Fih — CS2 Stats
US76561199099288437[U:1:1139022709]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,146), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 8 median | Level 9 median | vs Level 9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 56.4% | 47.2% | 49.0% | above |
| Shot accuracy | 13.8% | 12.3% | 13.1% | above |
| Kill/death ratio | 0.88 | 1.07 | 1.08 | 0.20 short |
| Match win rate | 44.3% | 46.3% | 46.9% | 2.7% short |
This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.
Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match
Plays most like ropz 89% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.
Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.
Areas to improve
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Reaction time. 583ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 mirage | A | 50 | 32–18 | 64% | 0.04 |
| office | A | 24 | 14–10 | 58% | 0.04 |
 dust2 | A | 12 | 7–5 | 58% | 0.02 |
 nuke | D | 5 | 1–4 | 20% | 0.01 |
 inferno | — | 4 | 2–2 | 50% | 0.09 |
 overpass | — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | 0.09 |
 anubis | — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | 0.07 |
 train | — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | -0.03 |
 vertigo | — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | 0.13 |
| palacio | — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | -0.01 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 25.2312% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mirage | 13–11 | 0.04 | 19% | 22 May → | |
| mirage | 13–8 | 0.03 | 41% | 22 May → | |
| mirage | 7–13 | 0.01 | 26% | 28 Mar → | |
| office | 10–13 | 0.01 | 40% | 28 Mar → | |
| mirage | 13–2 | 0.02 | 31% | 27 Mar → | |
| dust2 | 13–1 | 0.10 | 32% | 27 Mar → | |
| mirage | 13–2 | -0.01 | 31% | 27 Mar → | |
| nuke | 8–8 | -0.08 | 29% | 27 Mar → | |
| office | 6–13 | 0.08 | 44% | 27 Mar → | |
| mirage | 13–9 | 0.03 | 34% | 25 Mar → | |
| mirage | 10–13 | 0.03 | 22% | 28 Feb → | |
| mirage | 7–13 | 0.01 | 14% | 28 Feb → | |
| mirage | 5–0 | 0.01 | 44% | 28 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 4–13 | -0.01 | 19% | 28 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–4 | 0.09 | 18% | 28 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–4 | 0.07 | 18% | 28 Feb → | |
| office | 13–8 | -0.02 | 52% | 27 Feb → | |
| office | 9–13 | 0.05 | 43% | 27 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–9 | 0.06 | 32% | 27 Feb → | |
| mirage | 11–13 | 0.01 | 35% | 15 Feb → | |
| overpass | 13–1 | 0.09 | 27% | 14 Feb → | |
| anubis | 6–13 | 0.07 | 34% | 14 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–9 | 0.03 | 22% | 14 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 4–13 | -0.00 | 43% | 2 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 0–4 | -0.08 | 0% | 7 Jan → | |
| mirage | 6–13 | 0.01 | 39% | 6 Jan → | |
| mirage | 8–13 | -0.01 | 23% | 5 Jan → | |
| dust2 | 13–0 | -0.00 | 33% | 5 Jan → | |
| train | 9–13 | -0.03 | 23% | 5 Jan → | |
| office | 10–13 | 0.15 | 33% | 5 Jan → | |
| mirage | 13–8 | 0.11 | 43% | 5 Jan → | |
| nuke | 12–12 | 0.07 | 28% | 5 Jan → | |
| mirage | 13–3 | 0.14 | 53% | 4 Jan → | |
| mirage | 13–7 | 0.07 | 33% | 4 Jan → | |
| mirage | 13–11 | 0.05 | 41% | 4 Jan → | |
| mirage | 12–12 | 0.15 | 34% | 3 Jan → | |
| vertigo | 13–5 | 0.13 | 50% | 3 Jan → | |
| mirage | 13–7 | 0.05 | 20% | 3 Jan → | |
| mirage | 13–1 | 0.12 | 34% | 3 Jan → | |
| mirage | 13–8 | 0.10 | 43% | 3 Jan → | |
| mirage | 13–1 | 0.05 | 26% | 3 Jan → | |
| mirage | 13–2 | 0.03 | 75% | 3 Jan → | |
| mirage | 2–13 | -0.03 | 36% | 3 Jan → | |
| office | 8–13 | -0.01 | 47% | 2 Jan → | |
| dust2 | 13–10 | 0.03 | 32% | 2 Jan → | |
| office | 13–2 | 0.04 | 73% | 1 Jan → | |
| office | 13–6 | 0.23 | 50% | 1 Jan → | |
| mirage | 13–2 | 0.10 | 37% | 1 Jan → | |
| mirage | 13–8 | 0.06 | 38% | 1 Jan → | |
| mirage | 13–1 | 0.06 | 26% | 1 Jan → | |
| dust2 | 13–4 | 0.06 | 33% | 1 Jan → | |
| mirage | 12–12 | -0.05 | 42% | 1 Jan → | |
| office | 7–2 | -0.05 | 78% | 1 Jan → | |
| mirage | 10–13 | 0.11 | 35% | 31 Dec → | |
| office | 13–11 | 0.03 | 50% | 31 Dec → | |
| office | 3–13 | -0.06 | 43% | 31 Dec → | |
| office | 13–9 | 0.07 | 42% | 31 Dec → | |
| inferno | 13–9 | 0.08 | 38% | 29 Dec → | |
| inferno | 11–13 | 0.05 | 26% | 29 Dec → | |
| mirage | 13–6 | 0.03 | 43% | 29 Dec → | |
| mirage | 13–7 | 0.03 | 25% | 29 Dec → | |
| mirage | 1–13 | -0.04 | 45% | 29 Dec → | |
| mirage | 5–13 | 0.05 | 15% | 29 Dec → | |
| dust2 | 13–11 | 0.02 | 24% | 29 Dec → | |
| palacio | 13–3 | -0.01 | 36% | 29 Dec → | |
| office | 10–13 | -0.01 | 68% | 29 Dec → | |
| inferno | 13–1 | 0.16 | 34% | 29 Dec → | |
| mirage | 13–7 | 0.07 | 26% | 29 Dec → | |
| mirage | 13–4 | -0.04 | 19% | 29 Dec → | |
| office | 13–11 | 0.06 | 41% | 28 Dec → | |
| mirage | 13–5 | 0.05 | 38% | 28 Dec → | |
| mirage | 13–2 | 0.06 | 50% | 24 Dec → | |
| dust2 | 11–13 | -0.01 | 29% | 24 Dec → | |
| mirage | 13–0 | 0.11 | 44% | 24 Dec → | |
| mirage | 12–12 | 0.02 | 32% | 24 Dec → | |
| mirage | 12–12 | -0.02 | 58% | 24 Dec → | |
| office | 6–13 | 0.02 | 43% | 24 Dec → | |
| office | 2–13 | 0.01 | 58% | 24 Dec → | |
| office | 13–6 | 0.04 | 48% | 24 Dec → | |
| office | 13–7 | -0.05 | 38% | 23 Dec → | |
| mirage | 10–13 | 0.10 | 34% | 23 Dec → | |
| office | 13–6 | 0.02 | 39% | 23 Dec → | |
| nuke | 13–8 | 0.07 | 42% | 23 Dec → | |
| office | 13–3 | 0.12 | 50% | 22 Dec → | |
| nuke | 6–13 | -0.00 | 19% | 22 Dec → | |
| office | 8–0 | 0.06 | 75% | 22 Dec → | |
| dust2 | 13–9 | 0.03 | 42% | 22 Dec → | |
| dust2 | 11–13 | 0.08 | 32% | 22 Dec → | |
| inferno | 7–9 | 0.06 | 60% | 22 Dec → | |
| dust2 | 13–2 | 0.08 | 40% | 22 Dec → | |
| mirage | 13–11 | 0.04 | 47% | 22 Dec → | |
| mirage | 1–13 | -0.03 | 64% | 22 Dec → | |
| office | 13–6 | 0.05 | 57% | 21 Dec → | |
| office | 13–9 | 0.09 | 55% | 21 Dec → | |
| nuke | 1–13 | -0.03 | 30% | 21 Dec → | |
| office | 8–13 | 0.05 | 64% | 21 Dec → | |
| mirage | 13–3 | 0.07 | 33% | 21 Dec → | |
| mirage | 13–1 | 0.04 | 31% | 21 Dec → | |
| mirage | 11–13 | 0.06 | 29% | 20 Dec → | |
| mirage | 11–13 | 0.11 | 28% | 20 Dec → |
Match data via Leetify.
