frog with parkinsons #banMK

frog with parkinsons #banMK — CS2 Stats

76561199164479228[U:1:1204213500]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,968Tracked matches57%Win rate2021Tracked since
7,218Hours in CS23Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongAggressive Rifler
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim93
Positioning58
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54415Last 10054%Win rateWLWWWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.3
Aggression9.0
Utility5.0
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch5.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 93 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.3
Positioning5.8
Utility5.0
Mechanics9.0
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact7.2

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time514ms−69ms
first ⅓ avg 583ms → last ⅓ avg 514ms
Headshot accuracy20.5%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 20.2% → last ⅓ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — dust2 6–0
130Biggest win — vertigo
9Longest win streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 65% over 37dust2Weakest map · 43% over 44
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C44192543%0.02
vertigoS37241365%0.05
mirageA169756%0.01
cache21150%0.05
nuke110100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 44). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

67,315Lifetime kills
1.08K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
7,730Matches
45.7%Match win rate
39.0%Headshot %
16.1%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players
9,755MVPs
3,519Hours (in match)
2,993Bombs planted
942Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4726,284
AWP5,427
FAMAS1,368
MP91,138
Knife1,072

Lifetime map wins

15,838vertigo
5,261dust2
2,859inferno
2,142nuke
276train
9office
9lake
1italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

876Matches
52%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
95.1ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2560%2.1815.4
Mirage560%1.3815.0
Overpass10%1.1121.0
Cache1100%1.8815.0
Ancient1100%1.7124.0
Vertigo1100%2.6429.0
Anubis1100%0.9518.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy
41.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.2%Spray accuracy
90.5%Counter-strafing
7.5°Preaim
509msReaction time
36.6%T opening success
56.8%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
10.6%Flash assists
19.43HE damage / grenade
3.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.5588 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.5884% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 44 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–30.0720%28 Aug
mirage10–120.0117%27 Aug
dust213–8-0.0115%27 Aug
dust213–100.0121%27 Aug
vertigo13–90.1525%27 Aug
dust25–130.0029%26 Aug
vertigo13–10.1812%26 Aug
dust28–13-0.0232%26 Aug
dust22–130.0117%25 Aug
vertigo7–13-0.0720%25 Aug
dust26–00.2232%25 Aug
dust213–80.0130%25 Aug
mirage2–6-0.1122%24 Aug
dust28–13-0.0214%23 Aug
dust22–30.1911%23 Aug
dust213–11-0.0115%23 Aug
vertigo2–13-0.0121%23 Aug
dust210–60.0610%23 Aug
mirage13–90.0218%22 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0413%22 Aug
dust213–10-0.0229%22 Aug
dust25–13-0.0224%20 Aug
dust213–100.0735%20 Aug
vertigo2–5-0.020%20 Aug
dust26–00.1245%20 Aug
vertigo13–70.0822%20 Aug
vertigo10–130.0712%14 Aug
vertigo13–40.1526%14 Aug
vertigo13–20.1317%14 Aug
vertigo5–130.0017%13 Aug
vertigo13–70.1824%13 Aug
dust213–110.0316%13 Aug
vertigo11–130.0016%12 Aug
dust25–130.0016%12 Aug
dust26–130.0022%11 Aug
dust213–100.0115%11 Aug
vertigo12–12-0.0619%11 Aug
vertigo8–13-0.0228%11 Aug
dust29–13-0.0523%11 Aug
vertigo13–60.0911%11 Aug
dust28–13-0.0122%10 Aug
dust23–13-0.0621%10 Aug
vertigo13–00.1020%10 Aug
dust25–13-0.0321%9 Aug
mirage13–20.0413%9 Aug
dust22–13-0.0415%9 Aug
vertigo13–20.1417%7 Aug
dust24–13-0.0719%7 Aug
dust213–60.1420%6 Aug
dust213–20.0735%6 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0320%6 Aug
dust29–13-0.160%5 Aug
dust24–13-0.063%5 Aug
dust213–40.1114%5 Aug
dust213–70.0619%5 Aug
mirage12–00.176%5 Aug
mirage13–60.0724%5 Aug
mirage13–110.0522%5 Aug
vertigo13–20.0530%5 Aug
dust213–40.0914%5 Aug
dust213–40.109%5 Aug
mirage13–70.0312%5 Aug
dust211–130.0414%5 Aug
cache9–100.0319%4 Aug
vertigo10–13-0.0210%4 Aug
vertigo13–80.0017%4 Aug
vertigo13–60.0515%4 Aug
vertigo13–7-0.0223%4 Aug
dust213–20.1214%4 Aug
vertigo13–20.1418%4 Aug
vertigo13–60.0910%4 Aug
vertigo13–70.0819%4 Aug
vertigo11–130.0314%4 Aug
vertigo13–80.0630%3 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0219%3 Aug
vertigo13–40.027%3 Aug
mirage2–13-0.1310%3 Aug
cache11–60.0618%3 Aug
vertigo7–00.0816%3 Aug
dust25–13-0.0521%3 Aug
vertigo13–110.0619%3 Aug
dust212–120.0314%3 Aug
vertigo13–10.0612%3 Aug
vertigo13–110.0232%3 Aug
mirage12–120.0033%28 Jul
dust23–1-0.0650%28 Jul
nuke13–90.0326%27 Jul
vertigo2–8-0.0913%27 Jul
vertigo3–130.0224%26 Jul
dust25–13-0.0236%26 Jul
dust212–120.0013%26 Jul
dust22–50.0224%26 Jul
mirage7–130.0315%26 Jul
dust26–13-0.0617%26 Jul
vertigo1–13-0.0127%26 Jul
vertigo13–30.0816%26 Jul
dust22–13-0.0428%26 Jul
dust212–120.1021%26 Jul
mirage13–50.0217%26 Jul
vertigo13–10.1314%26 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →