lilting

lilting — CS2 Stats

76561199091431695[U:1:1131165967]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

395Tracked matches47%Win rate2026Tracked since
317Hours in CS9Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning37
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51472Last 10051%Win rateWWWWLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.1
Aggression3.4
Utility5.6
Positioning3.7
Opening Duels0.1
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 606ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning3.7
Utility5.6
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels0.2
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time608ms−15ms
first ⅓ avg 623ms → last ⅓ avg 608ms
Headshot accuracy17.0%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 15.7% → last ⅓ avg 17.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — anubis 12–1
131Biggest win — ancient
6Longest win streak
W4Current streak
510In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 15mirageWeakest map · 36% over 28
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC28101836%-0.01
ancientA1811761%0.00
anubisS1510567%0.01
dust2A148657%0.01
infernoC125742%-0.02
nukeA95456%-0.01
cache32167%-0.01
overpass1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 28). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

8,936Lifetime kills
0.78K/D
536Matches
39.9%Match win rate
46.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
0.0%Shot accuracy
806MVPs
202Hours (in match)
532Bombs planted
139Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

736dust2
493nuke
418inferno
41vertigo
8office
6ar_shoots
4train
4ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

188Matches
49%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
76.0ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5042%0.9013.5
Anubis3661%1.1114.8
Ancient3247%0.9913.8
Dust22454%1.2015.9
Nuke1753%1.0315.0
Inferno1747%1.0516.3
Cache1145%1.1216.3
Overpass10%0.7213.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.8%Headshot accuracy
36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.0%Spray accuracy
86.7%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
606msReaction time
29.3%T opening success
31.5%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
9.12HE damage / grenade
8.70Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.3183% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 28 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–40.0216%18 Aug
ancient16–120.0120%18 Aug
cache13–50.0216%17 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0125%17 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0713%17 Aug
ancient12–16-0.0818%16 Aug
dust24–13-0.0526%15 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0211%14 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0211%13 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0022%13 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0512%13 Aug
mirage13–110.0025%12 Aug
inferno16–13-0.0224%31 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0410%31 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0514%31 Jul
nuke17–19-0.0414%31 Jul
mirage13–50.0725%30 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0215%26 Jul
inferno12–160.0117%25 Jul
dust213–10-0.0522%25 Jul
mirage13–50.0114%25 Jul
dust26–130.0114%24 Jul
cache13–50.0130%24 Jul
dust213–40.0823%24 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0214%24 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0019%24 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0311%24 Jul
anubis13–50.0119%23 Jul
mirage13–60.0113%23 Jul
anubis13–100.0121%23 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0413%23 Jul
inferno8–13-0.034%23 Jul
inferno10–13-0.049%22 Jul
dust213–110.0817%22 Jul
nuke13–70.0416%22 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0013%22 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0518%21 Jul
ancient19–150.049%21 Jul
anubis9–130.0125%21 Jul
mirage11–130.0317%21 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0714%19 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0420%19 Jul
ancient10–130.0317%18 Jul
nuke13–90.1415%15 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0215%15 Jul
dust213–9-0.0925%15 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0029%15 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0415%15 Jul
ancient2–13-0.047%15 Jul
ancient13–10.1316%14 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0513%13 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0315%12 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0714%12 Jul
dust28–13-0.0112%10 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0112%10 Jul
ancient13–70.0817%10 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0516%10 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0210%10 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0518%9 Jul
mirage8–13-0.093%6 Jul
mirage13–110.0112%5 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0112%5 Jul
dust213–50.1232%4 Jul
anubis14–16-0.0113%4 Jul
ancient13–10.024%4 Jul
anubis13–60.0019%4 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0227%4 Jul
mirage13–70.0329%3 Jul
inferno13–30.0217%3 Jul
ancient13–5-0.0113%3 Jul
nuke3–13-0.089%3 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0411%3 Jul
ancient10–130.0112%3 Jul
anubis13–70.0314%3 Jul
dust211–130.0219%3 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0221%2 Jul
nuke19–17-0.0118%2 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0514%2 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0433%30 Jun
ancient13–30.0013%30 Jun
anubis13–60.0613%30 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0312%29 Jun
overpass9–13-0.0211%29 Jun
dust213–60.0618%29 Jun
dust213–90.0220%29 Jun
anubis12–10.1610%29 Jun
mirage13–90.0312%29 Jun
mirage10–130.0111%29 Jun
dust213–9-0.0414%29 Jun
cache6–13-0.0719%28 Jun
ancient13–70.0819%28 Jun
mirage12–160.0221%25 Jun
dust29–13-0.0614%25 Jun
ancient13–7-0.0113%25 Jun
dust213–160.0119%25 Jun
mirage17–190.0117%25 Jun
mirage13–50.0724%25 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0013%25 Jun
anubis13–30.015%25 Jun
mirage5–10-0.0114%24 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →