Madziulecka — CS2 Stats
PL76561199258977698[U:1:1298711970]Steam profile ↗
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,789), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Purple band median | Pink band median | vs Pink band |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 52.0% | 44.1% | 47.2% | above |
| Shot accuracy | 11.1% | 11.4% | 12.7% | 1.7% short |
| Kill/death ratio | 1.53 | 1.03 | 1.09 | above |
| Match win rate | 55.8% | 45.2% | 46.6% | above |
This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.
Sharp aimerEffective flashes
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match
Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity
Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.
Where you differ: lower positioning profile.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.
Flashes. 0.77 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.
Areas to improve
Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 51 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 77 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 mirage | A | 35 | 21–14 | 60% | 0.02 |
 dust2 | A | 21 | 13–8 | 62% | 0.03 |
 nuke | A | 7 | 4–3 | 57% | 0.04 |
 ancient | S | 5 | 4–1 | 80% | 0.12 |
 inferno | A | 5 | 3–2 | 60% | -0.03 |
 anubis | — | 2 | 0–2 | 0% | 0.02 |
| grail | — | 2 | 1–1 | 50% | -0.02 |
Across the last 77 tracked matches.
Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (57% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 7 | 71% | 1.24 | 17.0 |
| Dust2 | 5 | 80% | 1.22 | 19.0 |
| Ancient | 4 | 75% | 1.08 | 14.8 |
| Nuke | 1 | 100% | 1.92 | 25.0 |
| Anubis | 1 | 100% | 0.90 | 19.0 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 38.6042% — below the 40% mark we flag
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mirage | 13–0 | 0.00 | 15% | 27 Jun → | |
| dust2 | 13–0 | 0.02 | 42% | 27 Jun → | |
| mirage | 13–11 | 0.05 | 42% | 26 Jun → | |
| dust2 | 3–13 | -0.05 | 30% | 26 Jun → | |
| ancient | 6–13 | 0.06 | 50% | 26 Jun → | |
| nuke | 0–2 | -0.01 | 0% | 26 Jun → | |
| mirage | 13–5 | 0.02 | 29% | 12 Feb → | |
| mirage | 0–7 | -0.08 | 25% | 12 Feb → | |
| inferno | 6–1 | -0.08 | 100% | 12 Feb → | |
| mirage | 4–13 | -0.06 | 25% | 9 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 13–2 | 0.11 | 23% | 9 Feb → | |
| inferno | 13–4 | -0.02 | 12% | 9 Feb → | |
| inferno | 6–13 | -0.04 | 12% | 9 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 5–13 | -0.02 | 21% | 9 Feb → | |
| inferno | 13–1 | -0.00 | 10% | 9 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–3 | -0.01 | 16% | 9 Feb → | |
| nuke | 13–6 | -0.02 | 12% | 9 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 4–13 | -0.04 | 23% | 9 Feb → | |
| nuke | 9–6 | 0.08 | 15% | 9 Feb → | |
| anubis | 5–13 | -0.04 | 16% | 9 Feb → | |
| anubis | 2–13 | 0.07 | 31% | 8 Feb → | |
| mirage | 10–13 | 0.09 | 19% | 7 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 13–10 | 0.04 | 25% | 7 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 13–5 | 0.05 | 26% | 7 Feb → | |
| nuke | 6–13 | 0.02 | 73% | 7 Feb → | |
| ancient | 16–13 | 0.13 | 40% | 6 Feb → | |
| mirage | 1–13 | -0.04 | 8% | 6 Feb → | |
| mirage | 0–13 | -0.11 | 33% | 6 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 1–13 | -0.02 | 19% | 6 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 13–5 | 0.03 | 19% | 6 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 1–13 | -0.04 | 27% | 6 Feb → | |
| nuke | 13–10 | 0.12 | 15% | 6 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 13–1 | 0.03 | 24% | 6 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–4 | 0.07 | 15% | 6 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 11–13 | 0.16 | 23% | 6 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 13–11 | 0.03 | 23% | 6 Feb → | |
| mirage | 4–6 | -0.03 | 25% | 6 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–6 | 0.06 | 44% | 6 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 6–13 | -0.07 | 23% | 6 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–7 | 0.03 | 24% | 6 Feb → | |
| ancient | 16–13 | 0.14 | 18% | 6 Feb → | |
| nuke | 13–9 | 0.07 | 20% | 6 Feb → | |
| ancient | 13–1 | 0.19 | 26% | 5 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 16–14 | 0.05 | 25% | 5 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 13–6 | -0.00 | 13% | 5 Feb → | |
| mirage | 7–13 | -0.01 | 20% | 5 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 13–4 | 0.03 | 26% | 5 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–6 | 0.02 | 24% | 5 Feb → | |
| nuke | 15–15 | 0.00 | 25% | 5 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–9 | 0.02 | 26% | 5 Feb → | |
| mirage | 8–13 | 0.01 | 17% | 5 Feb → | |
| ancient | 13–8 | 0.09 | 16% | 5 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 13–6 | 0.01 | 21% | 5 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–0 | 0.16 | 32% | 1 Jan → | |
| mirage | 9–13 | 0.01 | 15% | 7 Dec → | |
| mirage | 13–9 | 0.10 | 27% | 23 Nov → | |
| mirage | 13–10 | 0.10 | 31% | 13 Nov → | |
| mirage | 13–7 | -0.03 | 30% | 13 Nov → | |
| dust2 | 8–13 | 0.09 | 26% | 13 Nov → | |
| mirage | 3–13 | -0.09 | 5% | 16 May → | |
| mirage | 8–13 | -0.06 | 11% | 16 May → | |
| grail | 1–13 | -0.00 | 17% | 12 May → | |
| grail | 13–6 | -0.04 | 14% | 12 May → | |
| mirage | 8–13 | -0.06 | 8% | 1 May → | |
| mirage | 3–13 | -0.09 | 13% | 30 Apr → | |
| mirage | 7–3 | -0.13 | 20% | 29 Apr → | |
| mirage | 13–8 | -0.10 | 9% | 29 Apr → | |
| mirage | 13–0 | 0.15 | 20% | 10 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 13–7 | 0.10 | 26% | 10 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–2 | 0.24 | 34% | 12 Jan → | |
| inferno | 8–16 | -0.01 | 26% | 15 Jan → | |
| mirage | 7–2 | 0.19 | 39% | 26 Dec → | |
| mirage | 16–7 | 0.09 | 15% | 1 Oct → | |
| mirage | 16–8 | 0.06 | 22% | 28 Sept → | |
| mirage | 16–13 | 0.10 | 26% | 26 Sept → | |
| mirage | 15–15 | 0.08 | 22% | 29 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 9–7 | 0.15 | 20% | 13 Aug → |
Match data via Leetify.