ERROR 606

ERROR 606 — CS2 Stats

76561199130989920[U:1:1170724192]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,095Tracked matches60%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,025Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.4 Developing
FaceitLevel 5 · 262 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGERROR 606FACEITLevel 5 · 262 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim49
Positioning45
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5149Last 10051%Win rateLWLLLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.9
Aggression4.6
Utility5.4
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 596ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.9
Positioning4.5
Utility5.4
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact8.3

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time597ms−37ms
first ⅓ avg 634ms → last ⅓ avg 597ms
Headshot accuracy17.6%+2.9%
first ⅓ avg 14.7% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.09Best rating — nuke 8–13
131Biggest win — mirage
8Longest win streak
1010In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 71% over 14infernoWeakest map · 14% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB36191753%-0.02
ancientS1611569%0.00
infernoD1421214%-0.05
dust2S1410471%-0.02
cacheD62433%-0.05
overpassC52340%-0.02
nuke42250%-0.01
anubis42250%-0.03
vertigo110100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

43,845Lifetime kills
0.82K/D
2,888Matches
41.0%Match win rate
42.1%Headshot %
10.6%Shot accuracy
8,476MVPs
1,025Hours (in match)
2,161Bombs planted
541Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4711,998
AWP6,430
MAC-101,479
MP91,446
Knife905

Lifetime map wins

5,448inferno
1,519dust2
977nuke
844vertigo
613cbble
349train
36lake
13office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

271Matches
47%Win rate
0.87Avg K/D
76.9ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage9555%0.9614.2
Ancient3447%0.9915.8
Overpass3148%0.8013.6
Dust22556%0.8214.0
Inferno2040%0.7812.9
Anubis1155%1.2214.9
Vertigo1030%0.588.4
Cache850%0.7613.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.0%Headshot accuracy
30.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
28.9%Spray accuracy
72.5%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
596msReaction time
27.2%T opening success
42.7%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
4.60HE damage / grenade
10.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.2424% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient11–130.0014%27 Aug
ancient13–30.0320%27 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0319%24 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0113%22 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0119%22 Aug
dust213–6-0.0511%22 Aug
ancient13–90.0113%22 Aug
mirage13–160.0212%22 Aug
mirage9–2-0.1425%20 Aug
mirage13–80.0013%20 Aug
mirage13–40.0322%20 Aug
mirage13–70.0828%18 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0110%18 Aug
dust29–13-0.0322%18 Aug
vertigo13–4-0.0423%16 Aug
dust213–5-0.0215%9 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0724%8 Aug
ancient13–110.0313%8 Aug
dust213–5-0.048%8 Aug
dust24–13-0.0410%8 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0426%2 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0613%2 Aug
mirage13–80.0713%2 Aug
dust222–200.0125%1 Aug
mirage13–110.0119%29 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0416%28 Jul
inferno3–9-0.1421%25 Jul
inferno7–90.0313%25 Jul
inferno5–90.0129%25 Jul
inferno2–9-0.1512%25 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0217%23 Jul
dust216–12-0.0313%12 Jul
dust27–13-0.0532%12 Jul
cache3–13-0.047%10 Jul
dust29–13-0.0410%10 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0514%10 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0513%10 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0617%8 Jul
mirage13–80.0512%8 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0315%8 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0510%7 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0316%7 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0216%7 Jul
overpass13–8-0.052%6 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0112%5 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0019%5 Jul
mirage17–19-0.0215%5 Jul
dust213–5-0.068%5 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0113%4 Jul
mirage16–14-0.074%4 Jul
ancient13–5-0.0112%30 Jun
anubis13–5-0.0215%30 Jun
overpass13–110.0015%30 Jun
anubis13–3-0.0021%30 Jun
dust213–10-0.0413%28 Jun
ancient13–70.0114%28 Jun
mirage13–90.019%28 Jun
ancient7–130.029%27 Jun
cache13–9-0.0322%27 Jun
inferno9–6-0.0421%24 Jun
inferno5–9-0.148%24 Jun
overpass11–13-0.0510%23 Jun
ancient9–130.058%22 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0223%22 Jun
ancient13–90.0321%22 Jun
cache7–13-0.0318%22 Jun
ancient14–16-0.0716%21 Jun
inferno6–13-0.035%17 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0711%17 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0518%16 Jun
mirage13–7-0.009%15 Jun
ancient19–160.0311%15 Jun
mirage13–10-0.028%15 Jun
nuke7–13-0.083%14 Jun
anubis2–13-0.0721%14 Jun
overpass9–130.0418%14 Jun
cache19–16-0.0412%14 Jun
cache6–13-0.0418%13 Jun
nuke13–80.0318%13 Jun
mirage13–1-0.035%11 Jun
mirage10–130.0027%11 Jun
dust213–10.0135%11 Jun
inferno13–4-0.0118%11 Jun
ancient9–13-0.075%9 May
mirage11–13-0.0311%3 May
overpass4–13-0.0218%3 May
dust213–90.0228%3 May
inferno6–13-0.030%3 May
ancient13–11-0.038%3 May
mirage7–13-0.0014%3 May
ancient13–11-0.0111%3 May
mirage7–13-0.0914%2 May
dust213–20.0217%2 May
mirage13–7-0.0530%30 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0222%30 Apr
nuke8–130.0919%29 Apr
cache5–13-0.099%29 Apr
ancient13–110.0022%28 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0421%28 Apr
mirage8–00.040%27 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →