Louisiana Purchase — CS2 Stats

76561199187721198[U:1:1227455470]✓ No bans

352Tracked matches47%Win rate2025Tracked since
679Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating13,206Blue band · top ~37.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#30113 of 45696 tracked
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,468), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate33.0%41.4%44.2%11.2% short
Shot accuracy0.0%9.0%11.6%11.6% short
Kill/death ratio0.930.971.030.10 short
Match win rate41.2%43.7%45.2%4.0% short

This profile sits below the typical Purple band player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLouisiana PurchasePREMIER13,206 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning52
Utility28

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46522Last 10046%Win rateWLWLLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.2
Aggression6.7
Utility2.8
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels3.9

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 613ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning5.2
Utility2.8
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time611ms−28ms
first ⅓ avg 639ms → last ⅓ avg 611ms
Headshot accuracy13.2%+3.3%
first ⅓ avg 9.8% → last ⅓ avg 13.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — vertigo 13–11
132Biggest win — nuke
6Longest win streak
79In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 64% over 11infernoWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC25101540%0.01
ancientC1761135%-0.00
nukeB168850%0.01
dust2A117464%0.03
cacheA116555%0.03
infernoD71614%-0.06
overpassB63350%0.04
anubis440100%0.00
debris1010%-0.03
office1010%0.05
vertigo110100%0.16

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

15,269Lifetime kills
0.93K/D
886Matches
41.2%Match win rate
33.0%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
1,956MVPs
263Hours (in match)
442Bombs planted
166Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,524dust2
1,044inferno
759nuke
216vertigo
197train
84office
13italy
3ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.2%Headshot accuracy
34.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.5%Spray accuracy
82.5%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
613msReaction time
39.3%T opening success
51.8%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
3.9%Flash assists
7.42HE damage / grenade
3.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.2074% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.4066 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.3173% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–30.0922%28 Aug
ancient8–130.0512%27 Aug
nuke13–30.0427%27 Aug
dust211–13-0.0218%14 Aug
ancient8–130.0218%4 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0312%2 Aug
mirage9–13-0.038%31 Jul
cache5–13-0.019%25 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0414%25 Jul
ancient2–13-0.106%22 Jul
dust211–130.0121%22 Jul
mirage13–50.0914%22 Jul
cache10–130.0018%22 Jul
dust213–100.0414%22 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0610%21 Jul
cache16–120.0310%21 Jul
ancient16–130.0613%16 Jul
cache13–40.1315%16 Jul
ancient14–160.018%13 Jul
cache5–13-0.0714%13 Jul
cache13–100.118%12 Jul
anubis13–110.0314%12 Jul
mirage6–130.0212%11 Jul
inferno1–9-0.207%10 Jul
debris8–8-0.0315%10 Jul
ancient13–110.029%10 Jul
office6–130.0515%10 Jul
vertigo13–110.1615%8 Jul
cache11–130.0813%7 Jul
cache13–80.0416%7 Jul
cache3–13-0.059%5 Jul
nuke13–20.018%5 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0213%3 Jul
anubis16–13-0.0512%3 Jul
dust213–90.0216%3 Jul
inferno9–60.0623%3 Jul
overpass11–130.0611%2 Jul
ancient1–13-0.0514%2 Jul
mirage8–13-0.026%2 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0212%1 Jul
inferno6–13-0.075%29 Jun
inferno2–130.0118%28 Jun
ancient13–50.0910%28 Jun
mirage8–130.0119%28 Jun
cache13–90.1015%24 Jun
nuke7–130.0115%24 Jun
anubis13–60.0119%21 Jun
mirage10–130.0217%21 Jun
mirage1–8-0.047%21 Jun
dust216–120.0311%20 Jun
overpass9–13-0.027%20 Jun
mirage9–13-0.028%19 Jun
ancient13–7-0.048%19 Jun
ancient4–13-0.0315%19 Jun
mirage10–130.063%19 Jun
nuke10–130.0614%19 Jun
nuke13–80.0119%19 Jun
inferno3–9-0.210%18 Jun
mirage9–130.007%17 Jun
overpass13–40.099%17 Jun
dust211–13-0.0310%15 Jun
nuke13–50.0613%15 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0121%15 Jun
dust213–100.0510%12 Jun
mirage13–70.034%11 Jun
mirage13–100.047%11 Jun
nuke13–6-0.036%11 Jun
dust213–7-0.0118%11 Jun
overpass5–13-0.0017%11 Jun
mirage13–110.038%11 Jun
dust211–130.0112%11 Jun
inferno8–13-0.028%10 Jun
mirage13–30.1112%9 Jun
nuke6–130.0116%9 Jun
nuke9–130.079%8 Jun
ancient6–13-0.098%8 Jun
overpass13–40.037%8 Jun
mirage13–50.032%7 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0310%7 Jun
mirage13–90.068%1 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0015%1 Jun
mirage6–13-0.029%27 May
ancient13–50.0411%26 May
mirage13–100.0211%25 May
mirage16–14-0.0213%21 May
mirage13–100.0210%20 May
nuke16–14-0.0113%20 May
dust213–30.1314%20 May
ancient15–150.018%18 May
overpass13–50.0812%18 May
nuke8–13-0.0510%18 May
ancient7–130.044%18 May
inferno14–160.018%18 May
mirage3–13-0.014%17 May
nuke10–130.0710%17 May
mirage8–130.026%17 May
cache13–10-0.0111%13 May
ancient5–13-0.045%13 May
anubis16–140.035%13 May
nuke13–90.049%12 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →