Swank — CS2 Stats
US76561199268065941[U:1:1307800213]Steam profile ↗
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 10 median | vs Level 10 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 36.5% | 52.8% | 16.3% short |
| Shot accuracy | 3.1% | 13.7% | 10.6% short |
| Kill/death ratio | 1.19 | 1.08 | above |
| Match win rate | 49.8% | 49.2% | meets |
This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.
Strong CT-side opener
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like donk 94% playstyle similarity
Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
CT openings. 70% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.
Areas to improve
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 70% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 8.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 20 | 11–9 | 55% | 0.03 | |
| A | 20 | 12–8 | 60% | 0.02 | |
| A | 18 | 10–8 | 56% | 0.04 | |
| S | 17 | 12–5 | 71% | 0.04 | |
| B | 10 | 5–5 | 50% | -0.00 | |
| A | 9 | 5–4 | 56% | 0.01 | |
| — | 4 | 1–3 | 25% | -0.01 | |
| — | 2 | 0–2 | 0% | 0.02 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ancient | 190 | 53% | 1.41 | 20.0 |
| Inferno | 145 | 48% | 1.33 | 19.6 |
| Nuke | 139 | 58% | 1.41 | 20.6 |
| Anubis | 133 | 49% | 1.40 | 20.0 |
| Mirage | 125 | 50% | 1.23 | 18.7 |
| Dust2 | 77 | 43% | 1.11 | 16.8 |
| Vertigo | 47 | 49% | 1.45 | 21.6 |
| Overpass | 40 | 42% | 1.34 | 19.2 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Best CS2 CrosshairAim Training →
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 11.2192% — below the 15% mark we flag
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 34.4144% — below the 40% mark we flag
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4–13 | -0.00 | 16% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.07 | 9% | 22 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.08 | 11% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.02 | 6% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 19–17 | 0.00 | 11% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 0–7 | -0.10 | 0% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 1–13 | 0.04 | 8% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.01 | 8% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.05 | 8% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.01 | 17% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.08 | 3% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.05 | 13% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.06 | 4% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.06 | 10% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.03 | 12% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.01 | 9% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 13–16 | 0.03 | 12% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 16–19 | 0.00 | 9% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 1–13 | -0.01 | 29% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.02 | 19% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 22–25 | 0.05 | 11% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.00 | 12% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.01 | 8% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 15–15 | -0.01 | 9% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 8–0 | 0.07 | 10% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.15 | 13% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 7–2 | 0.15 | 14% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.04 | 20% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.06 | 13% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.10 | 12% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 5–13 | 0.01 | 29% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.01 | 5% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.11 | 9% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.02 | 14% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.00 | 10% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 15–15 | 0.02 | 11% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 16–14 | 0.02 | 7% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.14 | 10% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 16–13 | 0.01 | 20% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.08 | 3% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.11 | 40% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.05 | 15% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.06 | 6% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.08 | 14% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.02 | 8% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 16–13 | 0.05 | 11% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.10 | 19% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.03 | 8% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.00 | 11% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 13–4 | -0.00 | 16% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.02 | 13% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.05 | 18% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 4–13 | 0.06 | 13% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.06 | 34% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 13–16 | -0.03 | 6% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 4–13 | 0.01 | 15% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.11 | 13% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.01 | 14% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.15 | 8% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.03 | 20% | 26 Jul → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.12 | 7% | 26 Jul → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.06 | 16% | 26 Jul → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.01 | 13% | 25 Jul → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.03 | 7% | 25 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.06 | 13% | 25 Jul → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.03 | 20% | 22 Jul → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.05 | 7% | 22 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.08 | 18% | 22 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.01 | 14% | 22 Jul → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.01 | 11% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 12–16 | -0.00 | 9% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.01 | 3% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.04 | 14% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.05 | 2% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 4–10 | 0.08 | 6% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.02 | 18% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 12–16 | 0.04 | 19% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.01 | 16% | 20 Jul → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.02 | 15% | 20 Jul → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.02 | 5% | 20 Jul → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.03 | 9% | 20 Jul → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.04 | 16% | 20 Jul → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.07 | 24% | 20 Jul → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.00 | 16% | 20 Jul → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.05 | 3% | 20 Jul → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.02 | 7% | 19 Jul → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.03 | 8% | 19 Jul → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.05 | 10% | 19 Jul → | ||
| 12–16 | -0.03 | 14% | 18 Jul → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.04 | 18% | 18 Jul → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.01 | 15% | 18 Jul → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.06 | 3% | 18 Jul → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.00 | 9% | 17 Jul → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.01 | 19% | 17 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.05 | 18% | 17 Jul → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.02 | 14% | 17 Jul → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.04 | 18% | 17 Jul → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.03 | 18% | 16 Jul → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.09 | 13% | 15 Jul → | ||
| 15–15 | -0.03 | 10% | 14 Jul → |
Match data via Leetify.