Beckham

Beckham — CS2 Stats

76561199229527089[U:1:1269261361]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

785Tracked matches53%Win rate2022Tracked since
887Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidHybrid Rifler
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning52
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT5149Last 10051%Win rateWWWLLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.9
Aggression5.7
Utility4.5
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 634ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning5.2
Utility4.5
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time637ms−31ms
first ⅓ avg 668ms → last ⅓ avg 637ms
Headshot accuracy22.0%+2.2%
first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 22.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.51Best rating — nuke 2–0
133Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
1213In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 9infernoWeakest map · 46% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB32161650%0.00
dust2B29141548%-0.01
infernoB136746%0.03
nukeS96367%0.06
anubisB84450%-0.02
overpassB63350%0.01
ancient32167%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (46% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

14,352Lifetime kills
0.98K/D
881Matches
50.3%Match win rate · Top 25% of tracked players
50.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
1.0%Shot accuracy
1,978MVPs
348Hours (in match)
1,206Bombs planted
226Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,426dust2
1,294inferno
1,139nuke
221train
47vertigo

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

272Matches
50%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
79.3ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust29153%1.0715.4
Mirage8254%1.0515.6
Nuke3060%1.1716.4
Anubis2548%1.0716.3
Inferno2433%1.0917.4
Overpass1020%1.0916.2
Ancient520%0.9214.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.5%Headshot accuracy
36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.9%Spray accuracy
83.7%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
634msReaction time
20.4%T opening success
52.0%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
3.4%Flash assists
7.80HE damage / grenade
5.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4861 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.3742% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

46% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–11-0.0219%28 Aug
ancient13–110.0122%20 Jun
mirage13–60.0530%1 Jun
overpass13–16-0.0226%18 May
nuke10–13-0.065%2 May
mirage13–11-0.0128%25 Apr
overpass13–70.0820%15 Apr
dust213–10-0.0424%12 Apr
inferno9–70.0922%11 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0039%11 Apr
dust213–3-0.0226%10 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0429%9 Apr
nuke13–60.0415%8 Apr
inferno9–60.0215%7 Apr
mirage13–100.0320%7 Apr
ancient13–40.0113%7 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0012%2 Apr
mirage13–100.0112%1 Apr
dust210–00.0113%1 Apr
mirage12–16-0.0418%1 Apr
anubis19–22-0.0320%31 Mar
dust27–13-0.0513%31 Mar
nuke13–9-0.0119%31 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0621%30 Mar
mirage11–130.0024%29 Mar
overpass13–10-0.0220%29 Mar
anubis13–8-0.0129%28 Mar
mirage7–130.1224%28 Mar
inferno14–16-0.0041%27 Mar
dust214–160.0120%27 Mar
mirage13–100.0328%27 Mar
dust24–13-0.1129%27 Mar
mirage13–80.0828%26 Mar
dust29–130.0329%26 Mar
mirage1–13-0.1030%26 Mar
inferno13–100.0526%25 Mar
dust213–110.0126%25 Mar
dust213–110.0128%25 Mar
dust25–130.0321%25 Mar
mirage14–16-0.0346%25 Mar
mirage13–100.0132%24 Mar
dust213–100.1023%24 Mar
inferno11–130.029%24 Mar
nuke10–130.0131%23 Mar
dust214–160.0029%23 Mar
mirage13–8-0.010%23 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0420%23 Mar
anubis13–8-0.0316%22 Mar
mirage16–13-0.0116%19 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0127%18 Mar
overpass10–130.0021%18 Mar
dust24–13-0.0310%18 Mar
mirage13–110.0328%18 Mar
nuke2–00.5125%18 Mar
inferno13–90.0717%18 Mar
inferno7–130.0214%17 Mar
anubis10–130.0120%16 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0617%16 Mar
dust216–130.0319%9 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0422%9 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0210%9 Mar
dust22–13-0.0735%8 Mar
dust214–16-0.0122%8 Mar
anubis13–6-0.0215%7 Mar
inferno1–9-0.0045%7 Mar
dust28–13-0.067%6 Mar
mirage5–13-0.017%5 Mar
inferno13–100.0316%5 Mar
overpass13–6-0.0125%3 Mar
dust213–40.0815%3 Mar
dust216–13-0.0521%3 Mar
mirage13–70.1122%2 Mar
anubis11–13-0.0620%2 Mar
dust28–13-0.0318%28 Feb
mirage16–120.0214%27 Feb
dust28–130.0131%27 Feb
dust213–8-0.0329%27 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0427%27 Feb
ancient5–130.0120%26 Feb
mirage7–130.0430%26 Feb
nuke13–90.0317%26 Feb
inferno9–50.1214%25 Feb
mirage13–90.0126%25 Feb
nuke13–80.0215%24 Feb
dust213–110.0318%23 Feb
dust29–13-0.038%23 Feb
dust213–60.0929%23 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0217%22 Feb
dust211–13-0.0323%22 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0312%21 Feb
nuke13–110.0528%20 Feb
dust22–13-0.1013%19 Feb
mirage10–130.0425%19 Feb
overpass10–130.0221%19 Feb
dust213–110.0125%19 Feb
mirage13–70.0220%18 Feb
dust213–4-0.0018%18 Feb
nuke9–13-0.036%18 Feb
mirage10–130.0417%15 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0016%15 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →