Prince Felix

Prince Felix — CS2 Stats

NL76561199182980009[U:1:1222714281]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

75Tracked matches72%Win rate2026Tracked since
449Hours in CS100Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.6 StrongAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating16,347Purple band · top ~23% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#12027 of 20099 tracked
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=201), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate48.4%48.1%meets
Shot accuracy0.0%12.9%12.9% short
Kill/death ratio1.441.08above
Match win rate56.2%46.5%above

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPrince FelixPREMIER16,347 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim94
Positioning60
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT46245Last 7561%Win rateWWWLWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.4
Aggression8.0
Utility4.7
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels4.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 94 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 94% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.4
Positioning6.0
Utility4.7
Mechanics9.7
Opening Duels4.0
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.6/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.07+0.08
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.07
Reaction time528ms−192ms
first ⅓ avg 720ms → last ⅓ avg 528ms
Headshot accuracy20.0%+4.9%
first ⅓ avg 15.1% → last ⅓ avg 20.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 75 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — anubis 13–6
131Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
64In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 86% over 7infernoWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA148657%-0.01
nukeA148657%0.05
dust2S139469%0.03
cacheA85363%0.01
infernoC83538%-0.01
ancientS76186%0.05
anubisC52340%0.08
debris440100%0.09
overpass21150%-0.05

Across the last 75 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

8,776Lifetime kills
1.44K/D · Top 10% of tracked players
457Matches
56.2%Match win rate · Top 5% of tracked players
48.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
0.0%Shot accuracy
1,623MVPs
131Hours (in match)
308Bombs planted
96Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

667inferno
604dust2
563nuke
49vertigo
4train
1ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.2%Headshot accuracy
43.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
93.8%Counter-strafing
7.1°Preaim
536msReaction time
36.2%T opening success
56.1%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
13.8%Flash assists
8.29HE damage / grenade
4.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4798 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.1543% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–60.0610%27 Aug
debris9–20.0617%26 Aug
cache13–30.0329%26 Aug
dust25–60.0119%25 Aug
debris9–50.0916%24 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0619%24 Aug
dust213–100.0215%23 Aug
mirage13–30.1520%23 Aug
nuke13–100.1117%22 Aug
cache3–30.0832%22 Aug
anubis4–130.1021%21 Aug
inferno13–70.0516%20 Aug
dust213–80.0524%20 Aug
anubis7–130.0329%20 Aug
mirage13–110.1120%16 Aug
dust213–80.0619%16 Aug
anubis10–130.0418%16 Aug
nuke13–50.1316%16 Aug
dust213–110.0920%16 Aug
nuke13–110.1114%15 Aug
mirage13–10.078%5 Aug
anubis13–60.1723%5 Aug
ancient11–130.0820%29 Jul
dust216–130.0528%29 Jul
nuke13–80.0429%29 Jul
cache8–10.0645%29 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0113%28 Jul
nuke10–40.0522%28 Jul
cache13–80.0013%28 Jul
dust213–90.0621%28 Jul
nuke9–130.0718%28 Jul
cache15–150.0623%28 Jul
dust213–20.0620%28 Jul
mirage13–80.0628%28 Jul
inferno13–90.0321%28 Jul
nuke15–150.0018%26 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0114%24 Jul
debris9–30.0911%13 Jul
inferno15–150.0221%13 Jul
debris9–40.1111%12 Jul
inferno6–13-0.1011%9 Jul
mirage13–11-0.079%24 Jun
ancient11–1-0.015%23 Jun
nuke13–80.0412%23 Jun
nuke3–13-0.0315%23 Jun
dust213–4-0.0114%21 Jun
nuke12–12-0.0012%20 Jun
mirage7–13-0.039%20 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0513%20 Jun
ancient13–30.1518%20 Jun
inferno0–13-0.0911%19 Jun
ancient13–10.0223%19 Jun
dust215–150.0218%18 Jun
inferno13–4-0.0319%18 Jun
ancient13–40.049%18 Jun
nuke13–10.167%18 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0210%17 Jun
ancient13–30.1116%6 Jun
cache13–4-0.0135%30 May
nuke13–110.0518%20 May
dust27–13-0.0412%7 May
mirage11–130.0113%7 May
inferno10–130.0114%4 May
mirage4–13-0.128%4 May
cache7–13-0.0614%30 Apr
cache13–5-0.0521%29 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0613%28 Apr
dust21–13-0.0227%13 Apr
mirage5–13-0.079%1 Apr
anubis13–40.0513%1 Apr
mirage3–13-0.066%30 Mar
mirage13–40.0119%30 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0519%29 Mar
overpass13–9-0.0218%27 Mar
overpass7–13-0.085%23 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Aim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →