Melphi — CS2 Stats
NE76561199086789887[U:1:1126524159]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,966), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 8 median | Level 9 median | vs Level 9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 45.3% | 47.0% | 48.5% | 3.2% short |
| Shot accuracy | 10.0% | 12.7% | 13.3% | 3.2% short |
| Kill/death ratio | 0.95 | 1.07 | 1.07 | 0.12 short |
| Match win rate | 45.6% | 46.4% | 47.0% | 1.4% short |
This profile sits below the typical Level 9 player on every metric we can compare.
Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Player DNA
Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.
Limited utility dependence
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match
Plays most like ropz 89% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.
Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
Reaction time. 653ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 386 | 50% | 1.05 | 15.7 |
| Anubis | 332 | 51% | 1.08 | 16.5 |
| Ancient | 262 | 50% | 1.07 | 16.7 |
| Dust2 | 165 | 51% | 1.06 | 16.2 |
| Nuke | 101 | 43% | 1.01 | 15.5 |
| Inferno | 64 | 45% | 0.96 | 14.5 |
| Train | 34 | 59% | 1.10 | 16.4 |
| Cache | 27 | 44% | 0.95 | 13.7 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Grenades & UtilityGrenade Lineups →
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4495 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 38.7367% — below the 40% mark we flag