renthal — CS2 Stats
FR76561199139459710[U:1:1179193982]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 10 median | vs Level 10 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 26.4% | 52.8% | 26.4% short |
| Shot accuracy | 10.2% | 13.7% | 3.5% short |
| Kill/death ratio | 2.26 | 1.08 | above |
| Match win rate | 50.9% | 49.2% | above |
This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Player DNA
Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.
Strong CT-side opener
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match
Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.
Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Reaction time. 575ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 87 | 55% | 1.23 | 16.0 |
| Dust2 | 54 | 61% | 1.22 | 16.9 |
| Anubis | 28 | 46% | 1.19 | 15.6 |
| Ancient | 22 | 27% | 0.99 | 14.3 |
| Nuke | 19 | 74% | 1.16 | 14.4 |
| Inferno | 15 | 60% | 1.24 | 14.3 |
| Cache | 10 | 60% | 1.58 | 23.3 |
| Vertigo | 6 | 50% | 1.44 | 14.2 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Grenades & UtilityGrenade Lineups →
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4305 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 18.9776% — below the 40% mark we flag