Vladiss

Vladiss — CS2 Stats

SK76561199095992102[U:1:1135726374]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

527Tracked matches52%Win rate2021Tracked since
915Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.5 Developing
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,149), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate36.3%42.2%42.7%6.4% short
Shot accuracy11.1%11.9%10.8%above
Kill/death ratio0.920.981.000.07 short
Match win rate45.0%43.6%44.1%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGVladissFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim39
Positioning58
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52417Last 10052%Win rateTLWLWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.9
Aggression7.5
Utility5.4
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 611ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.9
Positioning5.8
Utility5.4
Mechanics3.5
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact5.6

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time616ms−21ms
first ⅓ avg 637ms → last ⅓ avg 616ms
Headshot accuracy18.6%+3.0%
first ⅓ avg 15.6% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — vertigo 9–1
130Biggest win — train
11Longest win streak
712In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 83% over 6dust2Weakest map · 38% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C1661038%-0.01
mirageA159660%-0.00
infernoC146843%-0.00
cacheB115645%-0.01
ancientA95456%-0.03
overpassA85363%0.01
nukeA74357%-0.00
vertigoS65183%0.07
train43175%-0.01
anubis41325%0.01
office32167%0.03
italy31233%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

35,411Lifetime kills
0.92K/D
2,247Matches
45.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 3 players
36.3%Headshot %
11.1%Shot accuracy
3,668MVPs
915Hours (in match)
2,298Bombs planted
520Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,911inferno
2,457nuke
2,045dust2
1,324vertigo
547office
285train
188italy
25lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
30.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.5%Spray accuracy
65.9%Counter-strafing
11.6°Preaim
611msReaction time
30.2%T opening success
50.3%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
7.18HE damage / grenade
7.17Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.2113% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient15–15-0.0612%11 Aug
dust29–13-0.018%4 Aug
overpass13–8-0.0419%21 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0610%21 Jul
ancient13–110.0421%17 Jul
nuke7–130.044%15 Jul
cache11–130.1020%15 Jul
inferno7–90.1034%15 Jul
cache13–60.0412%4 Jul
dust213–20.0116%4 Jul
cache13–80.0121%20 Jun
dust211–13-0.0327%20 Jun
inferno12–12-0.0323%15 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0121%13 Jun
office11–130.0623%13 Jun
mirage13–110.009%8 Jun
dust212–12-0.0117%8 Jun
cache3–13-0.0433%8 Jun
italy9–13-0.0418%7 Jun
ancient13–4-0.077%6 Jun
vertigo13–80.0114%6 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0014%5 Jun
cache8–13-0.0116%1 Jun
overpass13–30.0616%30 May
ancient13–6-0.0315%30 May
train13–00.0136%28 May
italy10–13-0.0423%27 May
overpass13–10.0624%27 May
inferno13–110.0223%26 May
dust213–90.0821%20 May
inferno4–13-0.0221%20 May
overpass12–12-0.0622%18 May
cache12–12-0.0712%18 May
nuke13–100.1022%18 May
cache13–4-0.0213%17 May
cache11–13-0.0420%16 May
mirage13–7-0.0219%16 May
anubis13–70.0115%16 May
office13–90.0317%16 May
mirage13–7-0.0419%12 May
dust28–13-0.0216%12 May
anubis10–130.0714%12 May
dust211–13-0.0119%7 May
mirage13–60.1228%7 May
inferno11–13-0.0521%7 May
cache13–40.0139%6 May
cache13–30.0115%29 Apr
cache11–13-0.0722%29 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0022%25 Apr
ancient13–5-0.0018%25 Apr
vertigo13–00.1021%25 Apr
train13–100.0012%18 Apr
dust24–13-0.0029%18 Apr
vertigo9–10.1618%18 Apr
inferno9–4-0.1125%18 Apr
nuke9–00.150%18 Apr
dust213–8-0.0725%17 Apr
nuke13–8-0.0315%17 Apr
vertigo13–90.1514%14 Apr
mirage16–140.0422%14 Apr
train13–00.0122%13 Apr
italy8–00.018%13 Apr
nuke13–10-0.0617%13 Apr
overpass13–90.0110%12 Apr
train5–13-0.054%9 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0617%9 Apr
inferno13–11-0.0219%4 Apr
vertigo12–12-0.0112%4 Apr
vertigo13–70.0513%3 Apr
office13–90.0119%3 Apr
mirage8–10.0221%3 Apr
dust213–70.0324%3 Apr
dust214–16-0.0517%31 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0212%30 Mar
nuke4–9-0.2410%30 Mar
inferno6–9-0.079%30 Mar
dust210–130.0423%26 Mar
overpass16–130.1020%25 Mar
ancient8–13-0.1233%24 Mar
inferno5–130.0811%23 Mar
dust215–15-0.0820%23 Mar
overpass10–13-0.048%19 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0118%19 Mar
inferno10–13-0.003%19 Mar
anubis9–13-0.0313%18 Mar
mirage4–130.0215%18 Mar
dust213–9-0.0427%18 Mar
ancient9–13-0.028%17 Mar
mirage13–8-0.0213%17 Mar
dust23–13-0.0810%16 Mar
inferno13–60.0414%16 Mar
mirage1–13-0.0219%16 Mar
inferno13–40.1126%15 Mar
dust213–110.0114%15 Mar
nuke9–130.0217%15 Mar
inferno8–13-0.078%14 Mar
ancient13–70.0222%14 Mar
overpass6–13-0.037%12 Mar
inferno13–10-0.0018%12 Mar
mirage10–130.0110%10 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches11-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →