DrBroCode — CS2 Stats
76561199201888498[U:1:1241622770]
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=918), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 5 median | Level 6 median | vs Level 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 72.7% | 44.2% | 44.9% | above |
| Shot accuracy | 2.7% | 11.2% | 11.8% | 9.1% short |
| Kill/death ratio | 1.37 | 1.04 | 1.04 | above |
| Match win rate | 38.3% | 45.3% | 45.3% | 7.0% short |
This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.09 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.
Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match
Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.
Where you differ: lower aim profile.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Reaction time. 594ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 32 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 mirage | C | 10 | 4–6 | 40% | 0.01 |
 dust2 | S | 9 | 7–2 | 78% | 0.06 |
 inferno | D | 9 | 2–7 | 22% | 0.05 |
 nuke | — | 2 | 0–2 | 0% | -0.00 |
 ancient | — | 2 | 2–0 | 100% | 0.13 |
Across the last 32 tracked matches.
Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 3 | 33% | 1.10 | 18.3 |
| Inferno | 3 | 100% | 1.24 | 10.0 |
| Dust2 | 1 | 100% | 1.82 | 20.0 |
| Ancient | 1 | 100% | 1.00 | 8.0 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Grenades & UtilityGrenade Lineups →
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 3.7863 — below the 4 mark we flag
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 26.8607% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mirage | 5–13 | 0.12 | 15% | 7 Feb → | |
| mirage | 1–13 | -0.04 | 19% | 7 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 13–1 | 0.08 | 9% | 7 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 1–3 | 0.07 | 14% | 7 Feb → | |
| mirage | 2–13 | -0.08 | 10% | 6 Feb → | |
| nuke | 8–13 | 0.01 | 27% | 6 Feb → | |
| mirage | 12–12 | 0.00 | 16% | 5 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 13–5 | 0.01 | 14% | 5 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 13–6 | -0.02 | 26% | 4 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 2–13 | -0.02 | 25% | 4 Feb → | |
| inferno | 7–13 | 0.13 | 16% | 3 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 13–3 | 0.09 | 17% | 3 Feb → | |
| inferno | 7–13 | 0.23 | 22% | 3 Feb → | |
| inferno | 13–4 | 0.12 | 20% | 3 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–4 | 0.09 | 18% | 3 Feb → | |
| mirage | 0–11 | -0.07 | 24% | 3 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–9 | 0.03 | 24% | 1 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 13–6 | 0.18 | 30% | 1 Feb → | |
| inferno | 11–13 | 0.13 | 14% | 1 Feb → | |
| mirage | 7–0 | 0.09 | 20% | 1 Feb → | |
| inferno | 6–13 | -0.05 | 27% | 18 Jan → | |
| inferno | 10–13 | -0.02 | 19% | 12 Jan → | |
| inferno | 6–13 | -0.02 | 12% | 11 Jan → | |
| ancient | 13–5 | 0.15 | 20% | 11 Jan → | |
| mirage | 7–13 | 0.04 | 15% | 11 Jan → | |
| dust2 | 13–4 | 0.08 | 16% | 11 Jan → | |
| mirage | 13–7 | -0.03 | 15% | 20 Aug → | |
| nuke | 8–13 | -0.02 | 12% | 14 Aug → | |
| ancient | 13–4 | 0.11 | 11% | 28 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 13–2 | 0.07 | 15% | 27 Jul → | |
| inferno | 5–13 | -0.01 | 24% | 31 May → | |
| inferno | 13–6 | -0.07 | 33% | 22 Mar → |
Match data via Leetify.
