Tanzende Katze

Tanzende Katze — CS2 Stats

DE76561199101660763[U:1:1141395035]Steam profile ↗

73Tracked matches29%Win rate2024Tracked since
131Hours in CS
CSDB Rating2.5 Learning
Premier CS Rating1,010Grey band · top ~95.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#39556 of 50418 tracked
WingmanSilver I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Grey band among CSDB-tracked players (n=369), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerGrey band medianLight Blue band medianvs Light Blue band
Headshot rate42.8%37.5%39.7%above
Shot accuracy0.9%4.5%6.7%5.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.720.820.910.19 short
Match win rate36.1%39.1%42.1%6.0% short

This profile matches the typical Light Blue band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Light Blue band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTanzende KatzePREMIER1,010 · Grey bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim25
Positioning48
Utility2

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY24436Last 7333%Win rateLLWLWTWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim2.5
Aggression4.3
Utility0.2
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.1

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 65% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 880ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim2.5
Positioning4.8
Utility0.2
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact0.0

Composite 2.5/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.05 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time886ms+26ms
first ⅓ avg 861ms → last ⅓ avg 886ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%+3.9%
first ⅓ avg 12.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 73 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.29Best rating — nuke 9–0
132Biggest win — nuke
3Longest win streak
L2Current streak
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 47% over 17infernoWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D2461825%-0.03
nukeB178947%-0.02
mirageC1771041%-0.04
infernoD92722%-0.04
anubis21150%-0.10
vertigo2020%-0.12
ancient1010%-0.05
cache1010%-0.09

Across the last 73 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

6,213Lifetime kills
0.72K/D
518Matches
36.1%Match win rate
42.8%Headshot % · Top 25% of Grey band
0.9%Shot accuracy
783MVPs
131Hours (in match)
410Bombs planted
79Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,144dust2
607nuke
272inferno
102vertigo
23train
7ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.6%Headshot accuracy
32.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
28.4%Spray accuracy
78.1%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
880msReaction time
35.1%T opening success
33.7%CT opening success
0.00Enemies flashed / flash
0.0%Flash assists
4.50HE damage / grenade
0.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 880.4167ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.0611% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke8–13-0.0812%17 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0510%17 Jul
mirage13–6-0.1318%17 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0922%17 Jul
nuke12–3-0.013%17 Jul
nuke8–8-0.1319%17 Jul
nuke9–10.2432%17 Jul
nuke8–130.0219%17 Jul
nuke9–00.296%17 Jul
mirage1–13-0.1012%17 Jul
dust210–13-0.0710%16 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0312%16 Jul
dust211–13-0.0715%16 Jul
dust21–13-0.0425%16 Jul
mirage2–13-0.107%16 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0613%16 Jul
dust213–100.0811%16 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0212%16 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0630%16 Jul
mirage0–13-0.0918%16 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0623%16 Jul
dust210–13-0.0422%16 Jul
mirage12–120.0419%16 Jul
dust28–13-0.0317%15 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0314%15 Jul
dust213–70.0816%15 Jul
dust22–13-0.094%15 Jul
dust215–15-0.0011%15 Jul
dust28–13-0.0914%15 Jul
anubis16–12-0.1013%15 Jul
nuke6–9-0.1419%15 Jul
nuke1–9-0.2113%15 Jul
mirage9–130.0226%14 Jul
dust213–40.0514%14 Jul
dust210–13-0.0819%14 Jul
nuke3–9-0.0824%14 Jul
dust25–130.089%14 Jul
inferno10–130.0616%14 Jul
mirage10–130.0512%14 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0715%14 Jul
dust22–13-0.059%14 Jul
mirage12–120.0118%14 Jul
inferno2–9-0.049%14 Jul
nuke0–8-0.0329%13 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0315%13 Jul
dust213–11-0.0418%13 Jul
cache4–13-0.0910%13 Jul
dust213–80.0310%13 Jul
nuke13–2-0.0211%13 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0513%13 Jul
dust29–13-0.0619%11 Jul
mirage3–13-0.1116%10 Jul
mirage13–7-0.046%9 Jul
nuke9–40.036%9 Jul
dust22–13-0.056%9 Jul
inferno5–13-0.087%7 Jul
dust24–13-0.066%7 Jul
nuke9–5-0.1018%7 Jul
dust29–13-0.0610%4 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0310%4 Jul
mirage12–12-0.0124%4 Jul
inferno13–2-0.059%4 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0711%28 Jun
dust23–13-0.1014%27 Jun
mirage9–13-0.087%21 Jun
vertigo12–12-0.079%21 Jun
mirage13–20.039%18 Jun
dust213–10-0.0311%22 Jul
dust26–13-0.060%18 Jul
mirage16–14-0.019%17 Jul
nuke9–40.0619%13 Jul
dust20–13-0.0838%5 Jul
vertigo4–13-0.1620%9 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →