul
dust213–80.0619%13 Jul
nuke13–110.0124%12 Jul
ancient16–120.0315%12 Jul
dust213–11-0.0115%11 Jul
inferno12–120.0211%9 Jul
dust213–90.0520%21 Mar
anubis13–100.0819%13 Mar
mirage4–13-0.0528%10 Mar
inferno13–20.1057%9 Mar
inferno13–7-0.0112%9 Mar
inferno13–70.0326%9 Mar
dust213–6-0.033%9 Mar
ancient13–60.105%9 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0210%8 Mar
ancient13–7-0.0512%8 Mar
dust27–130.1320%1 Mar
mirage10–130.0125%1 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0227%1 Mar
nuke13–8-0.006%26 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0421%26 Feb
inferno2–13-0.0418%16 Feb
dust214–16-0.0516%16 Feb
nuke11–13-0.0218%14 Feb
anubis13–110.0514%14 Feb
inferno8–13-0.0620%13 Feb
mirage13–70.0516%13 Feb
dust213–30.1123%12 Feb
mirage0–3-0.060%12 Feb
dust213–70.0820%12 Feb
nuke13–70.0426%11 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →