BigTrev94 — CS2 Stats

HM76561199238329993[U:1:1278064265]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

573Tracked matches24%Win rate2023Tracked since

367Hours in CS

CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating16,930Purple band · top ~20.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#27657 of 51898 tracked

FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,149), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 3 median	Level 4 median	vs Level 4
Headshot rate	37.9%	42.2%	42.7%	4.8% short
Shot accuracy	9.6%	11.9%	10.8%	1.1% short
Kill/death ratio	0.92	0.98	1.00	0.08 short
Match win rate	38.2%	43.6%	44.1%	6.0% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 4 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63

Positioning45

Utility27

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD40–56–4Last 10040%Win rateLLLLLLLLWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.3

Aggression3.4

Utility2.7

Positioning4.5

Opening Duels1.8

Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3

Positioning4.5

Utility2.7

Mechanics7.5

Opening Duels2.0

Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time595ms+9ms

first ⅓ avg 587ms → last ⅓ avg 595ms

Headshot accuracy9.9%−3.0%

first ⅓ avg 12.9% → last ⅓ avg 9.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — shelter 13–7

13–2Biggest win — ancient

5Longest win streak

L8Current streak

5–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

3Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 56% over 9cacheWeakest map · 27% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	22	9–13	41%	0.01
ancient	C	21	8–13	38%	0.01
mirage	C	19	7–12	37%	-0.01
cache	D	11	3–8	27%	0.02
inferno	C	9	4–5	44%	-0.01
anubis	A	9	5–4	56%	0.02
shelter	—	3	2–1	67%	0.05
office	—	2	0–2	0%	0.01
fachwerk	—	1	1–0	100%	0.08
nuke	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.07
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.02
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

21,999Lifetime kills

0.92K/D

1,224Matches

38.2%Match win rate

37.9%Headshot %

9.6%Shot accuracy

1,403MVPs

367Hours (in match)

440Bombs planted

166Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

M4A4 / M4A1-S5,570

AK-474,125

AWP2,638

MP71,340

SG 553846

SSG 08758

P2000 / USP-S745

Desert Eagle706

Glock-18599

MAC-10490

Lifetime map wins

3,417dust2

1,135inferno

394office

268vertigo

104train

74nuke

60italy

2ar_monastery

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

33Matches

42%Win rate

0.96Avg K/D

89.9ADR

27%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	2	0%	1.12	19.0
Ancient	1	0%	1.14	24.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

10.0%Headshot accuracy

35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.1%Spray accuracy

83.9%Counter-strafing

11.1°Preaim

586msReaction time

28.5%T opening success

45.9%CT opening success

0.37Enemies flashed / flash

1.6%Flash assists

8.68HE damage / grenade

4.17Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 9.9669% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3722 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.5431% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	4–13	0.05	15%	24 Aug →
inferno	3–13	0.02	14%	21 Aug →
anubis	5–6	0.05	10%	21 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	11%	21 Aug →
ancient	1–13	-0.03	4%	16 Aug →
anubis	14–16	0.03	11%	13 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.06	13%	8 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.06	10%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.04	15%	3 Aug →
inferno	15–15	-0.01	6%	3 Aug →
ancient	1–13	-0.04	19%	3 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.06	3%	2 Aug →
ancient	5–13	0.10	9%	2 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.01	13%	1 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.03	6%	1 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.02	9%	1 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.01	9%	29 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.02	10%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.09	10%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.02	8%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.01	9%	28 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.01	14%	27 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.00	6%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.09	7%	27 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.05	10%	26 Jul →
shelter	6–13	0.01	6%	25 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.02	8%	25 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.02	3%	24 Jul →
inferno	3–13	0.03	24%	24 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.01	7%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.06	5%	23 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.03	13%	23 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.06	7%	23 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.01	3%	23 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	9%	23 Jul →
office	8–13	0.03	3%	22 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	11%	22 Jul →
fachwerk	13–6	0.08	5%	21 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.07	4%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.11	8%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.01	5%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	15%	21 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.01	7%	21 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.01	14%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–3	-0.03	16%	20 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.01	16%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	6%	20 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.00	18%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.00	7%	20 Jul →
overpass	13–11	-0.02	7%	19 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	17%	19 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.02	15%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	21%	19 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.02	14%	19 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.03	14%	18 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.08	9%	18 Jul →
dust2	1–13	-0.10	11%	18 Jul →
shelter	13–7	0.13	16%	17 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.03	13%	17 Jul →
ancient	9–13	0.02	16%	17 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.02	4%	16 Jul →
vertigo	4–13	-0.02	10%	16 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.00	13%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	5%	15 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.04	10%	15 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.06	10%	15 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.02	12%	15 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.01	10%	14 Jul →
shelter	13–4	0.02	10%	14 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.02	6%	14 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.11	9%	13 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.03	11%	13 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.04	11%	13 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.08	25%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.03	17%	12 Jul →
cache	1–13	-0.05	28%	12 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.05	16%	12 Jul →
dust2	12–16	0.01	17%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.06	2%	12 Jul →
mirage	2–13	0.01	5%	12 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.05	14%	11 Jul →
anubis	8–13	0.01	10%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	16%	10 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.05	7%	10 Jul →
anubis	13–3	-0.00	15%	10 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.01	15%	10 Jul →
inferno	13–4	-0.05	23%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.10	12%	9 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.06	11%	9 Jul →
ancient	13–6	-0.00	7%	9 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.07	12%	9 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.00	12%	9 Jul →
ancient	6–13	0.01	5%	9 Jul →
dust2	11–5	0.03	21%	9 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.08	10%	8 Jul →
office	10–13	-0.02	5%	7 Jul →
dust2	13–5	-0.03	22%	7 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.06	20%	6 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.03	11%	6 Jul →
anubis	13–6	-0.01	12%	6 Jul →