Hank Hill

Hank Hill — CS2 Stats

76561199074953473[U:1:1114687745]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

381Tracked matches31%Win rate2025Tracked since
471Hours in CS10Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.1 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating15,000Purple band · top ~28.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#26698 of 43937 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=5,002), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate41.3%44.2%47.1%5.8% short
Shot accuracy2.2%11.6%12.8%10.6% short
Kill/death ratio0.971.031.080.11 short
Match win rate51.5%45.2%46.6%above

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHank HillPREMIER15,000 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning42
Utility15

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47494Last 10047%Win rateLWLLTLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.1
Aggression4.6
Utility1.5
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 695ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning4.2
Utility1.5
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time691ms+42ms
first ⅓ avg 649ms → last ⅓ avg 691ms
Headshot accuracy22.2%+3.0%
first ⅓ avg 19.2% → last ⅓ avg 22.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — dust2 13–4
131Biggest win — train
6Longest win streak
98In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 63% over 19infernoWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB23111248%-0.02
dust2A1912763%0.01
mirageC1881044%-0.01
anubisC125742%0.00
infernoC83538%0.00
ancientC83538%0.01
cacheB63350%-0.02
office31233%-0.06
train21150%0.03
overpass1010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

12,283Lifetime kills
0.97K/D
856Matches
51.5%Match win rate · Top 10% of Purple band
41.3%Headshot %
2.2%Shot accuracy
1,491MVPs
324Hours (in match)
837Bombs planted
207Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,998dust2
1,286nuke
757inferno
299train
266vertigo
150office
42cbble
14italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1Matches
0%Win rate
0.29Avg K/D
30.0ADR
60%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
0Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.0%Headshot accuracy
31.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.7%Spray accuracy
82.7%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
695msReaction time
33.5%T opening success
38.5%CT opening success
0.25Enemies flashed / flash
2.2%Flash assists
10.33HE damage / grenade
0.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.25 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.5188% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno11–13-0.0014%30 Aug
nuke13–50.0225%30 Aug
nuke10–13-0.1335%24 Aug
dust28–13-0.0717%24 Aug
overpass12–120.0221%24 Aug
nuke11–130.0431%24 Aug
train13–10.0824%24 Aug
train5–13-0.0230%23 Aug
cache8–130.0317%22 Aug
nuke13–110.0522%22 Aug
cache2–1-0.1250%22 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0823%22 Aug
cache5–13-0.0947%19 Aug
mirage8–13-0.069%19 Aug
nuke9–13-0.1125%17 Aug
nuke0–2-0.090%17 Aug
mirage13–50.0126%17 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0314%17 Aug
anubis14–160.0214%10 Aug
dust213–40.1433%10 Aug
mirage5–00.0429%10 Aug
anubis5–130.0112%9 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0612%9 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0416%9 Aug
dust24–130.0150%9 Aug
office9–13-0.105%4 Aug
dust27–13-0.0213%4 Aug
nuke2–8-0.0833%1 Aug
dust27–00.1214%1 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0128%31 Jul
dust24–13-0.0518%30 Jul
anubis13–70.0414%30 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0411%30 Jul
anubis13–90.0518%30 Jul
ancient9–130.0713%30 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0014%27 Jul
anubis16–12-0.0020%27 Jul
nuke13–80.069%27 Jul
mirage7–130.0212%27 Jul
inferno3–130.0214%27 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0317%26 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0117%26 Jul
dust213–60.0415%26 Jul
mirage13–60.014%26 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0413%26 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0412%26 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0130%26 Jul
dust213–70.0527%26 Jul
dust213–60.0321%25 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0210%25 Jul
ancient10–130.0512%25 Jul
nuke16–13-0.0318%25 Jul
dust213–100.0242%25 Jul
mirage10–13-0.078%24 Jul
inferno13–50.0113%24 Jul
anubis4–130.0015%24 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0118%22 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0315%22 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0536%21 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0126%21 Jul
dust212–120.0026%20 Jul
nuke1–7-0.0442%18 Jul
dust214–16-0.0714%17 Jul
mirage13–70.0920%17 Jul
inferno9–130.0320%17 Jul
inferno13–70.0316%17 Jul
dust213–11-0.0616%13 Jul
nuke13–70.0312%13 Jul
cache13–90.0625%13 Jul
mirage10–130.0211%13 Jul
nuke13–90.0718%13 Jul
nuke13–70.0121%13 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0113%13 Jul
office12–12-0.0214%13 Jul
dust211–13-0.0215%13 Jul
office13–11-0.0711%11 Jul
ancient3–130.0319%11 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0229%11 Jul
nuke13–110.0324%7 Jul
nuke12–12-0.0116%6 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0615%6 Jul
dust213–11-0.0128%6 Jul
ancient13–40.0827%6 Jul
dust213–50.0710%6 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0826%5 Jul
dust213–10-0.0629%5 Jul
anubis10–130.0217%5 Jul
mirage13–100.0420%5 Jul
cache5–130.0516%5 Jul
cache13–10-0.0522%5 Jul
anubis10–130.0023%4 Jul
dust213–3-0.0018%4 Jul
nuke2–13-0.0719%4 Jul
mirage6–13-0.048%29 Jun
mirage13–110.0519%29 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0220%29 Jun
dust213–100.1124%29 Jun
anubis13–6-0.0321%29 Jun
nuke13–4-0.045%29 Jun
nuke13–90.0240%29 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →