tnoos — CS2 Stats

76561199576928838[U:1:1616663110]

554Tracked matches45%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating15,065Purple band · top ~28.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#14287 of 22593 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtnoosFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER15,065 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning41
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56413Last 10056%Win rateLLWWLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.5
Aggression4.3
Utility4.2
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch3.6

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 632ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning4.1
Utility4.2
Mechanics8.8
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time628ms−36ms
first ⅓ avg 664ms → last ⅓ avg 628ms
Headshot accuracy22.2%+3.8%
first ⅓ avg 18.4% → last ⅓ avg 22.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — nuke 9–13
131Biggest win — mirage
9Longest win streak
L2Current streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 81% over 16dust2Weakest map · 25% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2316770%-0.01
dust2D2051525%-0.01
infernoA1810856%0.02
anubisS1613381%0.02
nukeB115645%0.02
ancientS75271%0.00
cacheC52340%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

261Matches
50%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
87.3ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6557%1.0516.5
Dust25246%1.0317.2
Anubis3959%1.0517.4
Inferno3142%0.9515.8
Ancient2642%0.9916.6
Cache2148%1.0418.6
Nuke1867%0.9516.8
Vertigo812%0.7013.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.1%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.1%Spray accuracy
89.4%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
632msReaction time
32.1%T opening success
47.9%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
9.08HE damage / grenade
7.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.119% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust211–13-0.0426%11 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0123%11 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0219%11 Aug
inferno13–30.0321%10 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0114%7 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0110%7 Aug
mirage13–10-0.068%6 Aug
inferno13–90.0223%5 Aug
inferno10–130.0732%5 Aug
nuke16–140.0323%4 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0524%4 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0536%3 Aug
nuke17–19-0.0022%31 Jul
dust24–13-0.0226%30 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0416%29 Jul
inferno13–70.0617%29 Jul
nuke10–130.0121%29 Jul
dust24–13-0.0429%29 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0530%28 Jul
mirage13–90.0226%28 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0217%28 Jul
cache13–160.0217%28 Jul
dust29–13-0.0622%28 Jul
anubis13–50.0320%28 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0520%28 Jul
dust29–130.0417%27 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0326%27 Jul
anubis19–17-0.0216%27 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0242%27 Jul
dust215–15-0.0325%27 Jul
ancient2–13-0.1019%27 Jul
anubis13–50.0619%27 Jul
ancient13–50.0627%27 Jul
dust27–13-0.0119%26 Jul
ancient13–90.0436%26 Jul
nuke13–80.0526%26 Jul
dust213–60.0013%26 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0317%26 Jul
anubis13–50.0119%23 Jul
mirage13–60.0422%23 Jul
anubis13–100.0428%23 Jul
inferno9–130.0016%23 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0721%22 Jul
mirage13–50.0317%22 Jul
mirage13–70.0318%22 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0128%21 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0010%21 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0117%21 Jul
inferno13–30.0126%21 Jul
anubis13–4-0.0026%21 Jul
anubis13–40.1226%21 Jul
mirage16–140.0133%21 Jul
inferno12–160.0030%21 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0224%20 Jul
mirage13–70.0327%20 Jul
inferno13–30.0624%20 Jul
dust213–70.0822%20 Jul
nuke9–130.1518%20 Jul
dust27–13-0.0527%20 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0617%20 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0512%20 Jul
mirage13–10.0729%20 Jul
dust26–13-0.0514%20 Jul
anubis13–80.0016%19 Jul
mirage15–150.0224%19 Jul
nuke13–20.0416%19 Jul
dust23–7-0.110%17 Jul
inferno13–30.1019%16 Jul
dust213–3-0.0321%16 Jul
dust25–130.0421%15 Jul
inferno13–110.0632%15 Jul
inferno13–50.0523%10 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0014%10 Jul
anubis13–100.0013%10 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0216%10 Jul
dust213–60.089%10 Jul
anubis13–110.0225%10 Jul
nuke13–100.0015%10 Jul
cache16–130.0020%9 Jul
cache6–9-0.0116%9 Jul
inferno0–30.000%9 Jul
cache3–8-0.0515%9 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0421%9 Jul
dust27–130.0216%8 Jul
cache13–70.0218%5 Jul
dust213–50.0220%4 Jul
dust26–13-0.0322%3 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0417%3 Jul
dust211–13-0.0418%3 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0222%2 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0710%2 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0221%1 Jul
mirage16–140.0122%28 Jun
ancient13–10.0925%28 Jun
nuke13–90.0319%28 Jun
dust211–13-0.0024%27 Jun
anubis13–80.0930%27 Jun
nuke11–130.0521%25 Jun
mirage13–1-0.0311%25 Jun
mirage16–140.1213%25 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →