tricera

tricera — CS2 Stats

US76561199198530813[U:1:1238265085]Steam profile ↗

140Tracked matches62%Win rate2026Tracked since
268Hours in CS18Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.9 Developing
Premier CS Rating3,071Grey band · top ~87% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#41908 of 53789 tracked
WingmanSilver IV
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Grey band among CSDB-tracked players (n=369), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerGrey band medianLight Blue band medianvs Light Blue band
Headshot rate31.0%37.5%39.7%8.6% short
Shot accuracy0.1%4.5%6.7%6.6% short
Kill/death ratio0.800.820.910.11 short
Match win rate41.7%39.1%42.1%meets

This profile matches the typical Light Blue band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Light Blue band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtriceraPREMIER3,071 · Grey bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim45
Positioning62
Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51463Last 10051%Win rateTWLLWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.5
Aggression8.0
Utility3.4
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels3.9

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 676ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.5
Positioning6.2
Utility3.4
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact9.0

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time677ms−75ms
first ⅓ avg 752ms → last ⅓ avg 677ms
Headshot accuracy7.0%−3.2%
first ⅓ avg 10.2% → last ⅓ avg 7.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.24Best rating — mirage 13–3
131Biggest win — cache
6Longest win streak
123In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

officeBest map · 63% over 16anubisWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB179853%0.03
dust2C1771041%0.00
officeA1610663%0.01
infernoA127558%-0.01
mirageA95456%-0.00
anubisD92722%-0.02
trainA53260%-0.02
cache42250%0.03
overpass32167%0.06
vertigo32167%-0.01
ancient3030%-0.01
italy110100%0.03
poseidon110100%-0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

4,953Lifetime kills
0.80K/D
357Matches
41.7%Match win rate · Top 50% of Grey band
31.0%Headshot %
0.1%Shot accuracy
624MVPs
115Hours (in match)
437Bombs planted
53Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

795dust2
494office
405nuke
358inferno
206vertigo
176train
30italy
1assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

7.5%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.5%Spray accuracy
81.6%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
676msReaction time
43.2%T opening success
48.2%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
1.2%Flash assists
10.80HE damage / grenade
6.01Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 7.4618% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4093 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke12–120.053%30 Aug
office13–80.076%29 Aug
mirage10–13-0.047%29 Aug
train2–13-0.059%29 Aug
nuke13–10-0.047%28 Aug
italy13–40.0311%28 Aug
office13–110.043%28 Aug
dust213–70.0212%27 Aug
dust210–13-0.034%27 Aug
nuke3–130.1612%25 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0518%25 Aug
dust213–40.099%24 Aug
train5–3-0.030%23 Aug
office13–110.108%23 Aug
overpass13–4-0.006%22 Aug
vertigo13–20.0510%18 Aug
anubis5–11-0.0412%17 Aug
nuke5–9-0.090%17 Aug
inferno3–9-0.065%17 Aug
anubis5–13-0.129%16 Aug
ancient10–13-0.036%16 Aug
nuke13–30.122%15 Aug
train13–10-0.034%15 Aug
train13–100.067%15 Aug
overpass0–13-0.047%15 Aug
office13–30.017%15 Aug
nuke6–90.097%15 Aug
poseidon9–0-0.128%15 Aug
inferno5–9-0.083%15 Aug
cache13–10.128%15 Aug
nuke11–13-0.054%15 Aug
inferno8–00.1114%15 Aug
office13–9-0.016%15 Aug
dust213–160.0412%14 Aug
dust213–110.015%14 Aug
mirage2–130.024%14 Aug
anubis7–130.034%14 Aug
anubis7–12-0.033%14 Aug
mirage13–30.249%14 Aug
ancient10–13-0.017%14 Aug
dust213–60.039%14 Aug
dust29–13-0.039%14 Aug
nuke11–130.055%14 Aug
office13–6-0.020%13 Aug
nuke1–130.063%13 Aug
dust22–13-0.069%13 Aug
nuke13–20.186%13 Aug
ancient9–130.027%13 Aug
anubis10–13-0.044%13 Aug
overpass9–40.237%13 Aug
dust29–13-0.007%13 Aug
office13–11-0.017%13 Aug
train5–13-0.023%13 Aug
vertigo13–8-0.047%11 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0312%11 Aug
anubis10–130.045%10 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0813%10 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0614%10 Aug
inferno2–9-0.110%10 Aug
mirage13–110.017%4 Aug
dust29–90.0713%4 Aug
anubis0–11-0.050%2 Aug
nuke13–100.0311%2 Aug
cache5–13-0.027%2 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0211%29 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0914%29 Jul
vertigo4–13-0.049%29 Jul
cache2–13-0.0029%28 Jul
dust22–13-0.088%28 Jul
mirage13–8-0.085%28 Jul
nuke13–11-0.078%26 Jul
office1–13-0.118%26 Jul
anubis13–40.038%23 Jul
office8–13-0.0516%22 Jul
office13–80.057%22 Jul
dust22–13-0.0420%22 Jul
dust20–13-0.0510%18 Jul
nuke13–100.0412%18 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0714%17 Jul
office6–13-0.046%17 Jul
nuke13–90.1412%17 Jul
office13–70.0311%16 Jul
office12–120.0210%15 Jul
office2–13-0.058%15 Jul
mirage13–40.048%15 Jul
dust29–130.0113%15 Jul
inferno13–80.0110%15 Jul
cache13–70.0310%14 Jul
nuke13–110.007%14 Jul
mirage1–13-0.073%13 Jul
anubis13–40.0213%12 Jul
dust213–110.047%12 Jul
office12–120.026%12 Jul
inferno9–130.0315%11 Jul
office13–70.0412%10 Jul
dust213–5-0.0211%10 Jul
dust213–110.048%10 Jul
inferno9–4-0.0410%9 Jul
inferno9–20.122%9 Jul
inferno9–20.1010%9 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →