DeMangusta — CS2 Stats

76561199106580194[U:1:1146314466]

1,288Tracked matches54%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,764Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating18,252Purple band · top ~15.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#12744 of 24823 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,386 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,022), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate41.2%46.2%47.2%6.0% short
Shot accuracy4.9%12.5%12.3%7.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.921.061.070.15 short
Match win rate38.9%45.9%46.3%7.5% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 8 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDeMangustaFACEITLevel 7 · 1,386 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER18,252 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning45
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48457Last 10048%Win rateTTTTLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.8
Aggression4.2
Utility6.8
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 607ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning4.5
Utility6.8
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact6.3

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time612ms−48ms
first ⅓ avg 660ms → last ⅓ avg 612ms
Headshot accuracy16.6%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 15.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.29Best rating — nuke 9–0
131Biggest win — mirage
8Longest win streak
38In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 60% over 10infernoWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C1981142%0.00
nukeB189950%0.05
cacheC1771041%-0.00
mirageB126650%0.00
anubisA106460%0.01
ancientA95456%0.04
infernoD93633%-0.02
overpass330100%0.03
vertigo21150%0.01
poseidon1010%-0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

84,509Lifetime kills
0.92K/D
5,218Matches
38.9%Match win rate
41.2%Headshot %
4.9%Shot accuracy
8,737MVPs
1,764Hours (in match)
4,659Bombs planted
1,004Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4725,815
AWP7,133
MP94,156
MAC-103,038
FAMAS1,925

Lifetime map wins

7,206dust2
6,055inferno
4,856nuke
2,715vertigo
859train
806office
190italy
150lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,155Matches
49%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
80.3ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage29148%1.0615.3
Dust222649%1.1816.8
Ancient16038%0.9214.3
Inferno15749%1.1015.4
Anubis11653%1.1616.6
Nuke10159%1.2217.4
Vertigo3954%1.2617.5
Overpass2744%0.9613.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.8%Headshot accuracy
37.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.2%Spray accuracy
77.4%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
607msReaction time
21.1%T opening success
45.3%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
9.8%Flash assists
9.92HE damage / grenade
15.76Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.1012% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient15–150.0313%22 Aug
dust215–15-0.0415%22 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0317%21 Aug
dust215–15-0.0322%20 Aug
cache5–13-0.0214%18 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0817%18 Aug
nuke8–130.0319%17 Aug
nuke11–130.0510%17 Aug
nuke13–80.0217%16 Aug
dust26–13-0.0416%16 Aug
nuke13–90.045%16 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0319%15 Aug
nuke13–30.0315%15 Aug
inferno8–8-0.0514%14 Aug
poseidon7–9-0.0923%14 Aug
ancient13–110.0011%14 Aug
dust28–130.0030%14 Aug
cache13–70.0317%13 Aug
cache9–130.0622%12 Aug
nuke13–80.0626%10 Aug
nuke6–130.0113%8 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0514%25 Jul
dust25–13-0.0622%25 Jul
cache16–14-0.028%25 Jul
nuke13–30.0312%24 Jul
dust213–90.0631%24 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0619%24 Jul
ancient13–30.1314%24 Jul
dust213–6-0.0225%24 Jul
mirage13–11-0.015%24 Jul
anubis13–9-0.032%24 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0014%21 Jul
mirage13–10.2230%21 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0117%21 Jul
dust213–70.0216%21 Jul
cache11–13-0.063%20 Jul
inferno13–90.0011%20 Jul
ancient13–80.0516%19 Jul
mirage15–150.0022%19 Jul
cache13–70.0217%19 Jul
dust213–10.0616%19 Jul
inferno4–13-0.035%17 Jul
dust213–100.049%17 Jul
dust213–80.1127%16 Jul
cache6–13-0.065%16 Jul
cache11–130.0410%16 Jul
cache10–13-0.0215%16 Jul
nuke13–50.0612%14 Jul
ancient13–70.0519%14 Jul
ancient9–130.0215%9 Jul
cache10–13-0.0517%7 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0126%6 Jul
nuke13–100.0614%6 Jul
cache13–100.0017%5 Jul
cache13–90.0610%5 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0114%1 Jul
overpass13–90.0522%29 Jun
dust211–13-0.0123%29 Jun
dust29–13-0.0512%28 Jun
nuke9–00.2926%28 Jun
anubis13–50.1010%28 Jun
dust27–130.0426%28 Jun
ancient13–70.1021%27 Jun
mirage13–16-0.0116%20 Jun
mirage13–80.0217%14 Jun
dust210–130.0221%13 Jun
anubis13–7-0.0215%11 Jun
cache3–13-0.0515%6 Jun
cache13–10.0914%4 Jun
dust211–13-0.095%3 Jun
vertigo2–13-0.0413%3 Jun
vertigo13–50.0623%3 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0533%31 May
ancient5–13-0.0417%29 May
overpass13–100.0114%29 May
ancient11–13-0.019%25 May
anubis10–130.0311%25 May
dust215–150.0314%19 May
nuke9–130.0812%18 May
overpass13–60.0433%18 May
inferno6–13-0.0313%16 May
dust213–100.0016%16 May
nuke7–13-0.0114%9 May
anubis13–8-0.0114%9 May
cache8–13-0.0626%9 May
mirage13–40.0233%9 May
cache13–100.0314%5 May
inferno9–13-0.069%5 May
mirage6–13-0.039%3 May
nuke12–16-0.058%3 May
anubis4–130.0117%29 Apr
nuke13–90.1013%29 Apr
cache9–13-0.0118%29 Apr
inferno13–60.1119%26 Apr
anubis11–130.0020%25 Apr
mirage13–8-0.038%24 Apr
dust216–130.0415%24 Apr
anubis13–30.0314%24 Apr
nuke8–130.0310%23 Apr
anubis13–50.0514%22 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →