Shoddy Rando — CS2 Stats

76561199109923423[U:1:1149657695]✓ No bans

6,134Tracked matches53%Win rate2021Tracked since

3,834Hours in CS

CSDB Rating6.3 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating22,616Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#2112 of 6992 tracked

FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanGold Nova Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66

Positioning58

Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–46–2Last 10052%Win rateLLWWWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6

Aggression7.3

Utility6.6

Positioning5.8

Opening Duels3.4

Clutch0.0

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 661ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6

Positioning5.8

Utility6.6

Mechanics7.6

Opening Duels3.4

Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time657ms−15ms

first ⅓ avg 672ms → last ⅓ avg 657ms

Headshot accuracy17.6%−2.6%

first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — nuke 13–5

13–3Biggest win — anubis

7Longest win streak

L2Current streak

10–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 61% over 18anubisWeakest map · 43% over 14

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	A	19	11–8	58%	-0.00
dust2	B	19	9–10	47%	-0.01
inferno	A	18	11–7	61%	-0.01
mirage	B	17	9–8	53%	-0.00
anubis	C	14	6–8	43%	-0.02
ancient	C	9	4–5	44%	-0.00
nuke	—	4	2–2	50%	0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

165,485Lifetime kills

1.03K/D

8,472Matches

45.6%Match win rate

43.1%Headshot %

10.6%Shot accuracy

21,767MVPs

3,834Hours (in match)

8,892Bombs planted

1,606Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4762,157

M4A4 / M4A1-S35,546

Desert Eagle10,551

P2000 / USP-S8,194

AWP7,924

Glock-187,384

Galil AR6,218

MP95,437

MAC-104,852

FAMAS3,190

Lifetime map wins

14,898inferno

14,783dust2

8,654nuke

5,398vertigo

651train

244office

118cbble

45lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

65Matches

38%Win rate

0.82Avg K/D

65.2ADR

39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Anubis	4	50%	0.98	12.8
Inferno	2	0%	0.46	6.5
Nuke	2	50%	0.58	8.0
Mirage	1	100%	1.00	11.0
Ancient	1	100%	0.94	15.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.0%Headshot accuracy

34.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.3%Spray accuracy

84.2%Counter-strafing

10.3°Preaim

661msReaction time

40.4%T opening success

46.7%CT opening success

0.71Enemies flashed / flash

11.5%Flash assists

10.02HE damage / grenade

9.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	4–13	0.03	12%	26 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.04	22%	24 Aug →
anubis	13–3	-0.00	19%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.02	26%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.00	32%	23 Aug →
ancient	4–13	0.03	16%	21 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.03	27%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.03	16%	18 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.02	22%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.01	21%	17 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.09	12%	17 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.00	18%	16 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.08	22%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.01	35%	16 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.01	14%	16 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	17%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.02	8%	15 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.07	9%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.02	19%	12 Aug →
ancient	7–13	0.02	19%	12 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.00	18%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.01	15%	12 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	12%	10 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.01	15%	8 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.03	17%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.01	22%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.00	18%	31 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.06	14%	30 Jul →
dust2	16–13	-0.02	12%	28 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.01	16%	28 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.02	21%	28 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.06	11%	28 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.01	7%	28 Jul →
cache	13–16	-0.06	10%	27 Jul →
cache	13–6	-0.03	18%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.02	12%	26 Jul →
ancient	1–13	-0.11	0%	26 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.05	23%	26 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.02	21%	26 Jul →
inferno	16–14	-0.03	21%	25 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.06	20%	25 Jul →
anubis	15–15	-0.01	19%	25 Jul →
cache	16–14	0.01	18%	25 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.04	19%	25 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.09	18%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.05	18%	25 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.03	13%	24 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.02	19%	24 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.03	23%	23 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.04	12%	23 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.03	18%	23 Jul →
inferno	13–6	-0.05	28%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.06	9%	23 Jul →
anubis	15–15	-0.01	14%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.00	16%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.04	15%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.05	28%	22 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.09	13%	22 Jul →
dust2	0–13	-0.06	21%	21 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.07	22%	21 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.00	17%	20 Jul →
inferno	12–16	-0.01	15%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.04	23%	20 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	26%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.03	20%	20 Jul →
dust2	16–14	-0.01	17%	19 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.02	20%	18 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.10	17%	18 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.08	24%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.02	29%	18 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.00	19%	16 Jul →
anubis	12–16	-0.09	13%	16 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.05	26%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.06	9%	16 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.02	30%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.07	22%	16 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.11	15%	15 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.01	24%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.06	14%	15 Jul →
cache	2–13	-0.08	9%	15 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.01	31%	15 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.00	18%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.04	25%	14 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.02	14%	14 Jul →
inferno	13–4	-0.03	18%	14 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.02	23%	14 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.07	18%	14 Jul →
nuke	14–16	0.02	22%	14 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	29%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–6	-0.00	21%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	11%	13 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	20%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–16	0.01	29%	13 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.06	11%	13 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.05	18%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.05	23%	13 Jul →
mirage	5–13	0.04	20%	13 Jul →
cache	14–16	-0.02	19%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.00	25%	13 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.11	24%	13 Jul →