Tmxx- — CS2 Stats

CZ76561199105618470[U:1:1145352742]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

545Tracked matches34%Win rate2021Tracked since

2,170Hours in CS43Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.7 SolidEntry Fragger

FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,022), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 7 median	Level 8 median	vs Level 8
Headshot rate	54.8%	46.2%	47.2%	above
Shot accuracy	8.4%	12.5%	12.3%	3.9% short
Kill/death ratio	0.97	1.06	1.07	0.11 short
Match win rate	49.3%	45.9%	46.3%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89

Positioning72

Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49–46–5Last 10049%Win rateLLLLLWTLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry Fragger — High opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim8.9

Aggression10.0

Utility3.9

Positioning7.2

Opening Duels6.8

Clutch6.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like s1mple 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 67% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 67% on CT to 48% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9

Positioning7.2

Utility3.9

Mechanics8.6

Opening Duels6.8

Win Impact0.0

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.05

Reaction time543ms−84ms

first ⅓ avg 626ms → last ⅓ avg 543ms

Headshot accuracy20.8%+2.3%

first ⅓ avg 18.5% → last ⅓ avg 20.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — inferno 13–7

13–1Biggest win — mirage

6Longest win streak

L5Current streak

4–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

3Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 61% over 28overpassWeakest map · 20% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	39	20–19	51%	0.04
cache	A	28	17–11	61%	0.04
inferno	B	11	5–6	45%	0.09
anubis	C	7	3–4	43%	0.07
dust2	D	6	2–4	33%	0.05
overpass	D	5	1–4	20%	0.06
train	—	1	1–0	100%	0.12
nuke	—	1	0–1	0%	0.07
ancient	—	1	0–1	0%	0.12
poseidon	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

58,435Lifetime kills

0.97K/D

1,817Matches

49.3%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 7 players

54.8%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 7 players

8.4%Shot accuracy

6,364MVPs

2,289Hours (in match)

707Bombs planted

471Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4729,669

M4A4 / M4A1-S8,335

AWP5,409

P2000 / USP-S3,541

Desert Eagle3,383

Glock-182,047

MP91,170

Galil AR1,039

MAC-10811

FAMAS798

Lifetime map wins

4,632inferno

1,450dust2

799nuke

707train

285vertigo

171cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

176Matches

55%Win rate

1.38Avg K/D

79.5ADR

44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win

50%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	27	56%	1.28	18.5
Anubis	17	47%	1.30	19.2
Inferno	16	75%	1.63	20.8
Ancient	7	29%	1.23	21.3
Dust2	6	100%	1.03	15.0
Vertigo	3	33%	1.22	15.3
Nuke	2	50%	1.52	23.0
Overpass	1	0%	1.05	23.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.4%Headshot accuracy

40.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.5%Spray accuracy

88.6%Counter-strafing

7.8°Preaim

541msReaction time

47.6%T opening success

67.0%CT opening success

0.59Enemies flashed / flash

5.9%Flash assists

8.20HE damage / grenade

4.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategy →Overpass grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	7–13	-0.09	9%	28 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.01	24%	27 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.14	17%	27 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.03	20%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–16	0.00	27%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.07	11%	25 Aug →
cache	12–12	0.18	19%	25 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.06	33%	25 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.05	6%	24 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.14	18%	24 Aug →
dust2	4–13	0.02	25%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.05	11%	24 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.07	23%	23 Aug →
overpass	4–9	-0.02	21%	23 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.06	13%	23 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.02	28%	23 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.00	17%	21 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.02	13%	21 Aug →
mirage	3–13	0.00	24%	21 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.16	24%	21 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.17	29%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.09	30%	20 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	23%	20 Aug →
inferno	4–13	0.06	35%	18 Aug →
inferno	4–0	0.09	26%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.13	23%	18 Aug →
overpass	2–13	0.05	14%	18 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.03	15%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.04	16%	18 Aug →
train	13–10	0.12	18%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.03	18%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.08	24%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.06	33%	17 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.02	22%	16 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.07	17%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.03	13%	12 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.12	21%	12 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.10	15%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.13	18%	12 Aug →
mirage	10–0	0.19	19%	12 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.11	19%	12 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.20	30%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.06	19%	10 Aug →
mirage	4–0	0.18	27%	10 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.16	19%	9 Aug →
mirage	1–6	0.11	26%	9 Aug →
inferno	9–5	0.09	20%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.07	23%	8 Aug →
cache	13–5	-0.03	13%	8 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.01	20%	6 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.01	18%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.04	24%	5 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.04	27%	3 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.08	24%	3 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.01	19%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.06	18%	31 Jul →
cache	1–13	-0.07	42%	31 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.04	23%	30 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.02	19%	28 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	30%	28 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.04	21%	28 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.16	13%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	14%	26 Jul →
poseidon	6–9	-0.02	29%	26 Jul →
overpass	7–9	0.09	28%	26 Jul →
dust2	2–13	0.02	22%	26 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.03	11%	26 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.06	19%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.05	12%	25 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.06	12%	23 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.03	27%	23 Jul →
dust2	14–16	0.07	22%	23 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.04	14%	22 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.02	24%	22 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.08	35%	21 Jul →
anubis	13–16	0.01	11%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.01	25%	20 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	25%	16 Jul →
mirage	1–7	-0.03	13%	16 Jul →
cache	6–1	-0.07	18%	16 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.01	21%	16 Jul →
overpass	13–8	0.10	21%	8 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.08	17%	8 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.07	21%	8 Jul →
anubis	12–12	0.16	30%	6 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.14	19%	6 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.02	25%	6 Jul →
cache	2–13	-0.04	14%	6 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.02	16%	2 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.03	26%	2 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.12	11%	2 Jul →
cache	13–7	-0.02	5%	28 Jun →
mirage	9–13	0.02	9%	28 Jun →
mirage	4–13	-0.07	6%	28 Jun →
mirage	11–13	0.05	14%	27 Jun →
cache	8–13	0.09	22%	25 Jun →
mirage	13–2	0.10	14%	25 Jun →
inferno	3–13	-0.02	13%	25 Jun →
inferno	13–9	0.09	26%	23 Jun →
overpass	12–12	0.08	25%	23 Jun →

Show all 100 matchesShow fewer

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

Explore CSDB.gg

Sensitivity ConverterConvert sensitivity between CS2 and other games eDPI CalculatorCalculate your effective DPI cm/360 CalculatorMouse distance per full turn Resolution CalculatorCompare aspect ratios and resolutions Crosshair GeneratorBuild and preview custom crosshairs

Tools

Sticker Craft MakerPlan and price a CS2 sticker craft with live prices on every piece CS2 Stats TrackerLook up any player: Premier rating, Faceit level, matches and skill breakdown Trust Factor CheckerEstimate your CS2 Trust Factor from the signals Valve has acknowledged

Learn & Explore

Most Traded CS2 SkinsRanked by completed sales — transaction data, not listings Cheapest Knives in CS2Every knife type ranked by its cheapest live price Cheapest Gloves in CS2Every glove model ranked by its cheapest live price