Sjösnigeln

Sjösnigeln — CS2 Stats

SE76561199229406097[U:1:1269140369]Steam profile ↗

456Tracked matches56%Win rate2022Tracked since
680Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,062 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSjösnigelnFACEITLevel 5 · 1,062 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning56
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48484Last 10048%Win rateWLLLLWLLWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.1
Aggression8.7
Utility6.1
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch5.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 632ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning5.6
Utility6.1
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact6.9

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time643ms−4ms
first ⅓ avg 647ms → last ⅓ avg 643ms
Headshot accuracy17.3%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 15.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — mirage 10–0
130Biggest win — dust2
3Longest win streak
79In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 63% over 8anubisWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA22121055%0.02
dust2B22111150%0.01
nukeA148657%0.02
infernoD124833%-0.07
ancientA85363%0.04
cacheA85363%0.04
anubisD5050%-0.04
vertigo42250%0.03
office3030%0.02
poseidon1010%-0.26
overpass110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

37,675Lifetime kills
1.05K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
2,458Matches
47.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of tracked players
42.0%Headshot %
6.4%Shot accuracy
6,891MVPs
680Hours (in match)
2,067Bombs planted
612Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,362inferno
2,701nuke
2,471dust2
1,037vertigo
598lake
403cbble
220train
46office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

86Matches
50%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
89.4ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
36%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2245%1.1416.8
Dust21644%1.2017.1
Ancient1362%1.2517.0
Nuke1060%1.2519.3
Anubis683%1.3516.8
Inferno475%1.2513.8
Overpass367%1.2119.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
37.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.9%Spray accuracy
85.5%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
632msReaction time
36.6%T opening success
53.1%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
15.59HE damage / grenade
15.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.5788% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–6-0.0117%11 Jul
nuke3–9-0.1617%11 Jul
mirage11–130.0619%1 Jul
ancient14–160.0118%20 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0617%14 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0015%12 Jun
vertigo5–9-0.058%12 Jun
mirage9–130.0631%11 Jun
ancient13–80.1520%11 Jun
dust212–120.0420%10 Jun
vertigo13–50.0416%10 Jun
mirage13–100.0010%4 Jun
dust27–130.0036%4 Jun
vertigo9–130.0715%3 Jun
inferno2–9-0.049%3 Jun
vertigo13–70.0616%3 Jun
inferno1–9-0.1925%3 Jun
nuke13–110.0318%2 Jun
dust26–13-0.0713%2 Jun
dust211–13-0.0015%1 Jun
dust213–90.0610%1 Jun
nuke13–110.0417%1 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0810%31 May
mirage7–13-0.0321%31 May
cache12–120.1018%31 May
inferno1–13-0.0817%31 May
dust213–11-0.0419%31 May
mirage12–120.0719%30 May
mirage13–40.1623%30 May
ancient13–40.0312%30 May
dust25–130.0211%30 May
cache13–5-0.0220%30 May
dust213–80.0920%30 May
mirage6–130.0310%29 May
dust213–50.1021%29 May
mirage13–50.0219%29 May
ancient13–7-0.0311%29 May
anubis4–13-0.0620%29 May
dust213–80.0345%27 May
inferno7–90.0227%27 May
mirage13–30.0817%27 May
anubis8–130.0031%27 May
anubis9–13-0.0214%27 May
ancient13–80.1317%26 May
mirage6–130.0315%26 May
cache13–8-0.0119%26 May
dust213–100.0822%25 May
nuke8–130.1023%25 May
mirage5–13-0.0811%25 May
dust213–100.0312%25 May
inferno9–70.0423%25 May
mirage13–4-0.0222%24 May
dust22–13-0.048%24 May
nuke9–6-0.0315%24 May
inferno1–9-0.2016%22 May
inferno5–13-0.0910%20 May
ancient9–13-0.0211%20 May
nuke9–50.068%20 May
nuke9–10.2126%20 May
anubis2–13-0.0619%19 May
cache9–130.0210%19 May
inferno13–5-0.0121%19 May
dust28–13-0.0216%18 May
nuke10–13-0.0315%18 May
mirage13–5-0.0415%18 May
dust213–5-0.0328%17 May
mirage9–13-0.0119%17 May
inferno9–5-0.0130%17 May
poseidon3–9-0.260%17 May
dust213–30.0417%14 May
office10–130.0212%13 May
cache2–130.0120%13 May
office5–130.0425%13 May
office2–130.0111%13 May
dust213–3-0.0223%12 May
dust213–00.0519%12 May
dust211–13-0.0315%11 May
inferno9–5-0.075%11 May
ancient6–13-0.0013%11 May
mirage10–00.2115%11 May
nuke8–130.0221%11 May
mirage13–70.0223%11 May
mirage11–130.0010%10 May
dust27–13-0.0013%10 May
cache13–10-0.0120%10 May
cache13–50.1419%9 May
nuke7–9-0.070%8 May
ancient13–110.0116%8 May
dust27–130.0115%8 May
nuke13–70.0613%7 May
mirage13–70.0720%5 May
dust212–120.014%4 May
overpass9–70.0116%4 May
mirage14–16-0.0521%4 May
inferno7–9-0.0614%3 May
nuke9–130.0515%2 May
cache13–10.1123%2 May
inferno2–9-0.174%2 May
nuke13–9-0.0121%1 May
mirage13–8-0.0216%1 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →