᲼ — CS2 Stats

76561199209548490[U:1:1249282762]✓ No bans

472Tracked matches52%Win rate2025Tracked since

1,030Hours in CS51Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating9,669Light Blue band · top ~56.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#31364 of 43128 tracked

FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,711), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 4 median	Level 5 median	vs Level 5
Headshot rate	38.9%	42.7%	44.0%	5.1% short
Shot accuracy	2.9%	10.8%	11.6%	8.7% short
Kill/death ratio	2.05	1.00	1.03	above
Match win rate	49.2%	44.1%	45.1%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72

Positioning49

Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY38–59–3Last 10038%Win rateTWWLLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.2

Aggression5.3

Utility3.6

Positioning4.9

Opening Duels1.0

Clutch3.6

Strong T-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 42% on T to 26% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 605ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2

Positioning4.9

Utility3.6

Mechanics6.9

Opening Duels1.5

Win Impact5.6

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time596ms−62ms

first ⅓ avg 658ms → last ⅓ avg 596ms

Headshot accuracy12.0%−3.8%

first ⅓ avg 15.8% → last ⅓ avg 12.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — ancient 13–9

13–2Biggest win — nuke

4Longest win streak

6–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

4Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 64% over 14nukeWeakest map · 17% over 18

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	C	21	8–13	38%	0.03
nuke	D	18	3–15	17%	0.03
ancient	C	16	6–10	38%	0.05
anubis	A	14	9–5	64%	0.06
dust2	C	11	4–7	36%	0.03
mirage	D	10	2–8	20%	0.01
inferno	A	5	3–2	60%	0.04
overpass	—	4	3–1	75%	0.00
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

41,238Lifetime kills

2.05K/D · Top 5% of Level 4 players

1,829Matches

49.2%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 4 players

38.9%Headshot %

2.9%Shot accuracy

4,978MVPs

492Hours (in match)

1,582Bombs planted

604Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP10,925

AK-478,861

M4A4 / M4A1-S4,874

P2000 / USP-S2,981

Desert Eagle2,029

Glock-181,199

MP71,037

SSG 08930

Molotov863

MP9690

Lifetime map wins

2,887dust2

1,942inferno

827nuke

685vertigo

307train

45office

41ar_shoots

32ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

16Matches

38%Win rate

1.26Avg K/D

85.6ADR

29%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

38%1v2 clutch win

3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Anubis	4	75%	1.84	15.5
Dust2	4	50%	1.21	18.0
Cache	3	0%	0.89	12.3
Mirage	2	0%	0.75	12.0
Nuke	2	50%	1.44	17.5
Ancient	1	0%	0.88	14.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.4%Headshot accuracy

39.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.6%Spray accuracy

80.9%Counter-strafing

8.7°Preaim

605msReaction time

42.2%T opening success

26.2%CT opening success

0.40Enemies flashed / flash

5.8%Flash assists

9.31HE damage / grenade

4.88Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 11.3823% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4022 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.
CT opening duels 26.1909% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	15–15	0.00	7%	30 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.01	6%	29 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.08	17%	29 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.04	8%	29 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.03	22%	29 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.02	10%	29 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	8%	28 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.04	14%	28 Aug →
nuke	7–13	0.04	23%	28 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.10	16%	27 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.06	11%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.08	8%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.01	6%	26 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.01	13%	26 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.03	9%	26 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.01	11%	26 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.05	9%	26 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.11	9%	25 Aug →
anubis	7–13	0.08	18%	25 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.00	9%	25 Aug →
overpass	8–6	-0.02	9%	25 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.02	2%	25 Aug →
anubis	10–13	0.07	16%	25 Aug →
overpass	13–10	0.01	13%	24 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.08	11%	24 Aug →
overpass	7–2	-0.02	18%	24 Aug →
ancient	2–13	0.04	7%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.05	18%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.06	7%	24 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.04	7%	24 Aug →
ancient	8–0	0.01	0%	23 Aug →
overpass	5–13	0.03	41%	21 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.03	10%	21 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.01	9%	21 Aug →
vertigo	9–13	0.00	16%	21 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.00	14%	21 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.04	16%	20 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.02	8%	20 Aug →
dust2	4–13	0.10	21%	20 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.02	0%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.18	13%	18 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.09	17%	18 Aug →
nuke	6–13	0.05	8%	17 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.07	14%	17 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.10	22%	16 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.09	12%	15 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.07	8%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	15%	15 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.08	12%	14 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	16%	14 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.06	14%	14 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.08	4%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.15	14%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.18	3%	14 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.00	50%	13 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.05	15%	13 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.09	17%	12 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.05	24%	12 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.04	9%	11 Aug →
inferno	1–13	-0.07	7%	11 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.12	19%	10 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	21%	10 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.03	11%	9 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	13%	9 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.11	19%	9 Aug →
cache	12–12	-0.02	17%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.01	13%	8 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.02	10%	8 Aug →
ancient	15–15	-0.01	17%	8 Aug →
cache	5–13	0.01	20%	8 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.05	13%	7 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.04	12%	7 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.00	9%	7 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.06	29%	7 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.04	30%	7 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.01	23%	7 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.02	10%	7 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.04	9%	7 Aug →
ancient	2–13	-0.00	9%	3 Aug →
nuke	6–13	0.03	16%	2 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.06	6%	2 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.05	12%	2 Aug →
ancient	2–13	0.00	7%	2 Aug →
cache	13–16	0.01	11%	2 Aug →
anubis	16–13	0.11	13%	2 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.05	17%	1 Aug →
ancient	3–13	0.03	13%	1 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.16	15%	1 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.08	4%	1 Aug →
cache	7–4	0.03	15%	1 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.00	28%	1 Aug →
nuke	1–13	0.09	38%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.10	23%	31 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.06	16%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	15%	31 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.06	16%	31 Jul →
ancient	9–13	0.13	14%	31 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.01	21%	30 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.12	21%	30 Jul →
nuke	13–2	0.15	13%	30 Jul →