HIGH PING OG — CS2 Stats

76561199164564990[U:1:1204299262]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,399Tracked matches47%Win rate2021Tracked since

2,525Hours in CS15Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.6 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating21,392Top 50% of 44,590 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#17446 of 57316 tracked

FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,670), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 7 median	Level 8 median	vs Level 8
Headshot rate	46.6%	46.0%	47.0%	meets
Shot accuracy	10.1%	12.6%	12.8%	2.7% short
Kill/death ratio	0.95	1.06	1.07	0.12 short
Match win rate	46.0%	45.8%	46.4%	meets

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89

Positioning57

Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–50–4Last 10046%Win rateWWWWLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.9

Aggression9.2

Utility5.2

Positioning5.7

Opening Duels4.1

Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like sh1ro 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9

Positioning5.7

Utility5.2

Mechanics7.1

Opening Duels4.1

Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time538ms−6ms

first ⅓ avg 544ms → last ⅓ avg 538ms

Headshot accuracy20.5%−0.8%

first ⅓ avg 21.3% → last ⅓ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — inferno 13–2

13–2Biggest win — inferno

4Longest win streak

W4Current streak

5–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 9mirageWeakest map · 39% over 23

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	35	15–20	43%	0.02
mirage	C	23	9–14	39%	-0.00
inferno	B	21	11–10	52%	0.02
ancient	C	10	4–6	40%	0.01
anubis	S	9	6–3	67%	0.01
cache	—	2	1–1	50%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 23). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

69,214Lifetime kills

0.95K/D

3,898Matches

46.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players

46.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 7 players

10.1%Shot accuracy

8,930MVPs

1,643Hours (in match)

4,890Bombs planted

1,158Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4722,980

M4A4 / M4A1-S12,782

AWP7,166

Desert Eagle4,647

P2000 / USP-S4,292

Glock-183,107

MP92,734

Galil AR2,119

FAMAS1,726

MAC-101,465

Lifetime map wins

9,410dust2

9,333inferno

973nuke

785vertigo

248train

40office

27cbble

12italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

202Matches

52%Win rate

1.30Avg K/D

101.5ADR

37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

19%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	33	61%	1.59	21.9
Inferno	16	69%	1.77	19.1
Ancient	10	40%	1.19	17.5
Anubis	5	80%	1.56	23.2
Dust2	5	60%	1.37	15.2
Vertigo	4	100%	2.58	28.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.8%Headshot accuracy

38.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

44.9%Spray accuracy

81.9%Counter-strafing

7.5°Preaim

537msReaction time

31.8%T opening success

60.9%CT opening success

0.58Enemies flashed / flash

6.6%Flash assists

11.73HE damage / grenade

4.11Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 31.8325% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–4	0.09	43%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.02	23%	27 Aug →
anubis	16–12	-0.02	14%	26 Aug →
ancient	16–12	-0.02	39%	26 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	9%	26 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.05	12%	23 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.00	17%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–16	0.01	25%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.17	21%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.03	24%	20 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.03	32%	20 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.04	14%	20 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.03	14%	20 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.02	26%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.04	19%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.08	16%	20 Aug →
dust2	14–16	0.00	19%	20 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.05	11%	15 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	11%	15 Aug →
anubis	13–8	-0.02	5%	15 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.01	24%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.05	18%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.02	11%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.04	47%	13 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.00	17%	13 Aug →
dust2	4–13	0.02	14%	13 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.10	11%	7 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.02	18%	7 Aug →
anubis	13–6	-0.03	26%	3 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.02	21%	2 Aug →
anubis	15–15	-0.05	14%	2 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	20%	25 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.02	39%	23 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.02	18%	21 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	17%	21 Jul →
dust2	16–13	-0.01	29%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.04	47%	18 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.02	18%	16 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.01	23%	12 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.08	28%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.05	19%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–2	-0.02	39%	6 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	21%	6 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.01	29%	6 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.06	33%	5 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.01	20%	5 Jun →
dust2	12–16	-0.05	8%	31 May →
inferno	3–13	0.00	13%	25 May →
dust2	13–4	0.05	14%	23 May →
ancient	10–13	-0.02	11%	8 May →
cache	13–6	0.01	16%	6 May →
mirage	13–6	0.01	21%	29 Apr →
mirage	8–13	0.01	14%	28 Apr →
dust2	13–9	0.02	10%	25 Apr →
inferno	8–13	-0.01	29%	24 Apr →
mirage	13–10	0.04	12%	24 Apr →
mirage	6–13	0.01	14%	22 Apr →
anubis	6–13	0.04	21%	22 Apr →
dust2	13–5	0.04	15%	22 Apr →
ancient	15–15	-0.01	13%	22 Apr →
ancient	13–6	-0.01	19%	20 Apr →
mirage	7–13	0.03	29%	20 Apr →
anubis	7–13	0.02	20%	19 Apr →
inferno	13–5	0.03	31%	19 Apr →
dust2	5–13	-0.01	6%	19 Apr →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	27%	17 Apr →
dust2	13–8	0.03	23%	17 Apr →
ancient	11–3	0.09	18%	16 Apr →
dust2	9–13	0.08	16%	16 Apr →
dust2	4–13	0.02	19%	15 Apr →
mirage	13–11	0.05	18%	15 Apr →
inferno	6–13	0.08	27%	15 Apr →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	13%	15 Apr →
inferno	11–13	-0.04	17%	15 Apr →
dust2	13–5	0.06	11%	14 Apr →
mirage	13–5	0.02	14%	14 Apr →
anubis	13–11	0.02	16%	13 Apr →
dust2	15–15	0.04	21%	12 Apr →
dust2	7–13	0.02	43%	11 Apr →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	14%	11 Apr →
dust2	13–11	0.05	24%	10 Apr →
mirage	13–8	0.03	25%	6 Apr →
inferno	13–11	0.01	5%	5 Apr →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	29%	5 Apr →
inferno	16–12	0.05	22%	4 Apr →
inferno	11–13	-0.04	23%	4 Apr →
mirage	13–3	0.01	36%	3 Apr →
inferno	13–8	0.03	13%	3 Apr →
dust2	16–13	-0.05	9%	3 Apr →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	10%	3 Apr →
dust2	9–13	-0.00	25%	1 Apr →
mirage	5–13	-0.05	15%	1 Apr →
dust2	16–14	-0.00	17%	1 Apr →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	22%	31 Mar →
ancient	12–12	0.08	22%	31 Mar →
anubis	13–7	0.09	17%	31 Mar →
inferno	13–9	0.05	24%	31 Mar →
dust2	13–3	0.08	33%	31 Mar →
inferno	10–13	-0.05	38%	30 Mar →
inferno	13–4	0.05	47%	12 Mar →